Descartes 'Meditations On First Philosophy'

Improved Essays
In Meditations on First Philosophy/Meditation 1 Descartes insists that we might not have any surety in our knowledge. He concludes that reality as we know it is false, and we are ultimately deceived. This is interesting because there is no way to prove we can determine whether this is true or false logic. The claim has no intent on changing our daily actions, our moral beliefs, or our role in the universe, but is intended to bring us into open-mindedness. If we allow ourselves to accept the plausibility of our true being in reality, then we surely have the mindset that is driven toward enlightenment. Without this mindset we are stuck in our ignorant ways, conforming to societies comfortable and lazy methods on the search for truth. Descartes …show more content…
It’s as simple as that. No the magician did not change the penny into a dove. Descartes writes about how all he knows of reality is what his senses tell him is reality “All that I have, up to this moment, accepted as possessed of the highest truth and certainty, I received either from or through the senses.”. If our senses can easily be fooled by magic, then how much more are we deceived in our perceptions of reality? To be entirely certain in our senses we would have to reject the premise of deception. This is problematic because we know we our senses are often times wrong. Therefore we should determine the degree of deception we live …show more content…
Some say College Mathematics is the only class you can get a one hundred percent in because you deal with absolute true statements. If I were to evaluate the half of eight, the result would be four. Is this an undeniably true statement? Descartes does not believe so. He says “Let us suppose, then, that we are dreaming, and that all these particulars—namely, the opening of the eyes…are merely illusions” and “Arithmetic, Geometry, and the other sciences of the same class… and scarcely inquire whether or not these are really existent, contain somewhat that is certain and indubitable: for whether I am awake or dreaming”. What he means by saying this is just like we could dream about mathematics, and to dream is to create a false reality, we may consider sciences like mathematics to be false. This concept depends on if we are living in one big dream. A dream we are placed in by a deity. We don’t consider our awaken state to be false, but we do however consider our dreams to be false. That’s because we only know our awaken state to be the highest degree of reality. Descartes considers we are not in a true reality because God created us, and created what we view as reality. He says “the belief that there is a
God who is all powerful, and who created me, such as I am, has, for a long time, obtained steady possession of my mind.”. So what kind of God did this to us, and why is it important to evaluate

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will provide an analysis for one of the celebrated arguments by Descartes written in the Meditations. The challenging argument presented by Descartes is the argument from ignorance, which is precisely claimed in his First Meditation. Moreover, the skeptical argument requires for one to know that the present external world is not a dream in order to have knowledge that an external world exists. Otherwise, one does not really know that an external world exists. As noted, this argument of logical possibility presents difficulties when attempting to provide a satisfactory answer to avoid the questioning of the entailment of what one knows.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dream Argument Descartes

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages

    She also believes that when one knows something, one must also know its consequences because lack of that knowledge would create uncertainty ( Wolgast, 23 ). The relationship between the “knowledge about the world” and knowing that we are dreaming can fit into…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the mind's senses cannot be trusted to discern between dreams and reality, then, there is little reason to believe that it is capable of confirming the reality of existence. Descartes argues that the simple fact that the mind is currently thinking proves its existence when he utters "I am thinking, therefore I exist" (Descartes). This mind is currently conducting its thoughts based on the stimuli it is experiencing. In the “brain in a jar” theory, the mind experiences electrical impulses that stimulate thought. These impulses are not unlike the senses Descartes explains are experienced by the mind while both awake and dreaming.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There has always been a point in history of Western philosophy when the definition of knowledge had been redefined, debated upon, and rejected. However, many philosophers were more concerned with the essence of knowledge, that is, what does constitute as knowledge and how we can achieve it. In addition, many argue that there are certain knowledge is just not attainable and human mind wouldn’t be able to grasp on the capacity of the higher truths. Nevertheless, one still can question the knowledge they already possess and decided for themselves whether to believe it or not. In this essay I aim to demonstrate Descartes’ arguments for skepticism and genuine knowledge.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes “Evil Deceiver” argument he argues that an evil demon is the source of our deception rather than an omnipotent God. The strongest argument that Descartes presents is the idea that our senses cannot be trusted as the world around us and everything we experience is a constructed illusion. In this paper, I will argue that this argument can be seen as sound as our senses can not be trusted because they are unreliable. In “Meditation I: What Can be Called Into Doubt” Descartes explains to us that the information we are receiving through our senses isn’t inherently accurate.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believed that all we can know is information that we are certain of. Knowledge with any amount of skepticism, according to Descartes, proves to be unreliable and thus, not real knowledge. Therefore, he further stated that the knowledge obtained through the senses is not real knowledge because the senses can be deceiving and biased to individuals. Descartes even is skeptical of concepts such as math because he believed that one is just told that two plus three is five, but one cannot be certain. According to Descartes, an "evil genius of the utmost power and cunning has employed all his energies in order to deceive me."…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes’ statement, “I at least know for certain that nothing is certain” perfectly illustrates the multiple problems that arise when all rational beings realize that their senses can deceive them and that the very foundation of their knowledge is based on the assumption that everything they encounter is real. Thankfully, being aware of the problem is the first step in solving it. The juxtaposition of Rene Descartes and William Shakespeare reveals a difference of opinion when they set out to examine and solve the problems that arise from the doubtfulness of the knowledge provided by our senses. Although both authors agree on the importance of solitude and the potential problem of an evil genius manipulating our senses, Descartes’ use…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I do not believe that he means these statements literally. In the third meditation, Descartes talks about the idea of God. After reading this one can come to the conclusion that Descartes does believe there is a God out there even though his religion is not clear. Off of that premise, I came to the conclusion that Descartes does not truly believe we are in a simulation, dream, or are even being tempted by an evil demon. These ideas are not supposed to be taken literally.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes Deceit

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many year has past when Rene Descartes realize that everything he had thought was to be true wasn’t, It turn out that everything he had worked on was a lie as well. Rene Descartes realize what he now what he has to do, he has to start all over from the ground up. Rene Descartes say’s “reason tells me that as well as withholding assent from propositions that are obviously false, I should also withhold it from ones that are not completely certain and indubitable. So all I need, for the purpose of rejecting all my opinions, is to find in each of them at least some reason for doubt.” (Descartes)…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes states that because of this we must break down everything we know and find a base to our knowledge, an unquestionable principal. He continues on to say that because of this we should not trust anything that has previously deceived us and consider what we hold to be true by this. Descartes says that there are many ways that our senses that provide impressions, as Hume would put it, will deceive us. For example, because man has the ability to dream while a sleep, how is that we know we are awake this very second. The same goes for our sight; from far away we may think there is water in the distance on a very hot day but as we get closer we realize that our visual sense have mislead us.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes, especially in his First Meditation, condemns the ability of sensation to provide information about the natural world and humans’ surroundings. Although he believes that humans must trust their senses to understand the obvious, he believes that not all perceptions can be trusted as bodily senses can be deceptive to internal understanding. However, a problem arises: how can one contemplate everything that is perceived around them as false? Certainly, unknown truths must reside in experiences not yet encountered especially those that require interactions with distant places and unfamiliar ideas. Descartes argues that these unfamiliarities are produced by pure introspection, but it can be argued that communication with a superior being allows humans to fully understand their supposed innate ideas.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes associates as an Early Modern Thinker as he obtains opposing views from the Medieval Period. Descartes believes that the Medieval Period thinkers suffer corruption because of their theocentric views and negligence regarding advancing knowledge, as the medieval thinkers practice exegesis. Descartes concludes that an intellectual revolution is necessary in order to completely break with the corrupt past in order to gain new knowledge and truths. In order to achieve new truths and most certain knowledge, Descartes yearns for indubitably, the inability to doubt claims.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays