Disparate Treatment: Illegal Discrimination Case Study

Improved Essays
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act brought about two chief concepts of illegal discrimination. These concepts are disparate treatment and disparate impact (Harper, 2016). This section of the Civil Rights Act makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an employee based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Individuals cannot lawfully be denied employment opportunities or have their employment adversely affected merely because of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin (EEOC Website, 2016).
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal to discriminate against an employee or potential employee and enforced the legal theory of disparate treatment. Disparate treatment exists when an employee
…show more content…
Costa. The decision by the United States Supreme Court in this case clears up the standard of proof that is necessary for plaintiffs to be successful in obtaining a mixed-motive instruction under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991. The Supreme Court ruled that direct evidence was not required. Before this decision, plaintiffs in such "mixed-motive" cases, i.e., a case in which an employer had both legitimate and illegitimate reasons for making an employment decision, were only successful in getting their cases heard if they had direct evidence of discrimination, now they are no longer required to present direct evidence, but can present evidence of any type. As a result, it is now easier for plaintiffs to have their discrimination cases seen before a jury.
In Desert Palace v. Costa, the plaintiff, Catherine Costa, claimed she was terminated for a legitimate reason (a physical altercation in a warehouse elevator) and an illegitimate reason (her gender). Costa had a history of problems with management and co-workers that eventually led to disciplinary actions being taken against her by employer. Costa’s involvement in a physical altercation with a male co-worker led to her termination from Desert Palace. Both employees were disciplined but because of the male employees clean disciplinary record he only received a five-day
…show more content…
Costa there is an increased possibility that an employer may be found liable of discrimination if an employee brings a mixed-motive case against them. Due to the increased likelihood of being found liable employers should take all possible steps to avoid any discrimination claims. They should clearly communicate with all employees their policy against unlawful employment discrimination and harassment. The information should be circulated throughout the workplace on a regular basis and strictly enforced by managers and supervisors. Employers should also carefully review all possible terminations for discriminatory treatment before actual

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Logan tells her boss, Diego, told her and five other women that they were his top employees, but none of them would be offered promotional opportunities with the company. When asked for an explanation, Diego told them that some of his traditional clients told him they would refuse to work with women, and if any of those clients decided to take their work to another vendor, he would suffer a significant economic loss. Issues 1. Could the client sue the company for sexual discrimination. 2.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In regards to the Dothard v. Rawlinson case the Supreme Court, in a 7-2 decision, affirmed that the height and weight requirement for employment violated Title Vll, which prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, and religion (AAUW, n.d.). It was show that these requirements would exclude 41 percent of females in the nation, and could not show that these requirements were job related (Dothard v. Rawlinson, n.d.). This case stems from Dianne Rawlinson being denied a position as a correctional officer because she did not meet the height and weight requirements of 5 feet 2 inches and a minimum of 120 pounds (Dothard v. Rawlinson, n.d.). When viewed at from a perspective of what…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title VII is supposed to protect employee discrimination among all employees despite the sexual orientation. It is clear that there should be an equal employment for men, women, and the LGBT community. A lot of the states have conducted a law that…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kathleen Bosko

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Latowski, the defendant claims that the plaintiff’s employment was terminated because she had a lifting restriction due to her pregnancy. The plaintiff disputes this proffered reason by claiming that discriminatory statements made against her show the actual motivation for her termination was in fact her pregnancy. This is very similar to the current case because even though the Defendant has stated that the travel accommodations were denied to the plaintiff because she lacked seniority, made her request after Johnathon Myers, and because no other Master Sculptor was available to complete the project, there were also discriminatory remarks made by Kathleen Bosko. These comments were made right after the Plaintiff requested accommodations and included Bosko reminding the Plaintiff that as a Master Sculptor at Bosko Arts Inc,, she holds a “plum position” in the art world and enjoys “steady employment and employment benefits.” Furthermore, in the case of Latowski, the remarks were made by individuals who were involved in or could influence the decision making of the adverse employment conduct, namely Judy Doyle and Rick Ackerman.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Title Vii Case Study

