Crito Socrates Moral Analysis

Decent Essays
public he would not have continued his life's work of philosophizing but instead he would have stopped and would have let himself fall victim to what the city of Athens had to say. Knowing his life would be lived well if he continued doing the work that he loved, Socrates chose to listen to himself over listening to the public, thus making his life worth living. Raising the question of whether it would be of good action to escape from prison with Crito, Socrates speaks of why he feels as though running away would ruin his moral character and relationship with the laws. Stating the seriousness of his relationship with the law, Socrates compares the law to a mother with a child. Like a mother the law protects, cares for and only wants the best …show more content…
For Socrates to now act out of desperation and fear for his life, he would be going against what he has known since birth, which is to be true to himself and to who he is. With a strong character portrayed as a religious man, Socrates does what God has told him to do. He continues to philosophize throughout his life in order to fulfill his duty to God even if that means giving up the opportunity to live. Morally speaking, Socrates would not only be letting down the law that has been in his life since birth, but he would be disappointing himself by going against his ways. Standing up for what you have believed in all of your life is exactly what Socrates does when he speaks in court and when he speaks to Crito. Knowing that his life is on the line, Socrates chooses to stick to his morals and principles. When Crito talks to Socrates he brings up the point that Socrates has been done wrong by his people and by the law which he claims to have done him good, but Socrates quickly refutes this by saying that he does not hold anyone else for guilty because he chooses to look at the reasoning behind such things instead of trying to get back and make them worse. Crito believes that Socrates should escape because he has been put to death for a crime that he has not committed, but Socrates knows that fighting evil with evil would go against everything he

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Since the Laws exist as one element, to break one would be to break every one of them, and in doing as such, Socrates would bring about them incredible damage. The citizen is bound to the Laws like a child is bound to a guardian, thus to conflict with the Laws would resemble striking a guardian. As opposed to just infringing upon the Laws and departure, Socrates ought to attempt to induce the Laws to release him. These Laws introduce the national's obligation to them as a sort of social contract. By living in Athens, a resident is bound by supporting the Laws, and complying with them.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s *Crito*, Socrates is in his prison cell awaiting his execution. He is then visited by his friend Crito who has planned an escape to get Socrates…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main theme of the book of Crito is about whether should Socrates break the law and escape from execution or stay and accept his death penalty. At the very end, Socrates pointed out that trying to escape breaks the law, and any act that breaks the law is unjust . Therefore, Socrates refused to escape and decided to accept his death penalty and execution. Socrates responded each of the three arguments Crito brought out. However, are Socrates’ arguments reasonable and is it always right to obey the law regarding the law itself is morally justice or injustice?…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These series of questions culminate into Socrates’ conception of virtue leading him to reject Crito’s pleas for him to escapes because if he does he will be disobeying the laws of the state. By disobeying the law of the state he would be committing an injustice and doing what is wrong therefore harming his soul. If he harmed his soul, then he would not be living the virtuous or examined life which he states in the Apology “is not worth living”; so even if he disagrees with the state he must still obey its laws since that is, in his perception of virtue, just and right. This dialogue gives more understanding as to why Socrates questions the views and actions of others and gives practice to Plato’s teachings from Euthyphro and…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In allowing himself to be executed, Socrates would be allowing his unfair trial to be validated. He also plays to his duties as a father, stating that “if [he] go[s] off when [he] could be educating them… they’ll meet the same fate which usually befalls orphans once they’ve lost their parents” (Cahn 507). He tries to convince Socrates that he is choosing the easier path, and not finishing the education of his…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following essay will discuss Socrates reasons for refusing Crito’s offer of help in Crito, as well as whether or not these refusals are justified. We will discuss each of Socrates reasons for refusing in turn, criticising each as we move through the dialogue. Crito raises the problem of the extent to which a moral person is obligated to their City State (referred to as Athens and the State throughout), as well as the individual's dedication to the central principle of the dialogue; never doing any wrong. We will focus on the idea that by being wronged by the State, Socrates’ obligation is dissolved but his reasons remain justified due to his dedication to the avoidance of wrongdoing and Plato's need to have Socrates be a consistent character and this being the sole justification for his refusal. Socrates gives four reasons as to why he refuses Crito’s offer of escape.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's The Crito Argument

    • 1769 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the opening dialogue of the Crito, we find Socrates in a prison prior to his execution. Socrates awakens to find his old friend Crito sitting outside his cell “I have been marveling at you, when I see how peaceful you’ve been sleeping” (43b). Crito has come to convince and persuade Socrates to escape his his sentence of execution “I think that if you die it won’t just be one misfortune”(44c). Yet Socrates presents many arguments and lays out the principals that he has chosen to live his life by.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We argued that that the imprisonment of an innocent man has already undermined the Laws of Athens and so his escape would be just, in reversing the damage to the state. However, Socrates believes that one should ever wrong someone else, and he believes that his escape would undermine the Laws of Athens, and so under this justification, Socrates is justified in not escaping. We considered the idea that perhaps for Socrates his not escaping is not about political obligation but is instead a matter of maintaining his character, and if this is his true justification then he is justified in his…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    (p. 20). This statement is a clue as to what Socrates personal beliefs are on acting just and with piety. With his words, he shows the court that although he does not agree with the charges, he will act as the law has been written for all of the citizens of Athens. He does not expect special treatment and his acceptance of his fate through “God wills” is that of a pious nature. The “God wills” line is sort of a slap in the face to those accusing him because, for Socrates to put his fate in Gods’ hands, it goes against the very nature of the accusations of his atheist behavior.…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With his reasoning and arguments, Socrates decides to not obey the Laws of the state and proceeds with his verdict. Socrates knows that he did not truly commit a crime or disobey with the laws, but he did not want to commit an unjust action as well. Although one may not agree with the ideas and beliefs of a state, that…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also accepts his fate stating that, “it is not difficult, O Athenians! to escape death… it is much more difficult to avoid depravity.” All of his life Socrates taught philosophy and forward thinking, and if he had gone back and begged for a fine or for jail he would’ve thrown away everything he had taught to his students and everything his life had supposedly stood for which is to be moral just and virtuous. Socrates goes on to say that the judges should punish his sons and pain them as he had pained them if they were to exhibit signs of depravity by holding things like money before virtue.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Plato’s Apology, Socrates is put on trial for accusations of disruptive behavior. Some men in the community feel that his way of life goes against the will of the Gods and corrupts the youth. As he stands before a jury that will ultimately decide his fate, Socrates states that “the difficulty… is not in avoiding death, but in avoiding the unrighteousness” (Plato 38). Socrates knows that death is inevitable, and repeatedly claims he does not fear it. He believes that it is harder to run from the injustices and evils of the world than it is from death, so he defends his philosophy even after execution becomes the verdict.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps Socrates realized the courts were right in his sentence because he was not truly wise and had in fact corrupted the minds of the youth. Or, maybe he knew that if he was to be acquitted of the charges he would continue his teachings and probably end up back in jail, and would rather not waste the time and effort. Or, maybe Socrates’ love of Athens and the respect he had for the government and the courts decision stopped him from fleeing his death…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A man of principle, Socrates stood by his word even when facing death. However, this prideful unyielding arrogance led to his downfall. Though today we regard him as a progressive, his shocking contrarian…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates continues to explain how he can’t violate the verdict, which in this case is the death penalty therefore, it would be wrong because Socrates couldn’t go against his principles. Socrates states, “ Come then, if we destroy that which becomes better by the healthful and is corrupted by the distasteful, because we don’t obey the opinion of the experts, is life worth living for us when it has been corrupted? Surely this is the body, isn’t it?”(47e) Socrates is explaining how in his mind life is not worth living unless it is lived appropriately in this case being, that the ethical life is more important than life itself. Socrates continues his justification on why he can’t escape prison because by committing this action he would be doing what he considers as the unjust thing because he would’ve been seen as a dishonorable…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays