Drug Court Arguments

Great Essays
Drug Courts Drug courts are here to help those in need and establish a better society for this country. The first drug court began in Florida in 1989 because there was a lot of drug cases that were similar to each other, so instead of wasting the judge’s time, the government decided to create drug courts (History). Drug courts was a positive effect to this country, however, many people still do not like this idea of having a drug court. Drug courts has caused many arguments which created two sides, the side who are for drug courts and the side who are against drug courts; there are not many people who feel neutral about this certain situation. Drug courts are helpful and useful, but they can tend to hurt people or society. First and foremost …show more content…
Drug courts take away the rights from an American citizens. In the article, Want to Go to Drug Court? Say Goodbye to Your Rights by Mike Riggs, the author explains that when someone is caught with drugs they are given an option which is either go to jail for at least ten or five years or go to drug court for about a year and graduate the program, but if one cannot follow the programs rules and regulations they will still go to jail and have to suffer. One example of someone who went to jail for not complying with the rules was a woman named: Latisha Floyd who had two options; she was to either go to jail for having a gram of cocaine or sign up for drug court. She decided to sign up for the drug court. Floyd had transportation and money problems. She didn’t own a car nor didn’t have money to support her and her son. So she had to miss some important appointments and drug court payments. One day Floyd missed her probation appointment with her officer since she didn’t have a car, they ended up locking her up in jail for four years (Mike Riggs, 1). In this example one notices that drug courts do not understand the financial struggles someone is going through, so they sent this poor lady to jail because she could not pay for her drug test or make it to her appointment in time. There are many people who go to jail because of the same struggle this lady was going through. In another article Drug Courts: Enter At Your Own Risk, the author Margaret Dooley-Sammuli states that there is not enough evidence that drug courts has saved us money, reduce putting people into jail, or safety. Sammulli also explains that people who have relapse are the ones who suffer the most, because if the drug court catches an individual doing, the drug court will kick those individuals out of the program and send them to jail where they will be struggling and those individual have to suffer their drug addiction problems in jail. These are the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    are unsupported by the evidence” (137). While no statistics exist to prove that drug courts impact the amount of initial arrests, statistics do prove drug courts decrease the number of rearrests. In Jessica Huseman’s article “Drug Courts Are a Good Alternative for Drug Offenders” she reviews several scenarios in which individual or specific areas of drug courts have lowered to percentage of rearrests. In New York City, six drug courts decreased the number drug rearrests by twenty-nine percent for three years after the initial arrest. In Oregon, a single drug court reduced the amount of drug rearrests for thirteen years after the initial arrest by twenty-four perent.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The paper will discuss any pros and cons of these problem-solving courts known as drug treatment courts. Within this paper several studies based around drug treatment courts will be examined. The research gathered here came from Hamilton County…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Drug Court Model

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This paper written by Amanda B. Cissner and Michael Rempel, discusses what the drug courts are, a brief explanation when and how the drug courts got started, how do they work, and what do they do for the people who are given the treatment for their dug usage problems. In this review paper I’m going to explain what those points are and what do they mean to me in my own words. Drug courts was introduced in 1989 in Miami, it launched dramatic shift in how the court system responds to the criminal behavior of drug addicted defendants, by combining treatment with close supervision, the drug court model offered new alternative to the unproductive and costly cycle of addiction crime, and incarceration. In other ways it seems like they’re going to…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Court Research Paper

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drug courts are utilized by the criminal justice general sessions courts to try to end the abuse of drugs such as alcohol and substance. In drug court, it will allow the choice of the individual who may need that extra help to fight their addiction by offering to partake in a treatment program. If the individual successfully completes the program they are subject to getting their case dismissed. “In exchange for successful completion of the treatment program, the court may dismiss the original charge, reduce or set aside a sentence, offer some lesser penalty, or offer a combination of these” (NADCP, 1997). Drug courts generate surroundings that are clear and with certain principles.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead of treating this as a criminal issue, we should follow the example of countries like Portugal and Uruguay, who have been successful in their approach to treating drug-use and addiction as a health problem. By actually treating people as opposed to criminalizing them, we could decrease government spending on prisons and instead use the resources for…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study: Drug Courts

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drug courts constitute a clear example of an integrated public health and safety strategy that has shown promise for reducing drug use and recidivism rates. Drug courts are separate criminal courts providing supervised treatment for drug offenders as an alternative to incarceration. Drug courts provide offenders with intensive court supervision, mandatory drug testing, and substance abuse treatment. Successful completion of the program allows the offender to avoid incarceration, have their criminal charges reduced or dismissed, or have their sentences reduced. Those found not in compliance with the program rules typically receive a criminal drug conviction and may be sentenced to incarceration.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For example, Lindsay Lohan was in a car chase after the mother of her former personal assistant and was found to have cocaine with her. Overall, incarceration is a safer and more effective place for drug abusers because they can get the treatment they need during and after serving jail time and it will get them away from drugs until they are…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since an argument can be made that judges and attorneys are only fighting for what benefits them personally, some may feel that the push for drug courts isn’t ethical. If the judge or one of the attorney’s gets rewarded for sending people to drug courts then it’s not actually being used for the greater good. SAMHSA has this to say about how drug courts have changed what goes on in the court room: “Treatment drug courts, started in the late 1980s, have changed the adversarial nature of the prosecuting attorney, the defense attorney, and the judge in traditional court proceedings to a team approach. All parties are united in finding a way to meet public safety needs while addressing the treatment and recovery needs of the substance-using individual,” (Administration, 2006). Bibliography Administration, S. A. (2006, March/April).…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Courts Recidivism

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Due to the implications of Reagan's War on Drugs laws, drug courts have demonstrated and proven to reduce recidivism for offenders who abuse substances. To deter overcrowding in the prisons, Researcher Messer has found that drug courts can be instrumental in deterring offenders from reoffending. It is surprising that “85% of offenders incarcerated require substance abuse treatment” (Messer, 2016). Drug courts allow offenders to “attain important skills/ideas, improve relationships with family and children, a general educational development certificate, a driver’s license, and/or gainful employment” (Messer, 2016). Researcher Shaffer studied over “80 drug courts and found recidivism rates of 46% for those who participated in drug court programming”…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Court Observation

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Each of the people in the program also have a sponsor who supports them. Many people in the program even look forward to becoming sponsors one day themselves. The drug court was very interesting to me because it did not seem like a criminal proceeding but instead the people in the room who worked for the court seemed to be genuinely concerned for the well being of the people in recovery. I liked this aspect of the court because it made the court not so intimidating to…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Court Essay

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to NADCP (2015), “Drug courts keeping drug addicted offenders out of jail and in treatment has proven to reduce drug abuse and crime while saving money.” They significantly reduce drug use and crime and are more cost effective than other criminal justice…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Programs like these should be used to help the struggling ones and get them the help they need. 3. Using the justice system does not solve the problems of drug users. Going to prison often times does not help drug users stop using drugs. This is proven with the statistic that two-thirds of prisoners reoffend within three years of leaving prison accordin to The New Times.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You 're driving home after a long day at work, you look in your review mirror and hear the sirens: a cop is pulling you over. Now you 're sweating because you have 24 grams of weed in the cup holder. The cop begins to search your vehicle; finds the marijuana, and let 's you go. This scenario, is an example of what would happen if drugs were decriminalized in America. Contrary to this, would decriminalizing drugs in America have a negative effect on the nation, or an adverse one?…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The main disadvantage is that some people will try and abuse the system. The drug court is supposed to be for those who need help, usually will try to get help. The people who will abuse the court are the criminals who blame their actions on the drugs. For example, Joe has been stealing for years, and he has just recently been doing drugs. Joe has started trying to steal more and more to buy the drugs he wants.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The drug market is stronger than ever, yet the drug war has been in full force for several decades. The effects here in the United States, are quite similar to the effects internationally, but there are many solutions other than a drug war, to stop the use of drugs. Nobel laureate and economist Milton Friedman remarked on the issue, “However much harm drugs do to those who use them…seeking to prohibit their use does even more harm both to users of drugs and to the rest of us…Legalizing drugs would simultaneously reduce the amount of crime and improve law enforcement. It is hard to conceive of any other single measure that would accomplish so much to promote law and order” (Donohue 146). Friedman is right.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics