The differences between barefoot and shod running
Introduction:
Humans have the ability to perform various movements, such as jumping, walking, running, etc. However, tend not to think the essentials of movement as they are not applying the mechanisms that allow them to move from one place to another. The amount of energy required to walk at a comfortable place is very small in comparison with other activities (Everett and Kell, 2010). The study of De Wit et al, (2000) concluded that, running has become one of the most significant recreational activities in the past years.
Researches have focused on various running forms, such as shod and barefoot running conditions. There have been many arguments on the running techniques, regarding which method is more efficient in terms of shock absorption and reduce injuries. Liberman et al, (2012) sustained thatinjuries can be generated by both internal and external factors, such as body mass index (BMI), previous injuries and shoes, core strength and/or flexibility. Long distance running can cause injuries up to 70% per year. According to Edwards et al, (2012), shock absorption consists of peak magnitude and frequency of the acceleration produced by the impact.The correlation between the two studies explains to readers that different running forms are annexed. The gait cycle is known as the movement that starts when the heel touches the floor and continues until the same heel strikes the floor again (Everett & Kell, 2010). …show more content…
It is divided in two phases, the stance phase and the swing phase.
During the stance phase, the lower extremity is in contact with the ground. This phase is formed by 5 different stages (the Heel Strike, Foot Flat, Mid Stance, Heel Off and Toe Off) which form the whole movement. In contrast, during the swing phase, the current limb, is not in contact with the ground. This phase has three stages ( Acceleration, Mid Swing and Deceleration) that generates the entire movement.
• The aim of this study is to investigate the kinematic and kinetic differences in barefoot and shod running.
It has been hypothesized that there will be significant kinematic and kinetic differences between barefoot and shod running . It has been hypothesized that there will be no significant kinematic and kinetic differences between barefoot and shod running
Methods:
Participants:
The participants that took part on this study were 3 male students aged between 19-23 years old, with average height and weight. All three of them have similar fitness conditions, because they are currently exercising by going to the gym or playing sports such as football. None of the participants mentioned any health problems or physical injuries. Apparatus: QualisysOgus 3+ Motion Camera was used for the 2D kinematics recordings.+ Force platform Ground Force Kisler UK 926BA=> read Hamil et al Reflective markers on the bony landmarks of the hip(greater trochanter) knee(lateral epicondyle) ankle (lateral malleolus) and toe (5th metatarsal) for the 2D kinematics Procedures: The participants had to perform threeruns in both barefoot and shod conditions. They were required to wear shorts, because reflective markers were added on the bony landmarks of their hip (greater trochanter) knee (lateral epicondyle) ankle (lateral malleolus) and toe (5th metatarsal). Trials runs were given to the participants before the testing, to familiarize with the experiment. Additional time measures were noted of every trial and divided it by the
Introduction:
Humans have the ability to perform various movements, such as jumping, walking, running, etc. However, tend not to think the essentials of movement as they are not applying the mechanisms that allow them to move from one place to another. The amount of energy required to walk at a comfortable place is very small in comparison with other activities (Everett and Kell, 2010). The study of De Wit et al, (2000) concluded that, running has become one of the most significant recreational activities in the past years.
Researches have focused on various running forms, such as shod and barefoot running conditions. There have been many arguments on the running techniques, regarding which method is more efficient in terms of shock absorption and reduce injuries. Liberman et al, (2012) sustained thatinjuries can be generated by both internal and external factors, such as body mass index (BMI), previous injuries and shoes, core strength and/or flexibility. Long distance running can cause injuries up to 70% per year. According to Edwards et al, (2012), shock absorption consists of peak magnitude and frequency of the acceleration produced by the impact.The correlation between the two studies explains to readers that different running forms are annexed. The gait cycle is known as the movement that starts when the heel touches the floor and continues until the same heel strikes the floor again (Everett & Kell, 2010). …show more content…
It is divided in two phases, the stance phase and the swing phase.
During the stance phase, the lower extremity is in contact with the ground. This phase is formed by 5 different stages (the Heel Strike, Foot Flat, Mid Stance, Heel Off and Toe Off) which form the whole movement. In contrast, during the swing phase, the current limb, is not in contact with the ground. This phase has three stages ( Acceleration, Mid Swing and Deceleration) that generates the entire movement.
• The aim of this study is to investigate the kinematic and kinetic differences in barefoot and shod running.
It has been hypothesized that there will be significant kinematic and kinetic differences between barefoot and shod running . It has been hypothesized that there will be no significant kinematic and kinetic differences between barefoot and shod running
Methods:
Participants:
The participants that took part on this study were 3 male students aged between 19-23 years old, with average height and weight. All three of them have similar fitness conditions, because they are currently exercising by going to the gym or playing sports such as football. None of the participants mentioned any health problems or physical injuries. Apparatus: QualisysOgus 3+ Motion Camera was used for the 2D kinematics recordings.+ Force platform Ground Force Kisler UK 926BA=> read Hamil et al Reflective markers on the bony landmarks of the hip(greater trochanter) knee(lateral epicondyle) ankle (lateral malleolus) and toe (5th metatarsal) for the 2D kinematics Procedures: The participants had to perform threeruns in both barefoot and shod conditions. They were required to wear shorts, because reflective markers were added on the bony landmarks of their hip (greater trochanter) knee (lateral epicondyle) ankle (lateral malleolus) and toe (5th metatarsal). Trials runs were given to the participants before the testing, to familiarize with the experiment. Additional time measures were noted of every trial and divided it by the