Differences Of Tsar And Lenin's Government In Russia

Improved Essays
As World War 1 goes to the end, Russia gets to an informal situation. The leader of Russia who was Tsar was ruling the country in a wrong way. After the corruption of Tsar, Lenin who is part of the Bolsheviks comes up and rules the country. He comes up with a government that will give land and takes care of the country. As a result, Lenin became a leader who made Russia a stable country. Lenin’s government was overall more different than Tsar’s government for many important reasons. The main differences were the living conditions between the peasants and the workers, rights that people had, and how they deal with the oppositions.

The peasants and workers living conditions during Lenin’s government were different comparing to Tsar’s government.
…show more content…
The most basic way both Tsar and Lenin used to punish the opposites was to get them out of the country or hang them. During Tsar's government, there were three particular groups that were opposite Tsar. The ‘Cadets’ who were the middle-class people, Socialist Revolutionaries, and Bolsheviks Mensheviks which were the Social Democratic Party. They were big and unstoppable so Tsar made a secret police called ‘Okhrana’. They were the spies who murdered and exiled the oppositions. A few years later, revolution finally happened and the Winter Palace got surrounded. On the Sunday 22 January 1905, a huge amount of protesters came to the Winter Palace to say their hopes to Tsar. But the only thing the soldiers did was to fire without any warning or sign. So from this reaction, Tsar was very decisive and clear with punishing and controlling the opposite. Lenin also had opposite who he had to control of. He also exiled people and hang some people who were hating Lenin. As he wants peace in the country and gives equal chances, he controls the opposite in a peaceful condition. “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”(Lenin) This quote from Lenin shows that he controlled the opposition by controlling their government by plan and not be bothered any of these attacks. So the way the Lenin’s government controlled opposites are also different to Tsar.

By looking at the three main points on the differences and similarities the Tsar’s government and the Lenin’s government had, Lenin’s governments is overall more different than Tsar’s government. Lenin was more caring the people and changing the rules while Tsar did not. Also, how they controlled the human rights and the oppositions were different. In overall, Lenin’s government was different to Tsar’s government and this made Russia able to become a better country out of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the year 1917, multiple revolutions took place including the october revolution and the february revolution. The cause for these revolutions is to end imperial rule from other interfering countries. The reason why the russian revolution started was because people were unhappy with their king, Nicholas 2 who believed in government corruption. Once the Russian Revolution started people started to gain more support and more benefits from the government. One reason why the russian revolution of 1917 have the support of the people because the revolution mostly benefited the working class.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Vladimir Lenin, founder of the Russian Communist Party, and the Bolsheviks believed that violent revolution was the only way to overturn the government and avoid further development of liberalism in Russia. The authoritarian bent in Lenin’s thinking only got stronger and the Soviet Union became a dictatorship with a ruling central government. In the years following the death of Vladimir Lenin in 1924, Stalin rose to become the leader of…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both men viewed democracy as a way for bias to occur towards one side of their country, so they decided to control it themselves. In Lenin’s case, Russia had “Almost three years of civil war that followed, and The Bolsheviks were victorious and assumed total control of the country” (“Vladimir Lenin, BBC). Once this happened, as leader of the Bolsheviks Lenin made himself leader of Russia. While in control, Lenin was a cruel leader often punishing or taking goods from people for no real reason. For example, when the government was “Lacking funds or goods to exchange against grain needed to feed the Red Army and the towns, Lenin instituted a system of requisitioning grain surpluses without compensation” (Britannica).…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How far was Rasputin responsible for the collapse of the Tsarist regime? The Tsarist regime collapsed in March 1917 when Nicholas II abdicated. By the time of the abdication the Tsarist regime had already been damaged by a number of factors that could be held responsible for the overall downfall of Tsar Nicholas II. One of these factors is the influence that Rasputin, a monk who convinced the Tsarina that he could cure her son of his haemophilia.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1700s The Enlightenment

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This not only saw the rise of the ideology of socialism but it also shaped the Russia that followed afterwards. The Russia that followed was shaped by the Bolsheviks winning the revolution rather than the democratic provisional government winning…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lenin, albeit due to a forced hand, seeks to bring agricultural industrialization by re-introducing capitalistic practices, while Stalin wants to increase the State influence in the agricultural sector by using the model of large State-run farms to encourage peasants to join them to share in the profits brought by economies of…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In November 1917, the Bolsheviks, a group looking for power in Russia, stormed the Winter Palace and arrested members of the provisional government. Eventually, the Bolsheviks gained complete control in Russia, especially after their Red Army won the Russian Civil War. Lenin was the original leader of the Bolsheviks, and he established the Soviet Union. This union was comprised of individual “soviets”-communist governments that ruled over certain areas of Russia. But, in 1928, Josef Stalin seized total…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The October Revolution: Coup or Social Uprising? Historians along the century have questioned the veracity of the narrative the Bolsheviks fed to the people of Russia and the rest of the world. These historians claim that the communist party has distorted the facts of said revolution to control masses during the Soviet reign. The overthrow of the Provisional Government in October 1917 was both a Bolshevik-engineered coup d’état and a popular revolution. Chroniclers have debated this statement owing to the fact that said people come from different socio-political backgrounds and the varying historiographies of individual authors.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question of why the autocratic tsarist state of Russia fell is complex and has been interpreted in a variety of ways by historians. The fall began with the 1905 Revolution, on January 9th, or “Bloody Sunday” when a group of demonstrating workers with grievances for the Tsar were fired on by troops. Tsar Nicholas II agreed to concessions including the establishment of a State Duma. Despite these concessions, conflict and pressure continued leading to the final collapse of the tsarist system with the Revolution of 1917. Historians have answered the question of why tsarism fell in different ways.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After it ended, Lenin wanted to expand the communist/socialist ideas throughout Europe but Stalin, after taking power, industrialized the country. The government that he established after the revolution was great for economics and politics and leads to a powerful and economically strong country, with just leaders. But it also lead to the Cold War and many other internal conflicts. Both, the Mexican and the Russian Revolution had many evident differences.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nationalism In Russia

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In1917 Russia a rocky country and not very stable. They were unable to accommodate with Tsar Nicholas II having just been over thrown and were in desperate need of help. The second revolution developed the Marxist Bolsheviks who were a communist party that looked to gain more freedom and justice for themselves. The Russians exhibited many internal problems while trying to establish the country. Russia was also struggling to find a strong political leader and government system that could provide guidance and bring the country together.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Politically changes in attitudes threatened the autocratic rule of Tsar, many had heard of democracy and civil liberties from their appearances in Western Europe, thus leading to the formation of several political parties with various anti-autocratic ideologies, including the Socialist Democratic Party (of which a faction later become the Bolsheviks (Source B). The Bolsheviks in particular played a big role in the revolution and Russia society in the early 20th century, with ideology rooted in socialism and the belief that revolution was the only way to overthrow the tsarist rule, the Bolsheviks spent much of the years prior to the Tsars abdication working to undermine his rule. It is these changes which many historians attribute to reasons for the fall of the dynasty, suggesting that Russian political attitudes were no longer compatible with an autocratic political…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 1905 Revolution began on January 9th, or “Bloody Sunday” when a group of demonstrating workers with grievances for the Tsar were fired on by troops For Fitzpatrick, the causes of the fall of tsarism were both social and economic. In her understanding the fall of Tsarism was essentially inevitable. She writes, “The regime was so vulnerable to any kind of jolt or setback that it is hard to imagine that it could have survived long, even without the [First World] War.” The faults of the system, in her interpretation, were built into society.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political: Russia was being ruled by an absolute and despotic monarchy , where the will of the sovereign (great King) considered the law as it was. The king thus had unlimited power; ruled arbitrarily, without giving anyone their acts of sin and respect the freedoms and rights of…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the first socialist country in the world, Russia had a lengthy and tough time to change and develop the country in 1917. The Russian Revolution of 1917 covers the major events such as the February Revolution and the October Revolution that result in the established of the Soviet Union. The Russian Revolution caused the encounter of labors and people. Their sacrifices and protests eventually made the revolution come true. Since the socialist government overthrew the czarist government, there were both political and economic exchanges occurred in the revolution.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays