Euthyphro dilemma is started when two questions were presented about the divine command theorists. In the Euthyphro dialogue, Socrates asked if something is right because God commands it, or does God command it because it is right? This created a suggestion about the relationship between morality and religion to be uncertain I think. It seems as if Euthyphro accepts both theories even though as it is being augmented by Socrates to explain further depths of his reasoning. The options offered to the divine command theorist are intended to be logically exhaustive.…
It seeks that Socrates fully understands the meaning of what Euthyphro explication is when it comes to piety however he also comes to the understanding of the differences between each other as well as well as what they could mean. Those differences are the ones at which Socrates begins to contemplate into a disagreeing…
In Plato’s three works Crito, Apology, and Euthyphro, Socrates’ conception of virtue and pursuit of knowledge about virtue, leads him to question and in some cases reject the ideas of others. Examples that show this are: Socrates discussion with Crito, his questioning of Meletus in the Apology, his speech to the jury before and after his conviction, and in his discussion with Euthyphro about what is pious. The teachings of these three works seem to go hand and hand with one another, with the teaching of the Crito being a culmination of the teachings of Euthyphro and Apology. If one were to read Apology and Euthyphro without reading the Crito, one may not understand the teachings of the formers since the Crito gives practice to the teachings…
Euthyphro says that holiness is prosecuting religious offenders. This does not satisfy Socrates because there can be many offenses. Socrates is looking for a more direct answer that applies to most things. Euthyphro then gives him his second answer. He says that holiness is something that is dead to the Gods and unholy is something that is not dear to them.…
And the first answer Euthyphro gives is that it is to prosecute the wrongdoer, as he is doing in the case of his father. Socrates rightly points out that Euthyphro gave him an example rather than a definition and asks him to clarify his answer in the form of a definition. This bit of dialogue is important because it introduces the idea behind much of Plato's writing insofar as there is an instance here of the 'one over many principle' which constitutes the theory of Plato's Forms. Again, Euthyphro has given and example of piety (of which there are many other examples) when instead Socrates wants to know what piety actually is (of which there can be only one definition).…
Over the course of the dialog from the beginning to the end Socrates was trying to teach Euthyphro. So may ask why, it because Euthyphro was the laugh of the town in Athens. He proclaimed he knew something even though was was wrong. He never admitted he was wrong. This in turn made everyone not take Euthyphro seriously.…
Socrates thinks that Euthyphro should make sure that he truly knows what piety and impiety so he doesn't wrongly bring his father to trial. Euthyphro is not worried about the rightness of his actions because he thinks that he firmly believes that he has an accurate knowledge about piety and based on what he knows about piety, his accusation is correct. 7. It is definitely important to examine the connection between wisdom and human action. Wisdom guides and influences human action.…
The Fourth and Fifth of Euthyphro's Definitions to Piety In the fourth definition of Euthyphro in Plato's dialogue of “Euthyphro”, he describes piety is as a “servants show to their master” (Plato 71). meaning the one should follow the god's ways, like in a way in how a priest would follow the words of the gods in what could be good or evil. Furthermore, Euthyphro could be suggesting that attending to gods is piety (good), meaning doing things that would please the gods would be seeing as goods or just. While not attending to the gods would be seen as impiety to the gods, meaning doing things that the gods would not like would seeing as an evil deed.…
Throughout Euthyphro, Socrates and Euthyphro discuss the nature of piety. Socrates asks Euthyphro to explain what the pious and the impious are (5d) and inquires about the form or characteristics of piety (6e). In response, Euthyphro states that “what’s loved by the gods is pious, and what’s not loved by the gods is impious” (7a). Socrates and Euthyphro agree that “the gods quarrel and differ from one another, and that there’s mutual hostility among them” (7b). Following this agreement, Socrates argues that, because the gods quarrel and disagree regarding actions, the same actions would end up being both pious and impious because the gods love and hate different things.…
Socrates is suggesting here that if we do not listen to the one who has knowledge of the soul, then we are destroying our soul with injustice. An example of this would be if we do not pay attention to our bodies then then we are simply “destroying that part of us which is improved”(47d). If do not care for our bodies we are in a way destroying our bodies, if we do not listen to an expert of the human soul then we are in a way destroying what is just for our soul. Socrates sugests that we must pay attention to the “one who knows about just and unjust things”(48a).…
As such, it is held that moral obligation to divine law, and to man, cannot coexist. This paper will address the concept of holiness and its resonance throughout Plato’s dialogue, and why holiness takes a prominent position in the conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro. Three definitions, used by Euthyphro in his argument with Socrates and how Socrates refutes them will be discussed, to include what is believed to be Socrates’ goal throughout the…
Socrates has falsified all of the interpretations of the word that Meno provided him with and decides he wants to search, with Meno, for the true definition of the word. Socrates says to Meno, “So now I do not know what virtue is; perhaps you knew before you contacted me, but now you are certainly like one who does not know. Nevertheless, I want to examine and seek together with you what it may be” (Plato 70). In saying this, Socrates is admitting to Meno that he is unsure of what virtue means and, in fact, deciding that Meno does not know either. He asks Meno to join him in his pursuit of the true definition of the word, and in response, Meno presents his paradox.…
According to accepted beliefs, harboring a manslayer is wrong and pollutes those who associate with him. This response is what leads into a discussion of the main topic of the dialogue: piety. “And what is piety, and what is impiety?” (p. 4). Since Euthyphro is an expert in religion and seems capable of finding the right course to pursue in what appears to Socrates a dilemma (the prosecution of Euthyphro’s father), and since Socrates is facing a religious charge, he proposes that he become Euthyphro’s student in religion.…
Euthyphro’s definition of piety is the action/way that all the gods love. This means that the gods actions are not arbitrary or relative, rather they are deeply rooted in principles which are shared. The similarity I want to draw on is in Mill’s approach to higher pleasures where he believes that competent judges’ preferences are not as relative as they are principled, hence encompassing a deeper and higher value associated with higher pleasures that outweigh the pleasure amount argument. However, it’s important to realize that this justification takes the ideology further away from hedonism as it has now involved other higher senses and principles, which defeats the purpose of hedonism. Still, it does explain the dignity and value we as mortals attach to higher pleasures that are achieved by higher capacity exercises.…
Euthyphro Dilemma The Euthyphro dilemma is an argument that was brought about by a question asked by Socrates during Plato’s Euthyphro. The question is seen to object the Divine Command Theory. Socrates asked, “is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?” or in other words, “Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?”…