Congressional Representatives Should Not Have Term Limits Essay

Superior Essays
The debate on whether congressional representatives should or should not have term limits is still a big issue in the realm of the United States’ political system. This issue has been debated for many years, but is constantly overlooked by congressional representatives from across the country. Having congressional term limits would be extremely beneficial to the political system of the United States, and to the citizens of the United States. Some of the founding fathers were also in favor of creating term limits for representatives. The purpose of this paper is to prove that it would be beneficial for members of Congress to have term limits because it promotes new ideas, prevents corruption, and would have a positive impact on the legislation …show more content…
Advocates of term limits knew that this would be an almost impossible task since members of Congress would not want to pass a law that would shorten their own careers. Eventually, it was found that the individual states had the right to limit the terms of their own politicians. Since states had the right to choose whether politicians would be subject to term limits, it was decided that some states would put it on the ballot during the next election. Colorado was the first state to put the issue on the ballot in the 1990 election. The measure overwhelmingly passed, which made it an enormous victory for term limit advocates. After the first state had successfully passed legislation limiting the terms of congressional representatives, other states began to consider it. Soon after Colorado passed the legislation limiting the terms of congressional representatives, other states, such as California and Oklahoma, decided that the people would vote on the same issue for limiting the terms of state legislatures. Term limits became popular in both the Democratic and Republican parties. Opponents of term limits tried to appeal to the public through the media to rally support against term limits, but for most of the early 1990s, polls showed that about 70 percent of people were in favor of limiting terms of …show more content…
Currently, there are fifteen states across the United States that have laws limiting the terms of legislatures. The most common type of term limit is on state legislatures where both state representatives and state senators can serve a maximum of eight years. There are multiple states with this law throughout the country. The states that have this law are “Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Maine, Missouri, Montana, Ohio and South Dakota.” Not only do some state legislatures have term limits on its members, but also the majority of states in the United States have term limits on the governor of that state. Currently, thirty-seven states throughout the country have term limits on the governor. The majority of those thirty-seven states only allow the governor to serve two four-year terms. The term limits in these states has helped keep fresh ideas and ideologies moving through the state’s political system, and has also kept keep the elections in these states

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A 28th Amendment Congressional adoptions of amendments to the Constitution come few and far between, although prove effective in bettering the welfare of the United States. The Law of the Land must change alongside America’s changing views. The next necessary amendment to the constitution should be a set outline for term limits for both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Currently, term limits do not exist among Congress, leading to possible corruption and political scheming, allowing the same state representative to stay in office until he/she resigns or passes away.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of those seats up for reelection is the seat for Colorado, currently held by democrat Michael Bennet. Michal Bennet and his drive for reelection are particularly interesting…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Larry Sabato, an American political scientist who graduated from the University of Oxford, recommends a new constitutional convention to revise the current United States constitution to change all three branches of government. The proposals Sabato is offering do not do any good, as this paper proves later. Constitutional amendments can be great in cases like the 14th or 21st, but these proposals would not do anything like that . Sabato’s opinion on how to revise the judicial branch by increasing the number of Supreme Court justices from nine to twelve and adding a Balanced Budget amendment to prevent any deficit spending are good ideas in theory, but in reality, neither would work.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Senators originally were elected by state legislatures to six-year terms to maintain their accountability to their states and to buffer them against constant political pressures faced by House members. Ratified in 1913 as a reform, the 17th Amendment reassigned the Senate election process from legislators to citizens at large. While I respect the admirable efforts of Americans of a century ago to expand the reach of democracy, the 17th Amendment unintentionally broke the link between senators and their state government that their offices were designed to…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each house, however, clashes with one another, making for a broken Congress. In Hamilton and Madison’s On Congress (1788), in order to be in the House of Representatives, one “must be of the age of twenty-five years; must have been seven years a citizen of the United States; must, at the time of his election, be an inhabitant of the State he is to represent” (page 180). If these guidelines are met and one is elected as a representative, two year terms are served; however, there are no limitations to how many terms one may serve. Because of the young age and less time spent per…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I chose the following 3 states to review: California, Pennsylvania and New Jersey California: Selection Process: The governor appoints nominees to the Supreme Court and courts of appeals to 12-year terms. These judges are subject to retention elections for additional 12-year terms. Superior Court Judges are elected in nonpartisan elections for 6-year terms and may be reflected to additional 6-year terms. Qualifications:…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay #2: The Texas Governor and the President Over the years, it has been said that Texas has a very weak governor compared to other states. It has also been said that some people believe that the governor should have more power and that they should be a state 's equivalent to the nation’s president. Here, we will first analyze the differences and similarities between the Texas governor’s power versus the power of the United States president.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How California’s Government Differs from the Federal Government Each state has its own government that govern the people living in that particular state. The State’s government makes ballot initiatives etc. to help the maintain a democracy in the state. The Federal government, on the other hand, makes laws, treaties etc.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no term limit for a governor, however, the president can only be elected for two four-year terms. Presidents are elected through the electoral college and governors are elected by a popular vote. The President can appoint his own cabinet members, but in Texas, most department heads are elected rather than appointed. Another difference is in the second in command to both of these offices. The president is able to choose a running mate, or his vice president.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a well functioning republic, voters elect officials whose ideals align with their own. To allow politicians with a vested interest in the way districts are drawn create congressional districts is inherently illogical, and, as the court cases in Wisconsin and our state have shown, politicians of both parties will act on this vested interest. Disproportionate representation is a result of gerrymandering when redistricting is placed in the hands of state legislatures, but it is not the only result. Packing districts also decreases political competition. The consequence of the lack of competition is increasing polarity in office.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Benefits of Congressional Term Limits According to Lydia Saad three in four Americans would vote for Congress members to have limits on the amount of terms they can serve. noteDespite the information previously stated citizens of the United States have still neglected to put the concept of Congressional term limits at the federal level into effect, perhaps they have not yet realized the specific benefits that limits on terms in Congress would have on American politics. The issue of Congressional term limits is not rearing its head for the first time. In the 1990’s several states passed legislation to limit the terms of their state Congressmen.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One issue that has been at the forefront of debate for a number years in the United States is whether members of congress should have set term limits. I am advocating that members of congress ought to have term limits set forth limiting the amount of time they can serve. One reason I am urging this action is because I feel a large number of congress members have served for so long that they are no longer working toward representing the voices of the people, but rather working for their own self-seeking desires. Though twenty-two states have enforced some type of term limits, I feel as though it should be a matter of national law enforced in all fifty states. I am also advocating this position because incumbents continue to dominate, not allowing for new individuals who may not have as much funding to participate within the race, but do indeed have superb ideology.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Members of the House already have to be re-elected every two years and members of the Senate have to be elected six years. (“How Congress Works”, 67) Therefore, it is unfair that a constituents vote must be casted on a candidate who falls between the eligible amount of terms. If a candidate gets re-elected therefore it is what the constituents want. This argument against the implementation of term limits in congress is flawed in many ways.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For one, the required age is 25 years old. This person must also be an US citizen and a resident of the state he or she would represent. House members serve two-year terms and there no term limits, however, there is reelection every 2 years. The number of house members is based on the population to the state. Therefore, states such as California or New York would have more than one representative due to its population.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If life tenure is such a good idea, as it would eliminate the above mentioned problems, then why are so many in opposition of term limits and shuns the proposals? They value judicial independence, and they all have forms of accountability and term limits, so what are the reasons for their views and objections about cutting life tenure? Making term limits would not make the stakes any less important or productive.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays