David Rousseau Research Paper

Improved Essays
I agree that Rousseau defends the morality of the men against the science and arts. He argue that the advancement of science had not been a beneficial to the world and to the mankind. Yes it creates new ideas and opportunity but the knowledge's progress resulted to powerful government and had the ability to crushed someone's liberty and freedom. As Jasmine said that science actually cover the cruelty inside us, because we don't even noticed it we forget that we are not free. The more people live exposed to society the more people don't see how the nature or the second character change to them, it become an ambiguity in which you don't see if you are a slaved of the complexity and power of the present day society.

Human beings is basically

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Robert De La Salle By Alynna Medina My French explorer is Robert de la salle. Robert’s whole name is Rene Robert Cavelier Ssieur de la Ssalle. L,la salle was born in Rouen, France on November 22, 1643.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "Nature means them to think, to will, to love cultivate their minds as well as their persons; she [Nature] puts these weapons in their hands to make up for their lack of strength and to enable them to direct the strength of men. They should learn many things, but only such things as suitable." Rousseau was not only remarkable because he believed that a child's education should be focused on his/her interests, but also because he believed that women need to learn more than simply domestic…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On a superficial level, the root of the problem is the drive to compete and the drive to compare oneself to others. A political solution for this “compare and compete” problem can be theorized. The first potential solution that comes to mind is to find a way to equal the playing field until there becomes no need for comparison with others because we are all equal, and through this equality brings the end of competition, for what is achievable by one, is achievable by all. One way to accomplish this would be for the political power (i.e. the government) at hand to invent a means that impeded on any one individual’s advantage in society, whether it be intelligence, beauty, creativity, etc.. In Kurt Vonnegut’s short story, “Harrison Bergeron”,…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau argues that in nature, “a savage man’s body is the only instrument he knows, he employs it for a variety of purposes that, for lack of practice, ours are incapable of serving.” Rousseau immediately shows how society and civilization have decreased the nature of man because modern advancements have kept man from following natural physical improvements necessary for survival. Rousseau then explains how extreme inequality in our lifestyle exists when you look at distribution of labor and resources in society such as the excessive idleness among some, the excessive labor among others, the overly refined foods for the wealthy, and the lack of food for the poor. Humans are neither monogamous nor romantic and Rousseau states that “it is incontestable love itself, like all other passions, had acquired only in society that impetuous ardor which so often makes it lethal to men.” Finally, Rousseau asserts that society and civilization have removed mankind from its natural habitat with the introduction of language and abstract thought, both of which would not exist in…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau was an English Philosopher whose work was influential especially in the eighteenth century. Some of his main works include the Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, and the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Both of these works were written in response to prompts from the Academy of Dijon. For the first discourse, the prompt was, “Has the restoration of the sciences and arts tended to purify morals?” and for the second discourse the prompt was, "What is the origin of inequality among men, and is it authorized by the natural law?"…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henri Paul Research Paper

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On August 31, 1997, Princess Diana of Wales died when her driver, Henri Paul, crashed the car in the Pont de l’Alma road tunnel in Paris, France. Many people think that the death of Princess Diana was purely an accident, and it wasn’t planned. People failed to notice, however, that Henri Paul was keeping connections with the SAS, which is a special forces unit that branched away from the British army. By rethinking their approach to her death being an accident, people can fix others who think the same, and focus their minds on how Henri Paul was truly responsible. Henri Paul intentionally crashed the car, killing Princess Diana for three reasons; he was driving the car recklessly, he was drunk while driving, and he was keeping connections with the SAS.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This publication was more accomplishing than the First Discourse; its content was what made Rousseau fall into the category of an Enlightenment thinker. The start of Rousseau developing his theories of “human social development and moral psychology”(Stanford Encyclopedia) can be seen. Rousseau discusses about two types of inequality: moral and natural (or physical). In the first half of the Discourse of Inequality, “The natural man is well balanced by his two trends, pity (which pushes it to the other) and self-preservation (which isolates). In marital status, laws and virtues play the roles of these two instincts” (Tim).…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper I am going to summarize Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” in which Rousseau theorizes that inequality is not a natural event, but an unfortunate byproduct of modern life. I will then provide a criticism of Rousseau’s argument, focusing on his decision to not discuss the relationship between natural and moral inequality. This criticism will then be countered by a theorized response from Rousseau’s perspective. The general argument presented by Rousseau is that the establishment of civil society and the associated progress of humanity is the underlying cause for the inequality between men.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of his best known quotes states that, “Man is born free, and he is everywhere in chains” (The Social Contract). In his Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts, Rousseau answers the question “Has the restoration of the sciences and the arts contributed to the purification of mores or to their corruption?” (Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts). He goes on to argue that the pursuit of science desensitized people to their natural, good state, and instead caused them to become slaves to meaningless burdens. Rousseau believed man was born inherently good, but by being introduced into society and the sciences, people become greedy and prideful.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau believes that humans are born innocent but are later corrupted by society. “Although, in this state, he deprives himself of some advantages which he got from nature, he gains in return others so great” (Rousseau). Rousseau believes that men are born equal but through the influence of society men “deprives himself of some advantages” that they are born with. Rousseau uses the words such as “advantages” to inform the reader about the features that mankind is born with but society removes it. The tone Rousseau uses is pro mankind but only to an extent.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For men he recommends that they explore and think on a large scale and for women he recommends that they think and live through the men in their lives and that they are to think domestically; to be educated to run a household, raise their children and obey their husbands. He claims that these differences in education are caused solely by the individuals ' "nature". Rousseau takes the view that certain traits are only biologically determined and hints that they may be social, but never elaborates on it. To understand this concept more fully though we need to delve into what Rousseau initially meant by sex because the definition has changed over time where sex now seems to only refer to the biology and gender is used to refer more to the psychological…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    François Viète Life François Viète was born on 1540 in Fontenay-le-Comte, Poitou (which is now Vendée), France. His grandfather was a merchant from La Rochelle; and his father, Etienne Viète, was an attorney in Fontenay-le-Comte plus a notary in Le Busseaun. As for his mother, Marguerite Dupont, is the daughter of Françoise Brison. His life growing up there was no complication since he was able to attend school with education opportunities which lead to where is now being famous for being a mathematician. He went to a cloister school, studied law in 1558 at the University of Poitiers, and graduating with a Bachelor of Laws degree in 1559-60, but for four years later abandoned it to enter the service of Antoinette d’Aubeterre, mother of Catherine of Parthenay, supervising…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau criticizes the state of nature described by Hobbes; instead of a constant state of fear, Rousseau described it as equality and happiness. Through the passage of time, the state of nature started to disappear as small communities formed, here man started to make comparisons to one another as class divisions developed. For Rousseau private property was a drastic change because communities went away from a simple state to one that consisted of greed and rivalry. Disapproving of Hobbes, who argued that people surrendered rights to an overall “ruler”, Rousseau believed people surrendered their rights to each other, in other words the community. For Rousseau, modern civilization took away the good parts of the early societies and replaced it with a society revolved around the state.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michelangelo's Pieta Essay

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages

    People create art for many different reasons. It can be to reflect on their worldview, their place in time. To record historical data. Or to create what it is they were seeing around them. It was often used to express ideas, and expand on current ones.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    inequality issues. We are so wrapped up in our own lives that we “think about human society with calm and disinterested eyes” but if we look closely, its easy to see “only the violence of powerful men and the oppression of the weak” (Rousseau, 10). Is what is happening today with police brutality but a window into our systemic oppression and violence against those who have the least power to do anything about it? Our duty as “revolted mind[s]” at seeing such a truth is that we must “deplore the blindness of the others” and work toward making the world an equal and thus free place for all (Rousseau, 10). In the end, Rousseau says, “ since nothing is less stable among men than these external relationships, which chance produces more often than wisdom and which are called weakness or power, wealth or poverty, human institutions appear at first glance to be founded on piles of shifting sand,” which illustrates the nature of this dillema perfecctly.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays