Julius Caesar Essay In the play William Shakespeare wrote, called Julius Caesar, there is a big difference between two of the characters. The two are almost opposites from each other. One character being, Brutus, a very honorable man, and Antony, a very persuasive man and targets one’s emotional state. Brutus spoke at Caesar’s funeral, he appealed to the people’s logic and Antony spoke to the emotions of the people. Brutus believes that emotions overrule logic. Antony is very bright and full of facts. He uses his brain often throughout the play. Brutus was very honorable because he always told the truth. Antony was persuasive in the way that he used people to get whatever he wanted. For example, Antony says “I speak not to disprove what
…show more content…
Antony proves himself a consummate politician, using gestures and skilled rhetoric to his advantage.Antony proves himself a consummate politician, using gestures and skilled rhetoric to his advantage. Brutus’s speech was all based on opinions, one might not be affected as another. Antony’s speech you had to agree because what he was saying was the obvious truth. Antony’s speech just appealed to feelings, either making you angry, happy, or sad. “You all did love him once, not without cause withholds you then, mourn for him?” Antony targets one’s emotions to persuade.
Brutus is a powerful public figure, but he appears also as a husband, a master to his servants, a dignified military leader, and a loving friend. His argument in his speech was much more reasonable and was backed up with facts. “He hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: ”Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” Is a good example of logic he used from the speech. His speech was much better and well said unlike Antony’s. It is easier to believe someone who has always told the truth.
In conclusion, in William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, there is a major difference between the two characters, Brutus and Mark Antony. The main contrast between the two characters appears to be their ability and inability to be both honorable and persuasive and is able to use ethics and facts and get his point across. However,
Antony proves himself a consummate politician, using gestures and skilled rhetoric to his advantage.Antony proves himself a consummate politician, using gestures and skilled rhetoric to his advantage. Brutus’s speech was all based on opinions, one might not be affected as another. Antony’s speech you had to agree because what he was saying was the obvious truth. Antony’s speech just appealed to feelings, either making you angry, happy, or sad. “You all did love him once, not without cause withholds you then, mourn for him?” Antony targets one’s emotions to persuade.
Brutus is a powerful public figure, but he appears also as a husband, a master to his servants, a dignified military leader, and a loving friend. His argument in his speech was much more reasonable and was backed up with facts. “He hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: ”Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” Is a good example of logic he used from the speech. His speech was much better and well said unlike Antony’s. It is easier to believe someone who has always told the truth.
In conclusion, in William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, there is a major difference between the two characters, Brutus and Mark Antony. The main contrast between the two characters appears to be their ability and inability to be both honorable and persuasive and is able to use ethics and facts and get his point across. However,