Importance Of Euthanasia

Great Essays
Register to read the introduction… Doctors take the Hippocratic oath once they earn their doctorate in medicine. This oath binds them to practice medicine ethically, but it does not state what ethically means in terms of the patient’s well being. Some would argue that euthanasia and assisted suicide is against the oath as the doctor’s are supposed to help the person to the fullest extent, which would ideally be a cure for whatever ails the patient. Others would debate that once a doctor has done all they can do and the patient is more or less at a stand still with their suffering and it is causing that patient to lose their quality of life, it should be the physicians responsibility to make that person feel as content as possible, even if that means death. One doctor, Dr. Cox, went against his Britain’s law that said euthanasia was illegal in 1992. He chose to give in to his patient’s pleads for death as he knew there was nothing he could do to help his patient any longer. Dr. Cox was stripped of his license to practice medicine and he was put in jail for several years on the bases that, even though his patient’s living will stated that they would want to be taken off of life support if their prognosis did not look good, he murdered the elderly man ("Euthanasia, right to …show more content…
Mill’s sociological imagination, which is defined as the application of imaginative though to the asking and answering of sociological questions ("Social Science Dictionary"), are the stories of Anthony Bland, Sue Rodriguez, and Ramon Sanpedro ("Euthanasia, right to die"). By March of 1993 in the UK, Mr. Bland had been in a vegetative state for three years. Mr. Bland had supposedly told his family that if his condition, which is not stated, had gotten to the point where we was in a coma, he did not want to remain on life support. However, because he never made this legal by way of a living will, the Court Order that allowed him to finally be allowed off the life support did not come until he had been in the vegetative state for three years. Mrs. Rodriguez was slowly and painfully dying of Lou Gehrig’s disease. Even though she herself pleaded with the courts to allow her to have her doctor help her commit assisted-suicide when her muscles atrophied to the point in which her quality of life had completely deteriorated, they denied her. In February of 1994, a doctor helped her in secret, thus breaking the law, in order for her to finally rest at peace. And lastly, Mr. Sanpedro also went through the courts in order to receive medical assistance with his death. As a young boy, Mr. Sanpedro was paralyzed from the neck down after an unfortunate accident while swimming in Spain. The courts denied him because there were plenty of other people who were in the same condition that lived decent enough

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For this doctor, his personal thoughts came up following a lethal morphine injection. The uncomfort he felt after “helping” this man showed in the panicking tendencies, seeing the IV pole with watching eyes and saying he was innocent for not killing the man. Although the doctor was uncomfortable, he did exactly as the patient and family asked. So did this doctor murder his patient? In the doctor’s eyes he did, but it was for a medical reason, not a personal one.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines euthanasia as the act or practice of killing someone who is very sick or injured in order to prevent any more suffering. There are many different types of euthanasia: voluntary, non-voluntary, and involuntary; euthanasia by action or by omission; and assisted suicide. This essay will focus solely on physician assisted suicide. Medicinenet.com defines assisted suicide as the voluntary termination of one's life by administration of lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance. Dr. Brian Pollard discusses in the article, “Human Rights and Euthanasia” the case of physician assisted suicide and the autonomy of both the patient and the physician.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is clear that the utmost importance in any medical context is the relationship between the healthcare practitioner and the patient. The duty of a physician is to adhere to certain principles of medical ethics namely the principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. By examining the case study involving Dr. Nancy Morrison, one can observe that these principles are often ambiguous when referring to the issue of whether she committed voluntary active euthanasia or nonvoluntary active euthanasia. Thus, the thesis will aim to exemplify that ultimately Dr. Nancy Morrison was culpable for her actions. To give some context to the issue, Paul Mills was a 65-year-old individual suffering from terminal esophageal cancer.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, Steinbock tries to refute the claims about euthanasia presented by James Rachels, and tries to show how Rachel’s misinterpreted the American Medical Association 's doctrine regarding euthanasia. Steinbock states that contrary to Rachel’s interpretation, the AMA does not endorse any type of euthanasia, and that the termination of life is never the goal in a professional medical practice. Steinbock argues that Rachel 's error in his essay was the linkage of ending “extraordinary care” and passive euthanasia. Steinbock says that stoppage of extraordinary care or treatment that would prolong one 's life and creates burden for that patient is not always linked to the intention of death. Steinbock says “there can be a point (to the cessation of life-prolonging treatment) other than an endeavor to bring about the patient’s death,” Steinbock continues to provide examples where withholding treatment does not necessarily mean that this decision was made for the cession of life.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the original Hippocratic Oath, written in 400 B.C.E., physicians were made to swear that they would “neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will [they] make a suggestion to this effect.” While many physicians to this day fiercely agree with this statement, it would be unreasonable not to reconsider and evaluate a centuries-old perception on physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) calls for physicians to prescribe lethal medication to patients with terminal illnesses who desire to end their lives. Although the debate over the legalization and morality of PAS is thousands of years old, in the past fifty years the issue has been put under the spotlight with the legalization of the practice in countries…

    • 2469 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Eighth Amendment(VIII) to the United States Constitution being the Bill of Right that prohibits unusual punishments and cruel, the debate whether death penalty constitute cruel and unusual punishment remains unsolved puzzle in the United States or in some States. As some states have mandatory death penalties in certain cases, the Supreme Court found these laws unconstitutional (Woodson v. North Carolina 1976) and they actually violates the Eighth Amendment (Furman v. Georgia 1972). However, using these examples I am not saying that Charles Laverne Singleton should have been freed because he killed someone.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Death With Dignity: A Commentary Sergej Jagodin Millersville University Medical Aid in Dying: A Commentary The ability to choose when to die is not a topic that is heavily discussed throughout a person’s life. What constitutes dying early and on one’s own terms? Is it moral? Is it right?…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thousands of people died during the Holocaust due to medical experiments and poor doctoring. To be a doctor during the holocaust had to be German and part of the Nazi party. They did not take their Hippocrates Oath seriously, and commonly seemed to act the exact opposite. Doctors would also decide who was fit to work and who wasn't. They also sterilized the workers or terminated pregnancies.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever gone through agonizing pain and suffering before? Gone through hell hours? For days? Or even for weeks? Have you gone to the important decisions of telling your loved ones that you 've decided it’s your time already?…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is the voluntary termination of a person’s life with the assistance of a physician in a controlled environment allows a quick, painless, and dignified death for those suffering from terminal illnesses. The arguments against physician-assisted suicide are ineffective because it gives terminally ill patients the right a dignified death. Today, five states have legalized physician-assisted suicide, sparing families in those states from watching their loved ones go through unbearable suffering and pain. The question of assisted suicide, and later physician-assisted suicide, has been long debated.…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We are living in a time when some doctors and lawmakers think the best solution in helping relieve patients suffering is giving them a deadly drug to kill them. Starting between the 17th and 19th century, laws have prohibited physician-assisted suicide. In 1828 the first U.S Statue outlawing physician-assisted suicide was put forth in New York. This issue has been addressed for well over 1000 years, and the majority has always been against the legalization of physician-assisted suicide. Today, in 2016, the conflict of physician-assisted suicide is still prevalent.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. The advantages of euthanasia is helping some people from suffering illness to a person. The benefits are shared mainly by the family of the patient since it saves the health costs and reduces the financial burden on them. It would be a great strain for the friends and family to look after someone who is terminally ill so Euthanasia benefits in this way too. The truth we need to accept is that, the medical supplies being used on a terminally ill patient could be used for a patient who is more likely to recover sooner or later.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a discussion about the Hippocratic Oath (“the Oath”), we consider the opposing perspectives presented by Robert Veatch in The Basics of Bioethics and Daniel Sokol, a medical ethicist who authored the BBC article, A guide to the Hippocratic oath. In this essay, we answer the question of whether the Oath is relevant as a universal code of ethics for today’s physicians. I argue that the Hippocratic Oath does not appear to be relevant to modern medical practice because 1) its philosophical basis is limited to its historical context and 2) it contains problematic language; however, the Oath does contain statements about the duty of a physician to a patient that can create the basis through which to construct a modern, relevant code of ethics…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics