The Federalist Papers on Division of Powers “A nation without a national government is, in my view, an awful spectacle. The establishment of a constitution, in time of profound peace, by the voluntary consent of a whole people, is a prodigy, to the completion of which I look forward with trembling anxiety.” After the American Revolutionary War, many Americans were opposed to the idea of a strong central government. They saw the idea of a strong centralized government as a gateway back into the familiar tyrannical government and abuse of power that they had just fought so hard to free themselves of. Nevertheless, a heated debate amongst the elitist groups had begun. Were the Articles of Confederation enough to protect and run a functional and
…show more content…
The 85 essays that they would write, detailed how the Constitution would provide “a remedy for the diseases most incident to Republican Government” and to “secure the public good and private rights” arguing over concepts that they felt were key to providing this security. Publius deeply believed that in order for America to work properly they needed to be united as one. They felt that under the current Articles of Confederation, states didn’t have an obligation to help each other in times of crisis because they didn’t need to be a “whole” and that the “Separation of Powers” maintained in the Articles was not an effective way to protect the public against potential abuses. Publius argues that each department should have a will of its own and have as little as possible to do with the appointment of members of the other branches; that each department should have enough power to carry out its mission and then limit its power so that it cannot become to …show more content…
In order to mix these into a working society, the founders needed to know where the line of power of the Federal government ended and State government began. An uncertainty in this division gives way to disagreements on interpretation of laws. It is from this uncertainty that Federalists felt separation of powers was vital to good government. Publius made his thoughts very clear on the separation of power when he wrote “the accumulation of all powers legislative, executive, and judiciary in the same hands, whether of one, a few or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” This is why it was so important to get the structure of separate powers right. Congress needed to be able to write laws and audit the president, the president needed to be able to see the laws faithfully executed and the interpretation of the law needed to be left to the judicial branch. However, because men are inherently “bad” they needed to find a way to check this power. Calling into play the main common characteristic of politicians, ambition, the founders hoped to counter tyrannical ambition and further reinforce their paper barriers with personal
The 85 essays that they would write, detailed how the Constitution would provide “a remedy for the diseases most incident to Republican Government” and to “secure the public good and private rights” arguing over concepts that they felt were key to providing this security. Publius deeply believed that in order for America to work properly they needed to be united as one. They felt that under the current Articles of Confederation, states didn’t have an obligation to help each other in times of crisis because they didn’t need to be a “whole” and that the “Separation of Powers” maintained in the Articles was not an effective way to protect the public against potential abuses. Publius argues that each department should have a will of its own and have as little as possible to do with the appointment of members of the other branches; that each department should have enough power to carry out its mission and then limit its power so that it cannot become to …show more content…
In order to mix these into a working society, the founders needed to know where the line of power of the Federal government ended and State government began. An uncertainty in this division gives way to disagreements on interpretation of laws. It is from this uncertainty that Federalists felt separation of powers was vital to good government. Publius made his thoughts very clear on the separation of power when he wrote “the accumulation of all powers legislative, executive, and judiciary in the same hands, whether of one, a few or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” This is why it was so important to get the structure of separate powers right. Congress needed to be able to write laws and audit the president, the president needed to be able to see the laws faithfully executed and the interpretation of the law needed to be left to the judicial branch. However, because men are inherently “bad” they needed to find a way to check this power. Calling into play the main common characteristic of politicians, ambition, the founders hoped to counter tyrannical ambition and further reinforce their paper barriers with personal