However, they still have opportunities for healthier eating. In Zinczenko's article, he implies that fast-food is unhealthy, but for kids who could only afford fast-food, there are still some healthier choices for them. Taco Bell would be the healthiest fast-food in the US because tacos contain vegetables, proteins, carbohydrates, and fats. People also could choose the non-fried corn tortillas instead of high calorie fried shells. Also, compare the menus with Taco Bell and McDonald's, a soft taco from Taco Bell will cost $1.29 (TacoBell.com), but a small French Fries from McDonald's will cost $1.39 (FastFoodMenuPrices)! Somebody may ask, what if there is no Taco Bell around? Actually, you can still go to McDonald's, there is something you can find which could be healthier. Through a research, an average teenage boy between eleven to thirteen years old should intake 1800 to 2600 calories per day (Roberta Duyff). A Pico Guacamole with Artisan Grilled Chicken has 550 calories, and a side salad has only 15 calories, versus a Pico Guacamole Buttermilk Crispy Chicken with 710 calories plus a Southwest Buttermilk Crispy Chicken salad with 520 calories would be much higher than the previous meal (mcdonalds.com). So if a boy needs to eat all three meals at McDonald's, 565 calories per meal, it will not be over the average calories which they need to …show more content…
If a person is overeating, even though they are eating healthy food, they will still prone to obesity after a period of time. My experience would be the best example. Under the 12-hour study per day and such great pressure, I chose to eat a lot of food to release my stress. My choice of overeating to release stress instead of doing exercises caused my weight increased a lot. Although I was eating those healthy foods which my grandmother made for me, I still could not stay at a healthy weight. This example shows that no matter how healthy a person is eating, without control the serving size, the person has a high chance of becoming