Difference Between Theology And Theology

Improved Essays
Science and Theology——A Battle No One Loses
The dispute between theology and science lasts for ages. Theology once dominated the mainstream during the Medieval period. However, starting from the 16th century, with the rapid development of science, the authority of theology had been challenged and had declined ever since. In this reflective journal, I’ll discuss the difference and similarities of theology and science. In addition, the reason that science gained its authority will also be further explained.
Science and theology, despite their different ways of recognizing the world, their fates have been twisted with each other. Newton, who was born in an era dominated by the Christian church, was a great reflection of how science and theology combined with each other. As a son of the seventeenth century, he had a deep concern of the religious matters. Astonishingly, his achievements on science was not influenced by his religious beliefs. Newton published Principia in 1687. In this book, he described his comprehension to the system of the world and proposed the principles of force and motion. He showed us how general movements in our daily life apply to the broader world. Under this criteria, he should be considered a physicist and mathematician. However, he revealed his confusion of the original force that pushed the Earth. He believed that there should be a force to push the planets at the first place otherwise they would fell vertically. He argued that no nature power can lead to this transverse motion. In his old ages, he turned to theology to find his answer. He said in his letter to theologian Richard Bentley that he thought such Principles might be the masterpiece of the Deity(Cohen, 1995). Newton tried to use theology to explain the things that cannot be solved by science. Likewise, although a huge number of scientists believe in God, they believed in the God that created the laws of the cosmos. From Newton’s experience, I think both science and theology provide us ways to find the true meaning of the world. Although we are born in an era that science is the main fashion, theology still is a way of explaining the world beyond science and would not be replaced. In addition, the main differences of science and theology lie in their ways of recognizing the world. According to Russell, science is first to discover some particular facts about the world, and then finds the laws behind these facts. Eventually, finding laws connecting facts with one another makes it possible to predict future occurrences(Russell, 2010). Religions, however, are more absolute, they make assertions on universe, humans and nature. I argue that this is the reason why theology lost its authority after the 16th century. With the development of science, the theories in science could be proved in real life. Take the famous astronomer Halley as an example, he observed the cycle of a comet’s orbit and then successfully proved the return of this comet 76 years later, which was named after him. His prediction was so precise that it inspired more people to learn astronomy(Howell, n.d.).

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    People tend to lean to one side or the other. In the field where spirituality and science does not coexist, Jahren creates a way to study and respect both for the greater good of all people. Jahren realizes she is a part of something much bigger. She uses that knowledge to drive her studies and prepare a way for future generations of scientists and even just people who enjoy the aspects nature. Jahren writes about her humbling, bold…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Galileo highlights the absurdity in the belief that “the same God who has furnished us with sense, language, and intellect would want to bypass their use” and, instead, blindly follow the teachings of scripture that scholars could independently collect or even perfect (106). The letter to Castelli displays the overwhelming confidence of Galileo and an equally powerful dismissal of religious opposition, as he knows they could not disprove his opinions reason and ultimate…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author contradicts himself. At the same time he argues that the strength of religion was from observed phenomena and when scientific discoveries uncover the mystery, the faith in religion has declined. As a physicist, he has put forward his opinion but the strength of science is only to that physical explanation and human with limited knowledge are trying to make people believe on it. The author completely forgets that Newton’s belief on religion has made it possible to postulate the laws of motion. Why does the author talk about the philosophical things when he is a physicist who has other mysteries to unveil to support science rather than reject religion?…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When scientists questioned against that theory, devoted followers of the Catholic Church criticized them saying that they believe that science is more important than God. In…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To start, scientific views have changed as they started to become less influenced by religion. One of the more well-known scientists to begin resisting the church control while limiting religious influences in his work was Galileo. Galileo made his discoveries by using a telescope and was determined to prove that the heliocentric model of the universe was correct, while trying to not go against and disprove the church and the teachings of the Bible (Galileo on Nature, Scripture, and Truth, pg. 391). Galileo believed that nature and the Bible could co-exist peacefully without much contradiction, but also made a point that the Bible could…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The view of the world was altered through the Scientific Revolution’s intellectual developments. Ideas were proposed to Europeans offering a different way of understanding through logical thinking and scientific methods. Conflicts occurred due to the interference of philosophers’ theories and religion’s teachings. Although theology remained to be valued and well respected, the works of scientists during the sixteenth and seventeenth century were influenced by the authority of the church, as well as the support of political and religious leaders. In addition, the common lack of knowledge impacted passionate scientists throughout the era.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In modern times religion and science are increasingly becoming viewed as incompatible, or at least non-overlapping. Damien Keown states that “Scientific discoveries, and theories such as evolution, have challenged many traditional Christian teachings…” at the expense of making them appear “...dogmatic, irrational, and backward-looking” (119). Despite its brief history in the West, Buddhism has gained increasing popularity in part due to its frequent portrayal as an exception to the conflict between scientific and spiritual thought. Proponents of this view—deemed “Buddhist Modernists” or “Secular Buddhists”—argue that Buddhism possesses certain qualities which make it compatible with a secular view of the world, while providing a source of purpose…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern day, science seems to (or sometimes attempts to) trump the Christian Bible in every way for some. It’s as if modern science can’t see similarities or agreements between the two, so one must choose one or the other. In John H. Walton’s “Human Origins and The Bible,” he explains that the Bible does not contain any kind of “scientific revelation” and whatever science is within the Bible would have been general knowledge for everyone. But in our present day of the 21st century, many feel that science and the Bible must work together somehow, but with all of the answers science is providing, it feels like an attack on our beliefs.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reading I chose is the introduction to Chapter 1 of the book Beginnings of Western Science. It concerns the term “science” and, therefore, the debate over whether or not science existed before 1450 A.D. The controversy according to the author, David Lindberg, arises out of the many different definitions for “science.” He said, “. . .we have no choice but to accept a diverse set of meanings as legitimate and do our best to determine from the context of usage what the term ‘science’ means on a specific occasion” (Lindberg 2).…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human beings all over the world struggle to coalesce scientific Western view from a primitive spiritual point of view. Large groups of scientists turn their nose up at primitive points of view, establishing their own views as the only opinion that can be correct, while the primitive fights to just be heard. Vine Deloria Jr. examines the differing views throughout his book, “The Metaphysics of Modern Existence”, and establishes that the primitive view is not to be discounted in our current day and age. It is through acceptance of both primitive and scientific that we will be able to fully understand our world and our place in this metaphysical world. Vine Deloria Jr. provides an elucidation of what is lacking in our world:…

    • 1120 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientific Revolution Dbq

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Science started to attract followers that believed its theories that opposed to those of the church, while religion was just faith. Many were working aside from the church’s beliefs and making way for science to explain the secrets of the unknown. During this time not only did scientific areas prosper, but also areas in economic and governmental views. Philosopher demanded exemption of speech and the press, and they criticized the strict censorship that most governments exercised. They started to believe censorship was harmful because it prevented people from learning about fresh ideas.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Besides, most of the astronomers and scientists who contribute to these findings were religious men who certainly had no intention to attack the underlying theology. For example, Galileo was a God-fearing Catholic and when the pope threatened to excommunicate him, he recanted his statements which evoked belief in the heliocentric Copernican model. Moreover, many philosophers and scientists have gone to great lengths trying to accommodate their scientific findings with their personal theology; Protestantism or Catholicism. Religionists have therefore been seeking to reconcile science and religion. Moreover, the new breed of scholars asserts that religion, especially Christianity is the actual cause of science’s existence (Seiler).…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, in eighteenth century thought, God remains the restraining, ultimate power that appears in Paradise Lost. The laws of motion and universal gravitation set forth by Newton are also taken as part of God’s commands that harmonise and govern the cosmos. Thus, scientific reason and faith are conflated in Alexander Pope’s Epigraph to Newton: Nature and Nature’s laws lay hid in night: God…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is creationism science, pseudoscience, or non-science? Support your argument with an analysis of the distinction between science, pseudoscience, and non-science. Mainstream society is very familiar with the word “science” and that without a doubt science plays a detrimental role in our lives. However for many people there seems to be a discrepancy about the correct distinguishiment between science, pseudo-science and non-science. The aims of this essay are to establish the differences between science, pseudo-science and non-science, before then examining the appropriate categorization of “creationism science”.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While science aims to explain particular events and generalizations with the laws of nature, religion aims to explain the same things without being confined to the laws of nature. Religion seeks supernatural explanations to explain the phenomena that science cannot including global why questions, necessary beings, and why the laws of nature are so simple. The conversation between religion and science is often seen as a conflicting debate but Instead of dismissing science and religion as conflicting schools of thought, it is important to acknowledge that they are founded upon entirely different schools of thought. I believe that the problem lies within the extremist notions of religion and science that aim to establish their respective schools of thought as the ultimate authority, and not religion and science itself.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays