When these bans are put into place, the popularity of the breeds tends to go up with criminals and people who want the image of a tough person. People who do decide to have a dog of one of these breeds, tend to hide them and do not get the dogs the vaccinations that are needed to help protect the dog and the public. The responsible owners suffer because these bans cause the owners have to either give up their precious pets or move to another area altogether. These breed specific dog bans end up mainly punishing the responsible owners and their pets that have not shown aggression or bitten another animal or …show more content…
Breed specific dog bans are costly. Taxpayers should not have to have their taxes raised for a ban that is ineffective. There are too many other options than wasting money on these bans, like enforcing the laws already in place. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, ASPCA, states other options are to increase the availability of low-cost sterilization, to focus on the behaviors of the dogs and their owners, and to have penalties that become harsher for dogs that are found to be dangerous. (“Aspca.org/animal-cruelty”). Dogsbite.org claims that breed specific dog bans do work. They state that multiple cities’ pit bull dog bites decreased significantly. The claims might be true if everyone followed the bans on the breeds, but this is simply not the case. A study of a ban, started in 2005, showed that in 2010 there was not a decrease of dog bites in the Province of Ontario, Canada. (“nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com”). This study of a breed specific dog ban is only one of many showing that these bans are not effective against dog bites and