There are differences in public and private collective bargaining. In particular, there are differences between the ways the agreement is caring out. For instance, collective bargaining in the private sector influences by market forces. The primary concentration is on profit. As a business owner, you want your profit was higher than the expenses. The competition and amount of responsibilities create pressure and many factors like benefits and additional attractive elements are not available to employees in the private sector. The public sector, on the other hand, influences by political force. For instance, many services that provided by federal divisions might not be available from any other organizations. There are no competitors and public sector has a monopoly in the market. The main difference includes the financing aspect. For instance, if a private employer has low productivity, the company is going out of business. The public sector during challenging times will be supported by taxes and fees of the workers. The bargaining in the public sector is that government is not a business. The public-sector employees work for government organizations, the law permits these workers certain rights that private sector employees don’t have. The union representation is limited to private sector, especially to small businesses.
…show more content…
The job security is an additional concern. Since most employees are “at-will”, which means they can quit their jobs or get fires with or without reason at any time. The public sector can’t fire, demote, or discipline workers at least there is a reason or a misdemeanor. For instance, the government employees need to present reasons for firing, while privet sector workers won’t have the reason. The private employer can take actions and discipline workers. These employees won’t have representation or support. The public workers will have support and representation from the union who support employees’ rights. Sometimes paying dues for union membership is worth it because people get more job security and support. During the bargaining, the public employees will have an open negotiation, which can highlight TV news, the private sector’s negotiations might not even exist. The authority to commit the collective bargaining agreement can be shared by the executive and legislative branches, and sometimes three parties will involve in the negotiation. The privet sector negotiation usually includes a key player, like an owner who is a solo decision maker. The Sunshine laws won’t be promoted in the private sector while this law is a requirement for the public sector where open negotiation exist. The bargaining patterns are also different. For example, in public sector only one government’s bargaining stance with multiple unions like public health workers or fire and polis department. The visible benefit, equal treatment, which will be granted to one group will be given to all. “ME TOO” is a …show more content…
In fact, according to statistics, the salaries and benefits of the government employees are much higher than private-sector workers. Even though there are many positive aspects of the public sector, some negative factors exist. Unions represent a force that can provide political support. For example, some officials will use their power and maintain the payroll more government employees just to get support. Some rules require many states to have collective bargaining for public employees. In fact, there is evidence when local governments were forced to find ways how to cut costs, but continuing to provide
The job security is an additional concern. Since most employees are “at-will”, which means they can quit their jobs or get fires with or without reason at any time. The public sector can’t fire, demote, or discipline workers at least there is a reason or a misdemeanor. For instance, the government employees need to present reasons for firing, while privet sector workers won’t have the reason. The private employer can take actions and discipline workers. These employees won’t have representation or support. The public workers will have support and representation from the union who support employees’ rights. Sometimes paying dues for union membership is worth it because people get more job security and support. During the bargaining, the public employees will have an open negotiation, which can highlight TV news, the private sector’s negotiations might not even exist. The authority to commit the collective bargaining agreement can be shared by the executive and legislative branches, and sometimes three parties will involve in the negotiation. The privet sector negotiation usually includes a key player, like an owner who is a solo decision maker. The Sunshine laws won’t be promoted in the private sector while this law is a requirement for the public sector where open negotiation exist. The bargaining patterns are also different. For example, in public sector only one government’s bargaining stance with multiple unions like public health workers or fire and polis department. The visible benefit, equal treatment, which will be granted to one group will be given to all. “ME TOO” is a …show more content…
In fact, according to statistics, the salaries and benefits of the government employees are much higher than private-sector workers. Even though there are many positive aspects of the public sector, some negative factors exist. Unions represent a force that can provide political support. For example, some officials will use their power and maintain the payroll more government employees just to get support. Some rules require many states to have collective bargaining for public employees. In fact, there is evidence when local governments were forced to find ways how to cut costs, but continuing to provide