Essay On Eyewitness

Superior Essays
Few pieces of evidence are more powerful than an eyewitness to a crime pointing to a suspect in a police lineup and exclaiming “That’s him! He’s the one!”

There are also few pieces of evidence more flawed, imperfect, and subject to manipulation by police and prosecutors.

Study after study has shown eyewitness identification to be notoriously unreliable. In fact, as the Innocence Project notes:

“Eyewitness misidentification is the greatest contributing factor to wrongful convictions proven by DNA testing, playing a role in more than 70% of convictions overturned through DNA testing nationwide.”

Memories fade quickly, and recollections can be subject to suggestions and leading statements. Witnesses who simply want to be helpful may incorrectly identify a suspect instead of clearing them of suspicion. Notwithstanding the problems with eyewitness identification, it will never cease to be used by law enforcement and prosecutors. One of the most common and familiar ways to obtain a positive identification of a criminal suspect is through the use of a lineup. You are likely somewhat familiar with the concept of a lineup from movies and television shows. But how do they work? What are your rights? How are police lineups used in criminal cases in Nevada? How Lineups Work A typical lineup typically consists of five to six people, including the suspect. The other individuals are “fillers” who are supposed to fit a description of or resemble the suspect. The term lineup brings to mind images of individuals lined up next to each other in front of a wall while the witness, police, prosecutors, and others look through a two-way mirror at them. However, a “lineup” can also refer to a series of photos shown to a witness to see if they can positively identify the suspect from the pictures. There are two primary ways live and photo lineups are conducted. In a simultaneous lineup, the witness views the suspect and the fillers at the same time. In a sequential lineup, the witness looks at the individuals or photos one at a time. Nevada law (NRS 171.1237) requires that every law enforcement agency in the state establish policies and procedures for conducting live and photo lineups. These procedures may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, for example, recently updated its policies to require “blind” photo lineups, where the administrator isn’t aware who the suspect is. This may not be the case elsewhere in the state. Problems with Lineup Procedure Aside from flawed memory, other factors that can lead to a false identification in a lineup are: • Conditions that make a suspect “stand out” from the other people in the lineup, in a way that suggests the witness should select him/her; • A situation where the suspect is the only person in the lineup who meets the witness 's description of the perpetrator; and • Police making comments to the witness that suggest they should choose a particular person in the lineup.
…show more content…
Whether intentional or not, such statements, gestures, or other conditions of the lineup can taint the already questionable accuracy of eyewitness identification from a lineup.

Right to an Attorney During a Lineup

Because of the potential for such conduct, individuals who have been ordered to participate in a lineup have the right to have an attorney present during the lineup procedure. However, the right to counsel during a lineup only applies where:

• you have actually been charged with a crime, and are not just a suspect, and
• it is a live, physical lineup and not a photographic one.

The attorney will be near the witness and the law enforcement representatives conducting the lineup. The lawyer can carefully watch and listen to how the lineup is conducted, and note any objectionable or improper conduct.

How Lineups Are Used by Prosecutors If an eyewitness identifies the accused during a lineup, that identification can be used as evidence by prosecutors at trial. That is why having counsel present during a lineup is so crucial. If the lineup was conducted improperly or tainted by bias, a defense attorney can move to have the identification from the lineup excluded from evidence. He or she may do so either: • Through a motion as part of the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Eyewitness misidentification is the most common cause of wrongful convictions, accounting for at least seventy-two percent of convictions overturned through DNA testing (The Innocence Project). This being said, eyewitness errors may happen for several reasons, including suggestive police interviewing, an incorrect belief about what the witness saw, and the malleability of confidence (Denov & Campbell, 2005). In this specific case, the malleability of confidence was present. The malleability of confidence refers to how easily influenced the witness is to changing circumstances under stress (Denov & Campbell, 2005). This was evident when Mrs. Roy changed the physical features of the perpetrator to fit Phillion 's description due to the stress of having to choose someone to convict.…

    • 2950 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Here is how misidentification often occurs: A crime is committed, the victim claims they have a vivid memory of the perpetrator, a composite sketch is created and the victim chooses a suspect from the photo and physical lineup. The investigators think they have caught the perpetrator and done justice. They are often times wrong. Eyewitness misidentification has been known as the leading cause of wrongful conviction. A study by the Innocence projects depicts that it plays a role in 72% of wrongful convictions.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful Conviction On the morning of August 10, 1984, Deborah Sykes was brutally stabbed, sexually assaulted, and eventually killed in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. The man convicted for her murder was Darryl Hunt, a 19 year old boy that would go on to spend 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. Hunt was convicted based on eye-witness testimony and informants, but was later exonerated based on DNA evidence that matched a man that was caught just a few months after the murder took place. This case is an exemplar of the strength of DNA evidence and the fragility of eyewitness testimony.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brenton Butler Case Study

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a study done by Steven D. Penrod and Brian L. Cutler, eyewitness identification was tested to find the most reliable effects on eyewitness performance. The studies that they performed indicated that jurors ' evaluations of identification evidence are heavily influenced by the confidence of the eyewitness. Unfortunately, in this case and in many other cases, the confidence of the eyewitness did not matter because he still identified the wrong man. The correlation between confidence and accurate eyewitness identification is weak (Penrod & Cutler, 1989). Because the victim’s husband was so confident in his identification, the cops did not feel obligated to find all of the evidence that they needed to prosecute Brenton.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The value of eyewitness evidence depends on how strong it is from the beginning and whether it is preserved or tested properly. If the evidence is weak then it cannot be processed as a valuable report from the crime because there can be various mistakes such as description errors or the accuracy of what happened in the crime scene. In the documentary “Murder on a Sunday Morning” (2002) the eyewitness identification in…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without full information an attorney cannot do their job in full. Evidence: Eye witness identification: Eyewitness misidentification is the single greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide, playing a role in nearly 75% of convictions overturned through DNA testing. While eyewitness testimony can be persuasive evidence before a judge or jury, 30 years of strong…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The defendant that was charged with or indicated crime during the preliminary hearing, when dealing with the rights to attach the defendant must be charged with the crime first. Attachment to the right to counsel the individual is merely suspected of committing a crime. Counsel rights don’t attach to the investigation stage, even if the individual isn’t the only suspect. Many of the suspects have the right to attach counsel under the Sixth Amendment when a prosecution is commenced against him or her. In the cases Alabama v. Coleman the Supreme Court is does, and the state must provide counsel if the is indigent.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evidentiary matters Council on both sides are allowed to request the exclusion of certain evidence. This is referred to as “in limine” Opening statements Opening statement begging with the prosecution, and is followed by the defense, and are made to the judge or jury, depending on the trail type. Both sides are precise in what they say they can deliver. The defense may refrain from making an opening statement until the commencement of their defense. The defense may decline to make an opening statement.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An issue in developmental psychology that is a common topic of research is the question of whether or not the testimony of young children can be trusted. Can they recognize perpetrators or even remember events accurately? The answers to these questions should inform how children are questioned as eyewitnesses in the courtroom, and since many people aren’t as educated in this topic, it important for a policy to be implemented to ensure that findings from recent research are being used to effectively utilize children as eyewitnesses. There are three main topics of applicable research that I will discuss in this paper, and they are: use of initial exhaustive recall to avoid retrieval-induced forgetting, eye closure in recalling events, and repeating…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Importance Of Eyewitness Testimony

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited

    In conclusion, both an eyewitness and the reasonable person provide standards in the court of law that are used in determining whether to convict a suspect, as demonstrated by the eyewitness in the State v. Hendersen (2011) case. Unfortunately, both standards are based upon subjective perception. For example, human error in memory processing may decrease the accuracy in an eyewitness testimony. Research should be done on individual interpretation as it relates to an eyewitness or the reasonable person in order to prevent any wrongful…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not Criminally Responsible Crimes (NRC) has been highly studied and a popular topic of conversation in the past ten years. Due to a rise in media coverage of said crimes, public opinions have seemed to increase as well. To engage in the ongoing conversation about NRC, one must first understand what it means to be Not Criminally Responsible. According to Maeder, Yamamoto & Fenwick (2015), “the verdict [of NRC cases] means that the court has ruled that the accused was not criminally liable for his or her actions at the time the offence was committed”. Overall trends on what has been published on the topic mostly revealed that attitudes toward the NCR defence were predominantly negative.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Eyewitness testimony can become very controversial, sometimes even contradictory. In some cases, people are willing to lie to help others, and in some, they may genuinely believe false statements. However, testimony from witnesses can be necessary in determining the facts of specific cases. Though it may be necessary, it usually does not help in determining the genuine truth. In most cases, eyewitness testimony is invalid.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is why science such as DNA should be strongly considered to help prove the guilt or innocence of the defendant; it’s essential. In order to fix this issue, there has to be improved police training, video recordings, and provision of expert witness testimony in order to have clearer evidence and confessions. Police reports can be also be sloppy if the officer does not get complete and accurate…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The distortion of memories can happen in several divergent methods which are memory bias, flashbulb memories, suggestibility misattribution, and incorrect memories. (Grison, 2017). The combination of those several elements shows that eyewitness testimony is definitely unreliable. There are several ways that a memory can be made up. Coxon debates about the outcome of age, kids or adult, has on the reliability and the truth about eyewitness testimonies (Coxon, Valentine, 2015).…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Summary Many individuals have been led to remember and confess to serious crimes that in fact, never occurred. This can come about when the individual is confronted with special interview tactics that are often used by police interrogators. The way that police interrogators interview potential suspects may have an impact on these false confessions.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics