Compare And Contrast Han China And Athens

Improved Essays
Ancient civilizations have significantly impacted the world today, mostly during their golden age. Their geography, politics, and achievements have also separated the mediocre civilizations and the great ones. Both the Han Dynasty of Ancient China and Athens, Greece, fell into the latter category. The Han Dynasty lasted from 206 BC and survived until 220 AD and was far more advanced than other civilizations during their time period. After the collapse of the Qin Dynasty, Liu Bang rose to power to escape harsh policies, forced labor, and high taxes. Their more lenient rule lead to more trust established between the government and the people, which lead to greater achievements. On the other hand, Athens only lasted from about 500 BC to 300 AD. …show more content…
The Han Dynasty were incredibly superior in this category. The few major achievements of Athens were that Athens’ archon or leader, Solon, boosted exports in wine and olive oil, bringing in more money and he also created many government reforms. In contrast, Han China was the most advanced empire in the world at their time. They created bridges, rudders for ships and made paper. This shows great imagination and creativity, not to mention, impressive building skills. Regarding medicine, China excelled in diagnostic skills and acupuncture. Diagnostic skills are important because they kept patients from being treated wrongly. Furthermore, Han China had very precise and detailed artwork which shows a significant skill set. Not only did they also have storage bins to keep food from being eaten by animals or becoming rotten, they also had a monopoly on salt and iron, keeping them as a top provider for nearby countries. China, during the Han Empire, was clearly far more advanced concerning …show more content…
Athens was a Democratic Republic whereas Han China was Imperial. The most famous ruler of the Han Dynasty was Wudi. He helped the economy greatly by building roads and canals. He also built storage bins for grains. The Han government was Legalistic but had many Confucius advisors because the official belief system was Confucianism. Scholars ran the bureaucracy. There was even a civil service exam that had to be taken to make sure that people got jobs based on merit, rather than status. They were also used for making sure that Confucian scholars were in an important position. Any man could take these tests, which shows an equitable system in place. The Han expanded the powers of bureaucracy because that was what was deemed necessary to rule over such a large amount of land. The leader or emperor appointed a governor to a section of land they would rule over. The governor would then designate a ruler for a smaller region and so on. There were certain people with certain areas of expertise. This lead to a government made up of almost 130,000 bureaucrats (Document 7). This shows that not only could the Han Dynasty rule over such a large area effectively, they could also employ thousands of people at the same time, all while under one centralized government. This document was written thousands of years after this time period, and published on the other side of the world for a textbook. That shows that the point of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In order for any great civilization to flourish, a time of trials and tribulations needs to exist in order to set a foundation for what is successful and what constitutes failures. At times these learning’s may not always be as prosperous as expected however with time, civilizations grow to prevail as the Qin and Han dynasties showed in imperialist China for more than two millennia. In order to do so, the First Emperor of the Qin Empire, Qin Shi Huang in 221 BC, recognized that in order to have successful civilizations one needed to establish a vast working system such as those of the Greeks and Romans during the classical time period. Although this period did not have the longevity of other dynasties, it did however set the foundation for…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 200 BCE and 200 CE, the two leading empires in the world were China and Rome, due to their widespread and rapidly expanding territories. Both empires expanded significantly throughout the span of their empires. To control such vast areas, Rome and China implemented comparable practices, yet significantly different. The Chinese government was much more centralized and bureaucratic, when being compared to Rome. In governing such extensive territories, bureaucratic and legal considerations overthrew individual necessities.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many defensive actions were taken by both countries to sustain a strong government; Rome formed a strong army and China built a great wall to keep invaders at bay. Also, Han China relied…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. -476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) are likely the two most well known empires of the time period Because of their large size and influence. When describing methods of political control, the two mirrored each other in many ways but, in some respects, had contradicting ideas. The methods of political control used by Imperial Rome and Han China were similar regarding their use of political theologies to justify leadership, their centrally structured government, and their use military power, but exhibited different roles of citizens in government and techniques for maintaining order in the lower class. In Imperial Rome and Han China, the leaders used political theologies to explain and justify their rise to…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    China and Rome both existed during the same time period but were pretty different. The biggest difference between The Han Dynasty (china) and The Roman Empire was there laws/ rules. The Han Dynasty had Confucianism which focused on relationships and after death were Rome had a government law where everything had to be done by the book. Because of Confucianism, Chinas recovery after The Han Dynasty ended was easier then how Rome had it after the fall of the Roman Empire. The most significant similarity they share is their achievement.…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman v. Han Attitudes Toward Technology Both the Han and Roman Empires existed during a period of time in human history referred to as the Classical Era. Both the Han and Roman Empires were very large civilizations that were highly dependent upon agriculture. The Han Dynasty typically utilized technology while the Roman Empire employed significantly more slave labor than the Han Dynasty. Han China government officials exhibited a desire for government control of technology while other Han leaders viewed technology as a gift form enlightened leaders.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The imperial administration of Han China and Imperial Rome both left behind many achievements and had an Emperor as the political leader. However, the Romans weren’t as independent in their technology, nor did the emperors rule the same way. The Han and Roman Emperors left behind an abounding amount of new accomplishments, but it is obvious that the Hans had more creativity in their culture. The Roman Empire was influenced heavily by Greek Culture.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To begin, Ancient Greece and Han China had very distinct differences amongst their political views. For example, document 4 is a speech by Pericles to the Athenians. He spoke in favor of the democracy in Athens to show that they were better than other city-states. The city was governed by the people instead of the government, and Pericles described how laudable the structure was. Even though Pericles was from Athens, which may have caused bias, the speech shows that the first democracy was successful and the Athenians were content.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many similarities and differences in the methods used to control politics between the Han China Empire and the Imperial Rome Empire during the Classical period. Han China started 206 B.C.E. and ended in 220 C.E. and Imperial Rome lasted from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E., and both had advanced social and political systems. Even though both empires had gone through many difficulties and severe changes, Imperial Rome Empire still kept many political and social aspects from the Roman Republic, and Han China from the Qin Dynasty. The Han China empire and Imperial Rome empire had governments that were heavily engaged in economic activity, so they can be able to build a strong social and political order, and to have control over their populations…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout their time of rule both empires were imperial and under the rule of one ruler. The Romans had the Principate that called for one ruler controlling the government even though there was a senate. While the Han had rulers whom were deemed god because of what they had done for their people, and country, making both empires imperially centralized and without both aspects they probably would not have strived, and been as great as they are seen in…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han empire was a Confucianist society and incorporated Confucianism into its everyday ideals. The Han empire created a system of civil service…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Zhou had a decentralized administration; the Qin had its legalist system and central government, and the Han had both bureaucratic administration and central government. Legalism, Confucianism, and Daoism influenced government and societal roles. Legalism used in the Qin and Han dynasties constructed the social hierarchies, so individuals themselves could move up based on merit. Confusion morals in the Han dynasty dictated one should live according to morals. Chinese and Indian governments both had many different governments but only China was unified by…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Classical Athens they had a more self-governed government whereas for Han China the emperor controlled governed everything. In both empire infanticide was not seen bizarre in their societies. Also in both empires the women had roles that were very much alike and were viewed in a similar manner. These two empires had their differences but they weren't great differences that set them apart from each…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the key components of any successful civilization throughout history is political control. It has proven itself absolutely necessary when it comes to maintaining order in any society. Political organization began to become much more elaborate during the Classical period, offering government leaders more control over the population. We see many different approaches to maintaining this control throughout the classical period civilizations. The Classical period Han and Mauryan dynasty sought and achieved political control through both religion and social hierarchy.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Second Rome gave women a right to be citizen also new born babies , but they had limited rules. Lastly Roman Senate was way more calm and mature and organized the Athenian Assembly was super rude, noisy and unorganized they was so busy talking among them self that they couldn't hear the announcer couldn't even say why they're even there because it so loud. This is my opinion why Rome is way better Athens. (Doc A, B, ,D, E and F…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays