Phenomenology and Existentialism September 28, 2017
Mark Joseph R. Cabahug
Philosophy.
Phenomenology and Marxism
‘Some treatises on Socio – Marxism ‘
Harper and Collins, New York 1987, P. 1 – 205. ISBN 978955783224
the main purpose of this book when it was written probably, after of the so called Cold War during the time that there is still a Soviet Union or the infamous USSR. Then a sizable chunk of Marxist state under several famous leaders like Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev, and the last Gorbachev, and their different socio – political approach that leads to both a philosophical even phenomenological existential exploration on the impact of so called Marxist philosophy and economic strategy …show more content…
Dall Mayr while explaining on the phenomenological aspect of the idea of Marx’s, ended up on just quoting the economics of socialist agenda rather on the title of “Dasein from the classless society” which we see as conflict – laden idea. Why well on the end of his rhetoric’s regarding classes of society the ended – up of comparing Russia on its past from fiefdom to Communism nothing changes but everyone became a collectivist citizen which we know that is against the principle of “Dasein” since the Being become one and uniformed in a collectivist society, this we know whisk us from being true to our individual being which we need to be processed in our internal …show more content…
in total. Well this book speaks about the fundamentals of communism and the value of its philosophy which well again somewhat contradicted itself by the authors insistent to the basis of for Marx not ever worked out a philosophical system. He secondhanded other people’s theories in a new way. An obvious predecessor was Hegel, whose philosophy rested on three assertions: All organic processes are in fact dialectical, Reality is organic in virtue must have a basis of Idea.
Yet we know that socialistic ideas of Marx’s were not even dialectic much more of reactant collectivist and sure his hermeneutical structures again contradicted itself. Marx accepted probably or did not accept and rejected. Orthodox communism of MacMurray’s (the author in comparison) did receive under the account of its philosophy in a dialectical materialism. It is a logical principle. An organic process is never ‘wholly A’ or ‘wholly not-A’. It is a process of development. It is not a state of ‘being’ but ‘becoming’. It cannot be adequately handled by traditional logic based on the law of contradiction. Rather it is a metaphysical principle which could be used to construe reality as a complete entity. Though, it is not necessarily implied by the logical attitude. The attitude which Marx did stream was a sociological principle – the assertion that the processes
Mark Joseph R. Cabahug
Philosophy.
Phenomenology and Marxism
‘Some treatises on Socio – Marxism ‘
Harper and Collins, New York 1987, P. 1 – 205. ISBN 978955783224
the main purpose of this book when it was written probably, after of the so called Cold War during the time that there is still a Soviet Union or the infamous USSR. Then a sizable chunk of Marxist state under several famous leaders like Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev, and the last Gorbachev, and their different socio – political approach that leads to both a philosophical even phenomenological existential exploration on the impact of so called Marxist philosophy and economic strategy …show more content…
Dall Mayr while explaining on the phenomenological aspect of the idea of Marx’s, ended up on just quoting the economics of socialist agenda rather on the title of “Dasein from the classless society” which we see as conflict – laden idea. Why well on the end of his rhetoric’s regarding classes of society the ended – up of comparing Russia on its past from fiefdom to Communism nothing changes but everyone became a collectivist citizen which we know that is against the principle of “Dasein” since the Being become one and uniformed in a collectivist society, this we know whisk us from being true to our individual being which we need to be processed in our internal …show more content…
in total. Well this book speaks about the fundamentals of communism and the value of its philosophy which well again somewhat contradicted itself by the authors insistent to the basis of for Marx not ever worked out a philosophical system. He secondhanded other people’s theories in a new way. An obvious predecessor was Hegel, whose philosophy rested on three assertions: All organic processes are in fact dialectical, Reality is organic in virtue must have a basis of Idea.
Yet we know that socialistic ideas of Marx’s were not even dialectic much more of reactant collectivist and sure his hermeneutical structures again contradicted itself. Marx accepted probably or did not accept and rejected. Orthodox communism of MacMurray’s (the author in comparison) did receive under the account of its philosophy in a dialectical materialism. It is a logical principle. An organic process is never ‘wholly A’ or ‘wholly not-A’. It is a process of development. It is not a state of ‘being’ but ‘becoming’. It cannot be adequately handled by traditional logic based on the law of contradiction. Rather it is a metaphysical principle which could be used to construe reality as a complete entity. Though, it is not necessarily implied by the logical attitude. The attitude which Marx did stream was a sociological principle – the assertion that the processes