Divine Command Theory Essay

Great Essays
The Divine command theory is a meta - ethical theory which states that an action is obligatory if and only if, it is commanded by God. In this essay, I will examine whether any form of divine command theory is defensible. In defence, I shall begin by looking at the modified theory as proposed by Robert Adams. Secondly, I will attempt to assess objections from Plato, Austin and Wainwright; before proceeding to evaluate whether these objections are successful in demeaning this theory.

Let us take the modified version of the divine command theory , as proposed by Robert Adams (1987); in defence of the original theory. Whilst many acts can be seen as being wrong purely because they are against the will of God; perhaps this is not the only reason
…show more content…
This suggests that no action can be held as being morally good unless God commands it. However a major problem with this is that Gods commands are seen to be arbitrary. There is no moral reason for Gods will, as he invents morality. This leaves morality with no rational structure. We can exemplify this with the following example; God commands that one should honour and respect their mother and father, and this is morally right. However, if God had commanded the opposite; it would have been equally right not to respect our parents. The decision of commanding respect is not made for a reason, it is arbitrary. If there was a reason, then this takes us back to the first question asked by Socrates. The reason makes the act morally right to do, and God recognises this. Furthermore, raising the idea that morality is independent. This calls in to question God’s ability to give moral …show more content…
The reason for why God commands something is this love and it would be logically impossible for God to command something which would go against his character. Therefore, morality cannot be held as being unstructured. However, this is not a sufficient defence of the theory, as we could respond by saying that if God had loved something else, murder for example; then morality would be different to what we have now.

Secondly, Socrates second horn destroys the validity of God being Good (Law, 2015). If something is good because it is the will of God, then God is Good because this is his will. However, this is an empty tautology. We cannot recognise what it means to praise God for his goodness. It would suggest nothing other than God willing whatever he wants to. Adams objects to this, arguing that a statement such as 'God is Good ' should be understood metaphysically rather than morally. In a metaphysical sense, it would simply mean that God has all good

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Adam and Eve likewise dedicated a transgression of use, and God rejects them also. Edmund's greed for the…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In essence, God decides morality, the basis of right and wrong. If God says something is right then it is morally right; if God says something is wrong then it also is morally wrong. However, flaws in this theory have caused many people to deny it and believe in Saint Thomas Aquinas Theory of Natural Law. This theory is divided into three parts: the world has values and views built into its nature, describe not only how things are but also how they ought to be, and how do we determine what is tight and wrong. The two theories are opposite in terms of viewpoint but in today's world, but of them are rejected because of conflicting issues.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many opponents of the Divine Command Theory but very few have plausible arguments. Bertrand Russell argues that if piety is because of God’s authorization, then to God “there is no difference between right and wrong” and because of this, Russell says it cannot be said that God is good (Russell 12). He also says that in order to say that God is good, one must agree that morality and immorality have meaning separate from God’s authorization because “God's fiats are good and not good independently of the mere fact that he made them” (12). One valid point Russell brings up is that to assume God is good would mean that He is unable to command anything that is evil. This argument allows that God can haphazardly change whether an action is moral or not.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many theists claim that morality does not in fact reach farther than God’s commandments. Proponents of the Divine Command Theory maintain that morality is based solely on religion, and that everything God commands is good simply because God commanded it. However, if everything God says becomes automatically morally good, the meaning of the word “moral” is lost. Therefore, this theory “makes right and wrong subject to God’s whims, which makes it impossible for God to be non-trivially good” (Lecture 9/28). Without a separation between morality and God’s commandments, there would be no way to know the true nature of morality.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article written by Robert Merrithew Addams, A Modified Divine Command Theory of Ethical Wrongness, expresses a unique view of the Divine Command Theory in which Addams has modified to answer certain controversial issues. The main controversy being towards the theory’s implications of ethical wrongness and the different situations it can be applied. In Plato’s, Euthyphro, the controversy can be seen through the statement, “… nor the pious the same as the god-loved,” (70). This argument presents questions of what applies towards someone’s beliefs in God. Furthermore, the original theory, according to Addams, implies a connection between “wrong,” and “contrary towards God’s commands,” (39).…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguably the most influential philosopher to emerge from Ancient Greece, Socrates was widely despised throughout his lifetime for his incessant search to find a man with more wisdom than he. Socrates was subjected to trial on the charges of impiety and corruption of the youth and was ultimately deemed guilty by the jury. Plato recounts Socrates’ lengthy speech of defense and his subsequent sentence to execution in his dialogue, The Apology. Regardless of his innocence or guilt, however, the verdict of Socrates’ execution is the most appropriate outcome of the trial. In his plea for acquittal, Socrates unwittingly proposes a more compelling argument in support of his own execution rather than against it.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil and Omnipotence In Evil and Omnipotence, J.L. Mackie presents fallacious solutions that try solving the logical problem of evil. Fallacious solutions explicitly maintain all their propositions, but implicitly end up rejecting at least one of them. The fourth fallacious solution (S4), claims that moral evil is necessary in any world containing the overriding good of human freedom. In this paper, I will demonstrate: (I) S4; (II) Mackie’s objection of S4; (III) A primary benefit of Mackie’s argument; and (IV) Why Mackie’s criticism succeeds. (I) S4:…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    how little does the common herd know of the nature of right and truth. A man must be an extraordinary man and have made great strides in wisdom, before he could have seen his way to this” (p. 3). This quote from Socrates comes after he asks Euthyphro what he is doing on the porch of King Archon. Euthyphro responds by telling Socrates that he is there to bring up a charge of murder against his father. When Socrates points out that, according to accepted beliefs, it is wicked to harm or bring disgrace on one’s father, Euthyphro counters that that makes no difference.…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Divine Command Theory explains that actions are good if and only if God commands them, and actions are bad if and only if God forbids them. This makes the Divine Command Theory independent of human thought and feeling, it is God who determines what actions are moral. If we were to disobey God that would be an immoral thing to do and thus, we would be punished. We are motivated to follow this theory because it is the only reason why we still follow moral laws.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Protagoras, a Greek thinker and teacher, while commenting about his affliction to human reasoning and logic, quipped, “Man is the measure of all things.” (Jowett, 1871, p. 17) Just as Protagoras held this philosophy, and the reliance of man to act as man, it is unlikely he could have ever known how Socrates, some many years later, would prove him right. This affirmation was best evidenced by the philosophical argument held between Socrates and Euthyphro regarding man’s moral obligations, and holiness.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue Gorgias, Socrates argues against Polus an ancient Greek orator, that tyrants and orators do not, in fact do what they want, instead they do what they see fit. As a result of this claim, Socrates believes tyrants and orators have the least power in their cities. This paper will primarily argue Socrates’s views through the definition of power, who holds the “real” power, that some things are inherently bad, and that there are different views of morality. The argument that Socrates sets forth states “If a person does whatever he sees most fit to do when he lacks intelligence, is this still ‘having power?’”…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article “Evil and Omnipotence,” J.L. Mackie explores the various adequate and fallacious solutions to the “problem of evil,” a problem in which “God is omnipotent; God is wholly good; and yet evil exists” (p. 119). While Mackie discusses, analyzes, and criticizes many solutions, including “good cannot exist without evil” (p. 120) and “evil is necessary as a means to good” (p. 122), my paper will solely focus on Mackie’s response to the fallacious solution that “evil is due to human free will” (p. 123), which begins “first I must query” on p. 124. This paper will formally extract, justify, critically evaluate, and engage with Mackie’s argument that existence of evil due to free will is erroneous. Mackie describes the free will…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lest we forget, we are not the supreme masters of our fate. Only God is sovereign. He has created a moral universe in which the law of cause-and-effect is a certainty. Morality includes a person’s standard of conduct or daily practice.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The point is that the choice of things being wrong or right are up for discussion. Some people may not believe in the bible or even religion at all, which means that whatever is in there, they may not believe is morally correct or incorrect unless they have made that decision themselves, not just because it is in the bible or other sacred texts. But, there are also a lot of things prohibited by law that aren’t technically “wrong” or at least not in some people’s opinion. Going back to segregation, when it was against the law to have blacks mix with whites, this was a law, but it was never morally wrong to mix both races together. Mixing the races doesn’t hurt others in the end.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why would it be right for him to commit immoral acts and for us not to? This also gives unrighteous justice to people who commit crimes in the name of God. If God gave us morality, religious choices would be clearer. For example, topics like gay marriage and abortion are commonly debated upon.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics