Descartes Plato And The Matrix Comparison Essay

Superior Essays
Descartes, Plato, and The Matrix: A Comparison
The Matrix, The Republic, and Meditations on First Philosophy all provide some valuable food for thought on the issues of reality and what we think we know to be true. Through their similarities and differences, we can explore some interesting perspectives on the age-old questions of “what can we know for sure if anything?” and “how do we know what we know?” As they have been, these questions will likely continue to be debated and explored for thousands of years to come.
After studying the short readings, I see similarities from all three that all stem from doubt. I personally feel that doubt is one of Satan’s strategic plans against God’s people. Nothing can conflict a persons spirit as much as doubt. In the Christians sense of spirituality, the enemy tries to throw causes and reasons to doubt God. Satan’s whole purpose is to make us question God’s Word and His goodness. Plato presents his analogy of the cave, in which inhabitants of the cave only know the limited reality with which they are presented to be true. They do not experience anything more than a small piece of the full world and, therefore, have a limited knowledge of truth and reality. The condition of life for people in The Matrix is the same. Although they do not know it, all of the people living in the Matrix are experiencing only a reality that is presented to their minds, while their physical bodies sit in vats of fluid plugged into the Matrix. They do not even bother to question whether or not their world is real because they accept what they know and what they see as their truth. Undoubtedly, we can prove through biblical teachings that the world we are experiencing is real. We can find the ultimate source of truth in the Word of God. John 1:1-4 says, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men.” We are all under the control of God
…show more content…
I believe I can handle the harshness of reality because through Christ, anything is possible. The “harshness” of reality is simply the opposite of a “fantasy” world/reality. Of course everyone would want to believe that living is free and easy, but that doesn’t make it true. Too many people enjoy living in ignorance. Hosea 4:6 says, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge” The Bible also says in Proverbs 14:12 “There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death.” Like our examples showed us, we cannot always rely on our own senses. Sometimes what we perceive is different than what the eyes of someone else has perceived. The only time we should be uncertain of our beliefs is if we cannot prove it or support it. However, our beliefs should never be uncertain because they are supported by the everlasting Word of God. Hebrews 4:12 says, “For the word of God is alive and powerful. It is sharper than the sharpest two-edged sword, cutting between soul and spirit, between joint and marrow. It exposes our innermost thoughts and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Dekanawida versus Edwards Authors from the same period often write their stories a lot alike, but there is always some differences. Hundreds of years ago the writing stile was was very different from today, but back then it was normal to write what we now see as weird. The documents "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”, and "The Iroquois Constitution” are perfect examples, but while being similar they are still different. How are these two documents alike? Both Documents use a great amount similes and metaphors in their texts.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the two texts that we read in class, Plato, Phaedo, and Lucretius, Nature of Things, both Socrates and Lucretius try to reassure us that we should not be afraid of death. In Plato, Phaedo, Phaedo is telling the story of Socrates’s final hours from being their first hand. In Lucretius, Nature of Things, Lucretius’s telling his view on religious issues and how he got to his view, poetic skills, and study on scientific phenomena. Both Socrates and Lucretius have different arguments on why we should not be afraid of death. Socrates and Lucretius would have their own responses to each other 's argument if they were to reply to each other.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kallipolis Vs Plato Essay

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What should society be like? This is a difficult question that many have attempted to answer, but rarely does anyone answer as comprehensively as Plato in his Socratic dialogue The Republic, or Marx in The Communist Manifesto. Kallipolis and a communist society are not dissimilar, but both are far from the capitalist America that exists today. Both cities solve the problem of inequality, but because of the social changes either system would entail, neither would work in American society.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many philosophers take simple facts to be the truth without evaluating them, simply assuming these things are true because others told them so. Philosophers who question the basic principles that are accepted worldly can be thought of as outcasts, but in reality, it is better to question everything than to assume anything. Two examples of philosophers who did not make these naïve assumptions are Parmenides and Zeno of Elea. They held the belief that motion does not exist, and were ridiculed for such an outlandish stance. Zeno is best known for creating his four paradoxes of motion, but he actually created a number closer to 40 (Mastin).…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Forcing someone into a completely alternative environment with no prior knowledge of the situation is a platform for confusion and sometimes even denial. Plato’s “Allegory of The Cave,” and The Matrix both contain instances of people who have experience with the process of learning entirely new concepts. In the “Allegory of the Cave,” prisoners are exposed to shadows for all of their lives. This lifelong exposure resulted in the belief that the displayed shadows are the actuality. Furthermore, in The Matrix, Neo is apprised that the world he lives in is nonexistent.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is seen by the eyes can be disproven by looking at an optical illusion, such as a glass of water with a straw in it. Before the straw is put into the glass of water, the eyes perceive the straw as a straight object but once placed in the water the straw appears to be bent. Because of the senses being tricked, Descartes claimed that knowledge must come from the brain instead. The biggest reference to a philosophical idea that is represented in The Matrix could be considered Hillary Putnam’s “Brain in a Vat” idea.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Phaedo is perhaps one of the most well-known dialogues written by the ancient Greek philosopher, Plato. This dialogue recounts Socrates’ final hours before his death as told by Phaedo of Elis, one of the philosophers present during that time. Along with him were Crito and two other Pythagorean philosophers, Simmias and Cebes. The main focus of this dialogue is on the subject of immortality and the soul, and whether or not the soul will survive death. Socrates provides four arguments in which he aims to prove that the soul is in fact immortal.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After reading many books from some of greatest philosophers such as Descartes, Plato, Chuang Tzu, Thich Nhat Hanh, Wachowski Brothers the director of the Matrix and so forth, my mind is wondering with one big question that has been always rotating above my head during my philosophy and film class. That one big question is to define real, how do we define real? Is it merely real that we want to know about? How about the meaning of a true real? How do we know that we are really being in this world, sitting and reading my essay?…

    • 2462 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is not wrong to question or doubt gospel doctrine. Without doubt, church members would be less motivated to finding the truth. Questions lead to building testimonies. Some may think that questioning or doubting doctrines given by prophets is a sign that someone is falling away or lacks faith. However, people ask questions to gain knowledge and build faith.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil Vs Dualism

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The View Between Two The discussion within this paper provide both similarities and differences between myself and an individual who is more educated and familiar with the Bible and its meaning. The discussion involves fitted work from the classroom, the problem of evil. The decision for choosing this subject was based on readings and responses that support the problem of evil throughout the world.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Matrix: Final There is an assurance that at one point in life, the end will come for each individual and everybody will perish at one point. For now, as humans and living things, we are all doing what we do best, exist. However, imagine if the life one believes to be a part of was not actual and in fact, it was all just a virtual concept in the mind. Having had watched the film, The Matrix, this paper analyzes comparisons between appearance and reality to the writings of Bertrand Russell’s, Problems of Philosophy. Thenceforward, René Descartes’, Meditations on First Philosophy are examined and the Method of Doubt is conveyed, carefully analyzing each of its stages.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If Christ played with doubt, so must we. If Christ spent an anguished night in prayer, if He burst out from the Cross, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" then surely we are also permitted doubt. But we must move on. To choose doubt as a philosophy of life is akin to choosing immobility as a means of transportation.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believes that the mind and body are separate because people are a rational thinking thing. One needs to think to exist that was the first certainty Descartes came too. Thinking is what makes us exist and the body is simply an extension to that. The body is unnecessary to exist since a person can exist without a leg or an arm but you cannot deceive existence from thinking. Descartes uses the example of the triangle and in class we modified this to say one can imagine a pink triangle since what makes a triangle a triangle doesn’t depend on the color but you can’t imagine a triangle without three sides because that is what makes it what it is.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates and Rene Descartes are alike in their most fundamental motives but yet contrasting in results both trying to improve thinking but about two different things. One example would be how they each convey their message formal versus informal, another would be their life style and beliefs of how things should be done. Both Socrates and Descartes have completely different views on getting their desired results, and the level of risk one is willing to take to accomplish certain results. Socrates and Descartes even had vastly different upbringing, and views on which sciences are important and others’ inferior to the rest.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays