“... I looked in Leah’s eyes… I kept trying to speak… I sighed and this made her frown… I hit the gate so it opened and ran off and left Leah just standing there…” (Haig 151-152). Philips’ behavior isn’t what one would expect in a book based around revenge. He keeps failing to act, not giving the audience the action they assume will take place to avenge the murder. He has his doubts about what he’s doing, as shown by the numerous occassions that he didn’t pull through. He can’t bring himself to just blindly trust in his father’s ghost, not knowing if his dad is reliable; especially after the minibus incident when he told him the wrong night the pub would get broken into. Is his father’s ghost actually trustworthy? Or is he just misleading Philip? How can Philip know for sure? The Dead Father’s Club shows that life is built around uncertainties, thus why Philip cannot act appropriately in the situation he is
“... I looked in Leah’s eyes… I kept trying to speak… I sighed and this made her frown… I hit the gate so it opened and ran off and left Leah just standing there…” (Haig 151-152). Philips’ behavior isn’t what one would expect in a book based around revenge. He keeps failing to act, not giving the audience the action they assume will take place to avenge the murder. He has his doubts about what he’s doing, as shown by the numerous occassions that he didn’t pull through. He can’t bring himself to just blindly trust in his father’s ghost, not knowing if his dad is reliable; especially after the minibus incident when he told him the wrong night the pub would get broken into. Is his father’s ghost actually trustworthy? Or is he just misleading Philip? How can Philip know for sure? The Dead Father’s Club shows that life is built around uncertainties, thus why Philip cannot act appropriately in the situation he is