Crito Justice And Allegiance To The City-State Analysis

Improved Essays
Crito, Justice, and Allegiance to the City-State

Plato’s Crito takes place inside of Socrates’ jail cell after his conviction of corrupting the youth. Socrates was unjustly given the death sentence and will be forced to drink hemlock, a deadly poison, in two days. Socrates discusses, with his wealthy friend Crito, whether it is just or unjust to escape from jail and consequently, break the law. It is important to remember that Socrates is believed to be innocent by Crito and Himself because if Socrates was guilty than it would be obviously unjust to escape. Crito attempts to convince Socrates to escape jail and gives him a dozen reasons why he must escape; however, Socrates gives counters for reasons why he cannot escape with specific focus
…show more content…
The first reason is weekend because it means Socrates cares about what the common people think of him. Even though he tells Crito “In that case, good sir, we should not at all take into account here what most people will say about us,” (Crito, Stephanus page 48a). However later in the dialogue, Socrates states, “[They] will look at you with suspicion as a destroyer of laws” (Crito, 53 b). Socrates almost invalidates this argument completely through his constant contradiction. The next reason is the most important to him in that it complies with his ideology the most. According to Socrates, when a boy reaches the age of manhood he must decide whether he wants to leave the state in which he grew up in. To leave the state means he finds the laws of that state fundamentally unjust and he must go elsewhere to find a state with more just laws. Socrates chose to live in Athens and in turn chose to follow the laws of Athens, not just the laws he found to be just, but all of the laws. Personally, Socrates last argument is the strongest that if one can decide which laws to follow and which to break the entire state collapses. One must either accept all of the laws and legal systems of a state or they must find a state where one agrees with all

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Since the Laws exist as one element, to break one would be to break every one of them, and in doing as such, Socrates would bring about them incredible damage. The citizen is bound to the Laws like a child is bound to a guardian, thus to conflict with the Laws would resemble striking a guardian. As opposed to just infringing upon the Laws and departure, Socrates ought to attempt to induce the Laws to release him. These Laws introduce the national's obligation to them as a sort of social contract. By living in Athens, a resident is bound by supporting the Laws, and complying with them.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main theme of the book of Crito is about whether should Socrates break the law and escape from execution or stay and accept his death penalty. At the very end, Socrates pointed out that trying to escape breaks the law, and any act that breaks the law is unjust . Therefore, Socrates refused to escape and decided to accept his death penalty and execution. Socrates responded each of the three arguments Crito brought out. However, are Socrates’ arguments reasonable and is it always right to obey the law regarding the law itself is morally justice or injustice?…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These series of questions culminate into Socrates’ conception of virtue leading him to reject Crito’s pleas for him to escapes because if he does he will be disobeying the laws of the state. By disobeying the law of the state he would be committing an injustice and doing what is wrong therefore harming his soul. If he harmed his soul, then he would not be living the virtuous or examined life which he states in the Apology “is not worth living”; so even if he disagrees with the state he must still obey its laws since that is, in his perception of virtue, just and right. This dialogue gives more understanding as to why Socrates questions the views and actions of others and gives practice to Plato’s teachings from Euthyphro and…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He knows if he refuses to escape prison that he will have a good defense when he stands before the dead who will see him as a victim of injustice not from the law but injustice from those who abused the law. Crito and Socrates flow of the arguments goes Living Well Argument- to do an unjust action ruin one's soul, Life is not worth living with a ruined soul, and hence the most important thing is not life but living a moral and just life. Consequences for Athens Argument- if I escape from jail, then the laws of Athens and thus the city of Athens will be destroyed. To destroy the laws of Athens and the city of Athens harms the citizens of Athens.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trying to break someone out of jail is not the most legal way of doing it, but Crito just wanted to save his friend. As a citizen, Crito should have done nothing because the most legit way would be letting the court decide if Socrates is innocent or guilty. Martin Luther King and Crito have the same views of doing what is right even if it involved breaking some rules; King wanted to bring awareness to the whole country about racial segregation against African Americans by breaking laws that were unjust and for Crito he wanted to save his best friend from being executed by breaking him…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is also faced with a decision to follow the unjust law in escaping jail or the just law in remaining and facing death. Conflicted, Socrates explores the meaning of just and unjust laws. King explores similar terrains in asking the question, "How can you advocate breaking the laws and obeying others? " In the end, Socrates convinces Crito that it would be best to remain in jail and not attempt an escape.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When both them not being able to come up with a proper answer, it can be seen leaving the jail cell is not the right thing to do. The struggle with not being able to come up with an answer mostly stems because they know they are not in the position to justify what is right and wrong. I believe that Socrates knows this deep down and is which is why he decides to not leave the jail cell. In the face of adversity, it, even when he is not in the wrong, it is important for Socrates to stay and fight for what he truly…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Crito Argument

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Crito” is a dialogue written by Plato during 360 B.C.E. In the beginning of the dialogue, Socrates is in prison waiting to be executed. He is visited by his friend, Crito, which tries to convince Socrates to escape the prison. Crito and his friends had made arrangements so that Socrates can escape, but Socrates is unwilling to do so as he wants to go through his execution. Crito presents to him many arguments to try to persuade him to escape.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following essay will discuss Socrates reasons for refusing Crito’s offer of help in Crito, as well as whether or not these refusals are justified. We will discuss each of Socrates reasons for refusing in turn, criticising each as we move through the dialogue. Crito raises the problem of the extent to which a moral person is obligated to their City State (referred to as Athens and the State throughout), as well as the individual's dedication to the central principle of the dialogue; never doing any wrong. We will focus on the idea that by being wronged by the State, Socrates’ obligation is dissolved but his reasons remain justified due to his dedication to the avoidance of wrongdoing and Plato's need to have Socrates be a consistent character and this being the sole justification for his refusal. Socrates gives four reasons as to why he refuses Crito’s offer of escape.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's The Crito Argument

    • 1769 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the opening dialogue of the Crito, we find Socrates in a prison prior to his execution. Socrates awakens to find his old friend Crito sitting outside his cell “I have been marveling at you, when I see how peaceful you’ve been sleeping” (43b). Crito has come to convince and persuade Socrates to escape his his sentence of execution “I think that if you die it won’t just be one misfortune”(44c). Yet Socrates presents many arguments and lays out the principals that he has chosen to live his life by.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We argued that that the imprisonment of an innocent man has already undermined the Laws of Athens and so his escape would be just, in reversing the damage to the state. However, Socrates believes that one should ever wrong someone else, and he believes that his escape would undermine the Laws of Athens, and so under this justification, Socrates is justified in not escaping. We considered the idea that perhaps for Socrates his not escaping is not about political obligation but is instead a matter of maintaining his character, and if this is his true justification then he is justified in his…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crito Argumentative Essay

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He believed they were a major part of human interaction. He believed, “you should always keep you agreements, provided they are right and just.” Socrates also believed that as a citizen of Athens, “he had an agreement with Athens to comply with the law.” Finally he believed that, “the agreement holds, even though he was treated unjustly.” These beliefs led Socrates to comply with the law, and accept the punishment he was given.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With his reasoning and arguments, Socrates decides to not obey the Laws of the state and proceeds with his verdict. Socrates knows that he did not truly commit a crime or disobey with the laws, but he did not want to commit an unjust action as well. Although one may not agree with the ideas and beliefs of a state, that…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Crito, Plato illustrates Socrates in a complete contrast to the image that the reader captured in The Apology. In the dialogue between Crito and Socrates, Crito tries to convince Socrates that escaping out of jail is the right the thing to do. Crito first argues by explaining that it would be wrong for Socrates to throw his life away in prison because if he decides to remain in prison then he will be doing exactly what his enemies intended to do. Crito continues his argument by explaining that if he were to remain in jail he will be silenced, thus, Socrates would be conspiring with other people who are trying to do something unethical. Crito continues by brining forth Socrates’ children and how they would be affected and would be left without a father, however, Socrates isn’t convinced by Crito’s…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays