Costco Wholesale Corp. V. Omega S. A. Summary

Decent Essays
Court Synopsis: Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega S.A.
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega S.A. case was heard by Chief Justice Roberts at 10:02 a.m. by the supreme court on November 18th 2010. Omega manufactures luxury watches in Switzer land, which it distributes around the world. One of Omega’s high-end watches, the Seamaster, sometimes bears an engraving of the Omega Globe Design. Omega obtained a copyright for the Omega Globe in March 2003. In this particular case, Omega is suing Costco over 43 Seamaster brand watches that Costco bought overseas and sold in the U.S., claiming the retailer had infringed a copyrighted “globe” design that appeared on them.
During the hearings it appears as if Omega was going to win the case. The ninth circuit

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo I. Introduction a. I picked the Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo case as my topic for my research paper. In this paper I will focus on the fundamental changes during the beginning to end of the case. I will also analyze the important facts that plaintiff and defendant used to testify during the trial. b, Peg Bouaphakeo and several former and current employees of Tyson Foods, Inc. sued the company's meat processing facilities in Storm Lake, Iowa.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my court case Witherwax v Transcare, Inc. 2005 NY. Transcare ambulance transported Witherwax to the hospital 2000, and the transcare employee didn’t recorded the right address for Witherwax resulting in Witherwax not receiving a bill for the services performed by transcare. Transcare sent witherwax bill to a collection agency. Witherwax claims that Paul Michael reported the debt to the three credit reporting agencies as being "seriously past due. Witherwax tried to resolve the debt, but learned that the invoice had been sent to an incorrect address: 30 West 61st Street, New York City, 10023, Apt.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The critical implications of the decision of Haque & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1765 (2 July 2015) in terms of the binding nature of opinions of Medical Officers of the Commonwealth (“MOC”) appointed by the Minister, are as it is stated in regulation 2.25A of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) the (“Regulations”). In that the opinion of the MOC is to be taken as to be correct in determining whether a person meets the requirements of Public Interest Criteria (“PIC”) 4005. The delegate of the Minister is not to form their own opinion on whether or not an applicant meets the requirements of PIC 4005.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study: Option #1 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island Breana L. Gray MG260 Business Law Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island Parties The Plaintiff and Appellee are 44 Liquormart, Inc. since they have brought a case against the state of Rhode Island and are the respondent in a case to a higher court. The opposing party is thus described as the Defendant and Appellant, being the state of Rhode Island. Facts A Rhode Island law banned the advertisement of the price of alcoholic beverages in all forms, except in the form of tags or signs that were only located inside the actual liquor store.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also the there was no statue saying the sentences should be reserved concurrently and that it is not a decision for this court to make and should be redirected to another court. Overall, I agree with the final decision in affirming the courts…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, they submitted their case to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Syllabus: A statute in the state Kansas make it a misdemeanor for any person participating in “debt adjusting”, with an exception to the practice of law. This statute does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause since states have the power to enact what they consider injurious practices in commercial and business affairs. The statute is valid as long as the laws do not conflict with specific constitutional rulings and federal law. Procedural History: This case was filed by Skrupa doing business as “Credit Advisors” alleged that Skrupa engaged in “debt adjusting”. A three judge court heard evidence from Skrupa alleging the usefulness and desirability of the business as well as evidence by the state alleging that “debt advising” leads to grave abuses against distressed debtors, particularly in lower income brackets.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    PAYING COLLEGIATE STUDENT ATHLETES 5 football and men’s basketball players would leave college early to play professionally. As Senator Chambers later noted in his speech, many collegiate athletes come from low income backgrounds and athletics is their way out. One of the biggest reasons student athletes leave for the NBA or NFL before their eligibility expires is because they will be paid. By providing them with financial assistance, even if it is set aside in a trust fund, it may make a difference for student athletes who are on the fence about ending their education early. Issues with the NCAA also arise when considering that in 2013, the NCAA’s management and general spending grew by 9% while the distribution to Division 1 members only…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The advanced pricing technique that would be most appropriate for a Sam’s Club or Costco would be second degree price discrimination. Second degree price discrimination is defined by Thomas and Maurice (2010, p. 583) as, “When a firm offers lower prices for larger quantities and lets buyers self-select the price they pay by choosing how much to buy.” Therefore, when the same consumer buys more than one unit of a good or service at a time the marginal value placed on consuming additional units declines as more units are consumed (Thomas & Maurice 2010). In addition, second degree price discrimination reduces the average price as the amount purchased increases.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Griswold's arguments were totally against Connecticut. He proved Connecticut that the law which he proposed was totally against the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states, "no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...nor deny any person the equal protection of the laws,". His arguments mainly focused on that married couples have the right and freedom to do whatever they like to do. There can be no one as hindrance to stop them from doing what they want to.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Legal scholars assert that the damage to a trademark due to dilution is far more severe than the damage to a trademark due to confusion. For example, the Coca-Cola Company would suffer less economic damage from having an occasional consumer, who wants a can of Coke, mistakenly purchase a can of Pepsi, than having the consumer associate Coke with cocaine. U.S. case law surrounding dilution further establishes than dilution damages a trademark. In Cola-Cola v Gemini Rising, Inc., a poster manufacturer was selling posters that had the phrase ‘Enjoy Cocaine’ written across them. This slogan was written in the same stylized script and in the same colours as that of a registered Coca-Cola trademark, Enjoy Coca-Cola.…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Costco Wholesale Corporation is an object for a variety of government regulations that are impacting the company’s business activities. As for a retail business, the recent increase of the regulation requires Costco Wholesale Corp. to follow them in order to avoid fines or restrictions. One of the recent laws, Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act signed in February 2016, puts a strict regulation on the import of goods in the U.S. that are produced with the help of the forced labor thus eliminating the hole in the old Tariff Act. Previously, it was possible to import such goods if domestic production was not able to fully cover the demand. Also, the act requires all the corporations to conduct annual reports that provide the information about the company’s efforts to address the human rights risks in their supply chain.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Walmart is Trying to Sell Liquor in Texas Pretty soon, you may be able to run by your local Walmart and pick up everything you need for a great drink. That's because Walmart is currently in the process of taking the state of Texas to court over their liquor laws. However, while being able to pick up liquor at Walmart may seem convenient, not everyone is happy about the idea.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Barclays fails to win dismissal of NY 'dark pool' lawsuit is an article that I thought was interesting when it comes to business and law. It talks with reference to the two different sides and what they are trying to accomplish when it comes to the aspects of dark pools in stock markets. Stempel describes dark pools as a way of discretely trade shares, without all the investors being informed. Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is bringing up a lawsuit against Barclays. Barclays is a bank that is enthusiastic on the subject of people going to them and making them their bank.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issues are whether there is an exception regarding to the majority rule and proper plaintiff rule in Foss v Harbottle? In the cases of Foss v Harbottle provides two types of rule which is “majority rule” and “proper plaintiff rule”. “Majority rule” is the majority shareholder decisions and choices over the minority shareholders. The majority votes from the shareholder within the company are ¾ of voting rights which is 75 %.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays