Cindy Sherman's Negative Self Image

Register to read the introduction… Teenagers are introduced into the glossy magazine culture where images have been taken with expensive equipment and photo-manipulated images to sell a product. Our visual perception and interpretations underpin a process within a conceptual approach forcing us to visually see a representation and reaffirming our sense of identity and the realism of the photographic image laid before us because of this it is easy to see why long term lasting effects ripple though individuals lives, creating a negative self-image. We will look at aspects of Cindy Sherman`s images and explore her reason as to why she completed a series of self-portrait in the way she did and examine the relevance to what she was intending to show. The fact that she decided to not manipulate images could suggest she wanted to portray and uncover the differences between attractive and unattractive.
We will look at the works of Nick Knight whom with “a long-standing commitment to experimenting with the latest technologies led to Knight launching his fashion website SHOWstudio in 2000, with an aim, in Knight's own words, of 'showing the entire creative process from conception to completion.” We will also look at the works of Annie Leibovitz who has captured beautiful celebrities over the …show more content…
Those that are critical of how photo manipulation is used we will be presented with a look at the negative responses that have been triggered by celebrities and viewers which has led to celebrities refusing to have their photos retouched and decided to “take a stand against rampant photo retouching, declaring the practice detrimental to your health which has brought attention to photo manipulation such in the case of Brad Pitt and Kate Winslet who asked photographer Chuck Close to capture them showing all imperfections, we are then left with questioning are they really make up free? In order to do this we must look at both sides of photo manipulation and the effects that it has on the viewer followed by echoing the idea that a photograph points to both the reality and a dream before finally deciding what we see as Art in photography and distinguishing what really exists and what existed enabling us to explore the relationship between photography and the truth.
Becky Olstad is a photography instructor at The Art Institutes International Minnesota says “there is a general misconception that Photoshop inherently means manipulation” This is the reason why it is important to discuss the meaning of what photo manipulation actually can do other than promote a disconnected reality, it allows us to control such things like exposure, colour balance, contrast, lighting, all the things that have traditionally been controlled in a traditional