Even though the death toll (25 people) was very low for such a catastrophic event, thousands were left homeless, with 3,354 building destroyed. It cost over 1.5 billion dollars, and at the time it had the largest response to a fire ever recorded. …show more content…
This was met with some resistance from people who believe that it would cause thistle and other brush to grow in its place. Rachel Swan of the San Francisco Chronicle wrote, “Today’s trees are older, with long, ribbony bark that breaks off and forms dangerous embers during a wildfire, Stephens said. Drought, periodic freezes and beetle infestations have made the bark more feeble. ‘We’ve got these trees suffering in the hills, and the Caldecott acting as a natural wind tunnel,’ said Piper, who now chairs the Oakland Firesafe Council, a neighborhood group dedicated to wildfire prevention. ‘And every 20 years or so, something gets really bad on those hot, windy days.”’ (Swan, Rachel. “25 Years Later: Oakland Hills Ripe for Another Firestorm.”) Unfortunately, The city was not able to get much done after a lawsuit form a small group of people totally opposed to the idea of cutting the trees down, and the federal government not giving ta grant as a