The stories both have devastating results. In OMAM Lennie was the one whose actions resulted in tragic endings. George caused the murder because he decided to shoot Lennie instead of attempting to run away or hide with Lennie. George nervously decides to kill Lennie, “The voices came closer. George raised the gun and listened to the voices,” (Steinbeck, 116). Although Lennie caused the problem, George ended up being the one when ended Lennie’s life. The Narrator describes the moment he left Doodle, “ I ran as fast as I could, leaving him far behind with a wall of rain dividing us,” ( Hurst, 781 ). The Narrator indirectly killed Doodle, and is unsure about what actually happened to Doodle during his death. The narrator leaves Doodle behind in the storm instead of helping him. The reader can assume that due to the Narrator's actions, and the description of the storm, actions Doodle is killed. To conclude, the tragic events were because of the actions of their
The stories both have devastating results. In OMAM Lennie was the one whose actions resulted in tragic endings. George caused the murder because he decided to shoot Lennie instead of attempting to run away or hide with Lennie. George nervously decides to kill Lennie, “The voices came closer. George raised the gun and listened to the voices,” (Steinbeck, 116). Although Lennie caused the problem, George ended up being the one when ended Lennie’s life. The Narrator describes the moment he left Doodle, “ I ran as fast as I could, leaving him far behind with a wall of rain dividing us,” ( Hurst, 781 ). The Narrator indirectly killed Doodle, and is unsure about what actually happened to Doodle during his death. The narrator leaves Doodle behind in the storm instead of helping him. The reader can assume that due to the Narrator's actions, and the description of the storm, actions Doodle is killed. To conclude, the tragic events were because of the actions of their