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was created by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individuals against employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. Title VII applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including state and local governments, employment agencies, labor organizations, and the federal government. Title VII also prohibits employment decisions based on stereotypes and presumptions about traits, abilities, or the performance of the individuals of a certain racial group. In June of the 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Executive Order 8802, in which prohibited any type of discrimination based on color, race,…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, and religion. It generally applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including federal, state, and local governments (Justia, 2017). Employment policies and practices may be discriminatory under Title VII based on disparate treatment or disparate impact. Disparate impact is often referred to as unintentional discrimination, whereas disparate treatment is intentional. Disparate treatment claims are those where the plaintiff alleges he or she is the victim of intentional discrimination by their employer.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Re Gault Case Study

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1)Equal Opportunity Act of 1972 enforces federal laws prohibiting workplace discrimination. The EEOC was created by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The employment section of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, known as Title VII, prohibits discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, and religion, and also prohibits employers from retaliating against any employee who exercises his or her rights under Title VII. Today, the EEOC enforces federal anti-discrimination statutes, and provides oversight and coordination of all federal equal opportunity regulations, policies, and practices.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    from being able to have certain jobs options. Now in this case it can be true today that people are discriminated, but as of now it is illegal to discriminate someone from having a job due to race, sex, religion, etc. In 1964 in order to fight for and protect our equal employment opportunities, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was created by the Civil Rights Act, Title VII (EEOC.GOV). This act is what made it illegal to discriminate against any persons for a job opportunity. Along with having equal job opportunities, since women's rights and feminism came on the rise, times have really changed and have eliminated the needs for the…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Health Policy Case Study

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1) From the case study, provide one example of each of the forms that public policies can take: laws, rules or regulations, other implementation decisions, and judicial decisions. Law: Social Security Amendment of 1965 is a public law 89-96. It was created to aid senior citizens with health insurance (Medicare) and to provide health care to indigent population and disabled (Medicaid). Rules/Regulations:…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, a federal law called, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, and religion. Typically in most cases it applies to employers with 15 or more employees. This law does include federal, state, and local governments, but it does not include educational centers or educational activities. This left faculty and administrators vulnerable because they were exempt from this law. A female teacher, Bernice Sandler, took action to get Title IX into effect because of some her experiences.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960’s, the meaning of 14th amendment rights have changed and evolved overtime in to what they have become today. First, the issue of race played a key role in defining the role of the 14th amendment in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Second, the Supreme Court used a different interpretation of the 14th amendment to decide rights of privacy in the case of Roe v. Wade that concerned the issue of abortion and rights of women. Lastly, the case of Lawrence v. Texas in 2003 that involves the issues of sexuality and privacy, shows another way that the 14th amendment was interpreted to give everyone the right to free choice. Through examining the way that the 14 amendment was used in each of these cases, it is evident that the meaning and interpretation of this amendment has changed overtime.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Title VII of 1964 Civil Rights Act According to The American Association of University Women, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 safeguards individuals against employment discrimination on the grounds of race and color, as well as national origin, sex, and religion. Title VII pertains to employers with fifteen or more employees, including state and local governments. It additionally pertains to employment organizations and to labor establishments, as well as to the federal government. (The American Association of University Women, 2016)…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Employment discrimination occurs when an employee or a group of employees are treated unfairly as compared to others because of their race, age, sex, religion, etc. Employment discrimination usually effects those who are considered the minority. From the statistics of The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), in the fiscal…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964 Racial segregation was an unfortunate part of the U.S history. Before the mid 1960’s, people were not only discriminated against by their skin color, but also segregated from the rest in public facilities, education and employment. In 1964 however, The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was enacted. This legislation outlawed any discrimination based in skin color, gender, religion, and sex in the workplace as well as in public places.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discrimination on the other hand is if you were filling a job opening and offered a woman less money than a man, simply because of gender, sex, or age. Let’s look at some current examples of racial disparity related to criminal justice. First one type of disparity happens when there is a huge difference between the percentage of a racial group represented in general and the percentage of the same group represented at any point in the justice process. African Americans make up only about 12% of the United States population but this group accounts for about 40% of arrests, 50% of the…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays