The Declaration did not indicate how the general will should be defined. The constitution that was developed by the National Assembly, however, assumed that the general will was expressed by the representative the people in the National Assembly, which is a republican concept of representative government. In contrast, the many groups representing the people of France did not accept the authority of the National Assembly and accepted the premise in Article 6 that every individual has the right to participate personally in …show more content…
Consequently, the declaration had meaning separate from the constitution that described the way the constitutional monarchy would operate. The Declaration gained symbolic significance in French politics at the time (Neely, 2008, p. 86). The people of France looked to the Declaration as a rationale for taking overt action against a government that was not responsive to the will of the people. A particular conflict arose between the principles in the Declaration and the type of government formed by the constitution. The Declaration called for all citizens to take part in the making of laws. The constitution, however, divided the population into active and passive citizens with only active citizens having a vote (Rude, 1988, p. 62). To become an active citizen and obtain the vote for the preliminary selection of delegates to the National Assembly, the individual had to be a male, pay a direct tax, and not be engaged in service. Only those citizens who paid a large amount in tax could make the final selection of the delegates. Because of this system, only the wealthiest individuals representing only 10% of the population had a vote that resulted in meaningful control over the members of the National Assembly (Rude, 1988, p.