Credibility Of Brutus's Speech In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

Improved Essays
There are a numerous amount of unforgettable rhetorical speeches throughout time. Brutus and Anthony speak about Caesar’s death in rhetorical monologue in the Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Brutus’s speech initially persuades the Plebeians, but Anthony’s speech appears more attractive; therefore, causing chaos and ultimately causing Civil War throughout the Roman Empire.
Brutus demonstrates credibility, emotion, and persuasion in his rhetorical monologue. Brute did a tremendous job of applying credibility in his rhetorical monologue. He builds credibility by, “Roman, countrymen, and lovers… Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less” (3.2, 14, 19-20). He also builds credibility based on talking at the same level as the plebeians and he wants to build a connection with the crowd by saying he loves Caesar. He says that he loves Caesar just so the plebeian can relate to him. Emotion plays a major part of Brutus’s rhetorical monologue. Brutus assembles emotion by, “If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (3.2, 20-22). He shows his emotion to the crown, which is overwhelmed with sadness due to the fact that he murders his friend, but has to do it to save his nation (Rome). His rhetorical monologue tries to persuade the Plebeians. The honorable man tries to demonstrate persuasion by, “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?”(3.2, 23-24). This statement puts a picture in the plebeians mind about how life would be like if Caesar lives. One major flaw occurs when Brutus let Anthony speak next. In Anthony’s rhetorical speech, he displays integrity, cajolery, and sentiment.
…show more content…
Anthony exhibits integrity throughout the novel. He does that by presenting negative thoughts about Brutus, but saying multiple times, “Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2, 88). Anthony is talking negative thoughts and says positive statements about Brutus, just to make Brutus and the Conspirators have a bad name for their actions. Sentiment plays a major part of Anthony’s monologue. Anthony shows it by saying, “Bear with me: My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, And I must pause till it come back to me” (3.2, 106-108). Anthony portrays his sentiment as sorrowful due to the fact that he lost the rest of the body parts, since he was Caesar’s right hand man. Anthony will seek revenge for what Brutus did to his loyal Caesar. Anthony persuades the crowd that the Conspirators made a major mistake. He persuades the crowd by, “Kind souls, what weep you when you but behold Our Caesar’s vesture wounded? Look you here, Here is himself, marred as you see with traitors” (3.2, 196-198). Anthony is trying to explain that Caesar’s wounds are from the Conspirators (traitors) and there should be revenge on Caesar’s massive murder. After Anthony’s speech, the Plebeians take Anthony’s monologue to heart and they kill Cinna the Poet. These are the impacts of Brutus letting Anthony speak in Caesar’s funeral. Both of the paragraphs relate to the scope of the play. Brutus appears very noble, but he is known for his major flaws throughout the novel. Before Caesar’s death, Cassius told Brutus that Anthony should die, but Brutus says Anthony has no power. Another flaw is letting Anthony speak, which leads to a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He was able to appeal to the audience by saying things that would pull on their emotions. For example, Brutus states, "Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” This asks the Roman people if they rather have Caesar be here for them all to be slaves, or have him gone so when they all die they would be free men and women? If Caesar were to stay alive, the Roman people would eventually be slaves because Caesar would be the ruler of Rome. He also stated, “Who is here so vile that will not love his country?”…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus’ speech creates an understanding from the plebeians of the moral obligation of Caesar’s death. After hearing Antony’s speech the romans experiences a lot of anger and decide to burn down the houses of all the conspirators and kill them. “We will be revenged” (III.3.198). The anger inside of the plebeians proves to create irrational thoughts which results in them killing an innocent man who just happens to have the same name as one of the conspirators. In addition to that they also go to destroy the conspirators’ houses.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He stresses this point all throughout the speech. In the first half of his speech he bluntly says,”Not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more. Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?”” In saying this, he makes sure the people know that he did love Caesar, yet the wellbeing of Rome was more important to him. Brutus also brings a seemingly harsh reality onto the audience, almost appearing to be trying to evoke a thankful attitude from the people.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This battle of words takes place during Caesar’s funeral, where both Anthony and Brutus speak in a bid to win over the large crowds of plebeians. There is a major difference between the two character’s and how they address the crowds. Brutus speaks first and reasoning with the crowd using logic; Brutus uses superlatives to argue his case more persuasively: “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” (3.2.20) Through juxtaposing Caesar and Rome, Brutus hopes to simplify his argument against Caesar in order for the plebeians to understand more clearly. This is reinstated by the fact that Shakespeare had Brutus speak in prose which was the style of speech used by the common man.…

    • 2437 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Initially, Antony presents a tone of sincerity and relative agreement with the conspirators: “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him” (). However, as his oration progresses, so too does the tone toward a more dramatic categorization. While Antony prepares to read Caesar’s will to the Roman citizens, he indicates the specific wounds inflicted by Cassius and Brutus: “Look, in this place ran Cassius’ dagger through... Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed” (). As a plebeian shouts, “O traitors, villains!”…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Then he declares how when Brutus stabbed Caesar, it was not the knife that ended Caesar 's life. It was Brutus 's betrayal. Antony throws caution to the wind, going as far as to call Brutus a dishonourable traitor. What he does is deflate the conspirators as he fills Caesar up. To illustrate how much the people had depended on Caesar, Antony says, "Great Caeasr fell.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He convinces the crowd that Caesar was great. The crowd would feel guilty about trusting Brutus, after Antony persuaded them he was almost pathetic, this makes the crowd angry and they rebel. Antony also says "Here was Caesar! When comes such another?" which makes the citizens feel guilty and like they'll never get another Caesar, so they have missed there chance to let Caesar…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony states his direct purpose and asks for his audience’s attention outright, thus creating mutual respect through ethos by addressing his peers as equals. In addition, Antony appeals to the crowd’s emotions by mentioning Caesar’s will and how every citizen lies within in lines 132 and 133 of scene 2 in Act III. This employment of pathos riles up the audience and influences them to join his side, yet it also creates a leash with which Antony ties to the crowd to fulfill his agenda. Continuing, Antony leaves nothing to chance or opinion by focusing on the fact that he has no business in disproving Brutus’ words, but only to speak what he knows (III. ii. 100-101). Antony manipulates ethos in this instance to protect his integrity by addressing that his goal does not lie within feuding with another.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus asks the Romans if they would rather be enslaved with Caesar living, or free with Caesar dead. In this case the citizens have their thoughts led astray by this rhetorical question which is focused on the positive outcome of Caesars death, away from the actual brutality and ruthlessness of the murder. Furthermore Brutus’ use of parallelism “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him /As he was fortunate, I rejoice at it/ As he was valiant, I honor him/ But as he was ambitious, I slew him” serves the purpose of directing the plebeians thoughts towards the fact that Caesars death was justified and that his reasoning behind the mutiny was that he loved Rome more than he loved Caesar.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical play, “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare illustrates the problems of leadership that commence after the assassination of the Roman dictator, Julius Caesar. The play has a thorough use of rhetorical devices and was a powerful persuasion tool during the whole of the show. This literary device is extensively used during the funeral scene in Act three, Scene two where Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches about Caesar's death. In their funeral speeches, while Marcus Brutus delivered a logical speech, Mark Antony overall wins the crowd through his use of ethics and empathy. Antony’s speech left such a lasting impact due his skillful use of Pathos.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without Caesar’s sudden popularity, he would not be in power. Because he manipulates and captures the attention of all Romans, they are attracted to him. Cassius explains this to Brutus as he tries to convince Brutus to join the conspiracy, telling him, “I was born free as Caesar. So were you. /…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine living in an empire where your leader was assassinated by his close friend. What would you do? In Rome’s case, the death of Julius Caesar brought fear and chaos. Many Romans anxiously demanded reasons for Caesars death from two people, Brutus, who planned and carried out the assassination of Caesar and a close friend of Caesar, and Mark Antony, who was a high ranking official and also a close friend of Caesar. Both Brutus and Mark Antony had different views on the death of Julius Caesar and they hoped their orations would persuade the audience of Rome to agree with their point of view.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Which makes it seem like the people in the crowd are participating and forming their own opinions, when Brutus is really forming their thoughts for them knowing that everyone is going to give the same answer. During Mark Antony’s speech he uses the same technique, using repetition and rhetorical questions to prove that Caesar was not ambitious. He states, “He hath brought many captives home to rome,/ Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill./ Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? . . . You all did see that on Lupercal/ I thrice presented him a kingly crown,/ which he did thrice refuse.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays