The way we view different cultures can determine our own sense of belonging in our own cultural groups. Ethnocentrism and cultural relativism are the two main ways to compare cultures. Neither one is better than the other, there are benefits to each. After defining these terms, Christianity and Voodoo will be compared using these methods.
Firstly, ethnocentrism is the idea that one’s own culture is superior to others. This provides a sense of purpose and unity within a culture, but alienates those outside of it. For instance, the US often thinks it is more powerful than other countries. This allows for Americans to find common ground and be able to unite. However, anyone outside of the US might feel upset and inferior, even if they live in the US. (“Ethnocentrism.”)
Cultural relativism, on the other hand, focuses on the idea that all cultures are equal, and there is no “true” cultural standard. While this allows more diversity and acceptance, it can also cause a lack of community. An example of this is mannerism differences in certain cultures, in some cultures; it is rude to not sit next to someone if there are open seats. Most people would agree that though that is strange in western culture, it is not necessarily bad. (“Cultural Relativism.”) …show more content…
Voodoo focuses on appeasing minor gods, as their main one does not influence the world. While Christianity sees one god that influences everything in life. Christians would see Voodoo rituals and practices as worshiping Satan, as the two cultures are very different in that respect. Voodooists on the other hand, might say Christians were wasting their time on a god that would not respond, and possibly angering the minor ones actually in control. This allows both groups to become closer internally, but could cause conflict between them. (Christian Research