In Ibn al-Athir’s, The Capture of Jeruselum, he describes “when the Franks saw how violently the Muslims were attacking, how continuous and effective was the fire from the ballista’s and how busily the sappers were breaching the walls, meeting no resistance, they grew desperate.” Even though the Christians were desperate to find a plan they were rejected many times by the king. The Christians and the Muslim people had a rough time getting along because they had only heard the bad of what they were doing. They started to base their opinions of each other off of these stories which grew into even more hatred between the two. This is a great example of a single sided story because without the full truth neither side knew every detail of what was happening. If both sides had heard about each other’s opinion and the full story, less violence would have occurred and maybe even more
In Ibn al-Athir’s, The Capture of Jeruselum, he describes “when the Franks saw how violently the Muslims were attacking, how continuous and effective was the fire from the ballista’s and how busily the sappers were breaching the walls, meeting no resistance, they grew desperate.” Even though the Christians were desperate to find a plan they were rejected many times by the king. The Christians and the Muslim people had a rough time getting along because they had only heard the bad of what they were doing. They started to base their opinions of each other off of these stories which grew into even more hatred between the two. This is a great example of a single sided story because without the full truth neither side knew every detail of what was happening. If both sides had heard about each other’s opinion and the full story, less violence would have occurred and maybe even more