Differences Between Communism And Anarchism

Anarchism is the idea that all social actions exists without government interference or services. Communism, on the other hand, is Anarchism's polar opposite: it is a system in which government exerts strong control over many services—including amounts that societal members can earn. This paper will: explain both societal systems; it will then point out some differences between the two societies; finally I will argue that anarchy is not practical, and will provide one method in which societies can keep their respective authorities accountable for their authorities' actions. Anarchism is the political idea, that strives to diminish government inferences on society's individuals. After all, anarchy is justified as, free from master/sovereign. …show more content…
We all would love to have this way of government, free from corruption. Although, if it were to become a reality, it would be complete chaos. Of course, individuals don’t want to be dominated, but at the same time its unsafe. Anarchism would only bring violence and danger, to many people. It leaves room for others to interfere with others lives. If there was no government, there would be no government sponsored utilities such as, welfare, programs, healthcare, schooling, national defense, armies and prisons. Personally, I wouldn’t want to live in an environment where id constantly be afraid, and no one could do anything about it, unless It was by choice. Not only that factor, but there are many government sponsored programs, that are very relevant to many. I think a government infringement, comes with positive and negative effects. But the positive effects, far exceed the negative effects. If there were to be an anarchy, I think it would require personal responsibility. It would depend upon the individuals need to keep from infringing on others lives, and keep personal desires such as, greed, envy and violence in check for it to be somewhat