Foucault's Theory Of Utilitarianism

Foucault argues that there is a critical shift in terms of power associations that is evident in the circumstance where the soul replaces the body as an objective of penal suppression. This form of displacement presents a fresh form of exposing the body to influence informed by information. Thus, the body is no longer considered as an object of punishment but rather as a tool for retribution. If the body is enslaved, the objective is not to impose bodily harm but rather to withdraw persons of their privileges. In addition, Foucault posits that despite the fact that changes involve the objective of correction, arbitrariness and extremes of the monarchical punitivestructure, the real aim, far from being altruistic, involve the creation of a …show more content…
In the theory of justice as fairness, the principle of equal rights for all citizens has the greatest importance over the aim of creating the greatest aggregate of contentment for the largest number of people. However, in utilitarian theory the objective of generating the greatest amount of happiness for the largest number of individuals has more significanceoverriding the principle of equivalentprivileges for all individuals within the society.Rawls posits that justice as fairness does not indicate that justice and fairness are indistinguishable, but rather the ideologies of justice are contracted to under reasonablecircumstances by individuals experiencing a situation of fairness. In addition, 'Justice as fairness ' also involves that the principles of justice made in application toequality to all individuals. Therefore these principles should be decided upon in such that it benefitsall individuals, and must notsimplyplanned for theconsentof the welfares of a specificset of individuals over another group of individuals. Rawls argues that, the two main principles of justice should be agreed throughsensible and shared disinterested individuals: every individual should possess an equivalent right to as much freedom as is harmonious with the rights of others; and any social or economic disparities that occur between individuals should …show more content…
While the values of human accomplishments in the arts and sciences are to be valued, the theory of justice as fairness refutes that individuals should obtain a greater or lesser share of basic fundamental privileges and responsibilities as a result of their personal successes or due to their individualinfluences to society. Rawls advocates that the principles of justice may be satisfied by a constitutional egalitarianism. Nevertheless, a commonly experienceddeficiency of constitutional democracy is the fact that it may permit a greater inequality in the circulation of affluence and assets than is harmonious with impartiality of economic, social, and political prospects for every individual. In addition, another flaw of constitutional democracy is that it may tolerate political influence to accrue within the selected group or party who may engage the institutions of government to attain greater benefits. In conclusion, Rawls argues that for the purpose of altering the defects, it is essential for political equivalence of prospects to be guaranteed by the