In Document E it says “Ancient Japanese made purchases using quantities of rice rather than money”,(Document E).Then in Document G it states “Traders began to use Cowrie shells as a form on money,”(Document G).As you can see in Document E it says that Ancient Japanese used quantities of rice rather than money.Then is Document G it shows that traders used Cowrie shells as money.These two both connect because since they don’t have any money they would barter.They are also connected because they have to do with currency and how it was a form on money.This proves my assertion because trading was different around the world because they traded money differently and currency was different
In Document E it says “Ancient Japanese made purchases using quantities of rice rather than money”,(Document E).Then in Document G it states “Traders began to use Cowrie shells as a form on money,”(Document G).As you can see in Document E it says that Ancient Japanese used quantities of rice rather than money.Then is Document G it shows that traders used Cowrie shells as money.These two both connect because since they don’t have any money they would barter.They are also connected because they have to do with currency and how it was a form on money.This proves my assertion because trading was different around the world because they traded money differently and currency was different