Sams “devotion to his master is so absolute that he never thinks of himself or of stealing the Ring” (“The Lord of the Rings” Novels for Student). Tolkien creates Sam as a character who readers are able to relate to more. He creates Sam as a secondary main character who is the opposite of Frodo: a character that’s never concerned with owning the Ring for himself. J.R.R Tolkien even states in The Letters of J.R.R Tolkien that “Sam is the most closely drawn character, the successor to Bilbo of the first book, the genuine hobbit” (Tolkien 105). He goes further on to say “Frodo is not so interesting, because he has to be high-minded, and has a vocation” (Tolkien 105). Tolkien expresses his dislike for Frodo as a character here. Tolkien even ends his novels with Sam, as he returned to his life in the Shire and lived a normal life with his family. As stated previously, Sam is a character readers can relate to more often than Frodo. Sam teaches us about the power of friendship. He expresses friendship as devotion to another person. Readers see this through Sam’s actions, such as carrying Frodo up Mount Doom or continuing with Frodo when Frodo believed he should go by himself, that Sam will sacrifice anything for Frodo. In the end, the character readers learn most from is Sam, not Frodo. Frodo’s attitude change from the beginning of the book to the end. He succumbs to Rings power, losing the noble attitude he had in the beginning, thus making his role tragic. Sam grows into a character that “transformed beyond what he recognizes in himself. In the end he becomes the subject of all his dreams” (Broadway). Readers can relate to a character like Sam more, one that strived to better himself into what he wanted to be, than to Frodo, one who had a tragic
Sams “devotion to his master is so absolute that he never thinks of himself or of stealing the Ring” (“The Lord of the Rings” Novels for Student). Tolkien creates Sam as a character who readers are able to relate to more. He creates Sam as a secondary main character who is the opposite of Frodo: a character that’s never concerned with owning the Ring for himself. J.R.R Tolkien even states in The Letters of J.R.R Tolkien that “Sam is the most closely drawn character, the successor to Bilbo of the first book, the genuine hobbit” (Tolkien 105). He goes further on to say “Frodo is not so interesting, because he has to be high-minded, and has a vocation” (Tolkien 105). Tolkien expresses his dislike for Frodo as a character here. Tolkien even ends his novels with Sam, as he returned to his life in the Shire and lived a normal life with his family. As stated previously, Sam is a character readers can relate to more often than Frodo. Sam teaches us about the power of friendship. He expresses friendship as devotion to another person. Readers see this through Sam’s actions, such as carrying Frodo up Mount Doom or continuing with Frodo when Frodo believed he should go by himself, that Sam will sacrifice anything for Frodo. In the end, the character readers learn most from is Sam, not Frodo. Frodo’s attitude change from the beginning of the book to the end. He succumbs to Rings power, losing the noble attitude he had in the beginning, thus making his role tragic. Sam grows into a character that “transformed beyond what he recognizes in himself. In the end he becomes the subject of all his dreams” (Broadway). Readers can relate to a character like Sam more, one that strived to better himself into what he wanted to be, than to Frodo, one who had a tragic