Oyinkansola Lapite January 28th 2016 MFC 483 Case Title and Citation: United States of America v.Juan Manuel Contento-Pachon, 723 F.2d 691 Relevant Case Facts: The defendant Juan Manuel Pachon received a job offered from one of his passenger named Jorge to be a driver of a privately own car. Pachon expressed an interest in the job and decided to meet both Jorge and the owner of the car. The next day Jorge proposed that Pachon swallowed cocaine and transport to the United States, and that if he mentioned the proposition to anyone he would get in trouble. A week later Pachon told Jorge he would not be transporting the drugs. Jorge replied to Pachon by mentioned important and personal…
UNITED STATES v. SALERNO, 481 U.S. 739 (1987) History: Anthony “Fat Tony” Salerno, a supposed member of the La Cosa Nostra crime family, was detained by the federal courts before the actual trial due to the 1984 Bail Reform Act. The federal court system believed that Salerno was not only a part of a prominent crime family in New York, but that he was potentially dangerous to the community. Facts: Salerno was indicted for several different charges due to the Racketeering, Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act also known as “RICO”. This also included other allegations of mail fraud, wire fraud, extortion, and multiple gambling violations.…
Some people were innocent and others were guilty.. It unfair that the innocent people died since it’s not under their control that they…
At the heart of Mark Danner's graphic and eye-opening historical novel, The Massacre at El Mozote, is an ideological battle between communism and capitalism. By backing the right-wing El Salvadoran government and military, the United States became an active and willing participant in one of the bloodiest single massacres in Central American history. The massacres at El Mozote, La Joya, La Guacamaya and Arambala killed nearly 1,000 peasants. The group most responsible for these atrocities was the feared Atlacatl Battalion, trained and funded by the U.S government. The government found themselves in what appeared to be an increasingly vulnerable position in this region during the Cold War.…
The movie Mosquita y Marí, is a great representation of what it's like living in an urban community and their everyday lifestyle. We are introduced to the two main characters Mosquita and Marí, we see differences between the two, between their lifestyles, and personalities. After meeting each other they created a bond like no other. Therefore, the girls go through obstacles that the only they both can understand which were the roles as young Latina females, Mosquita trying to find her own identity drowned in her parent's dreams, and the two questioning their own sexualities. While identifying the popular culture in the film.…
In the late 18th and early 19th century many colonies in South America began wars against Spain in an effort to gain their independence. Eventually all of Latin America gained independence from Spain. Two key leaders in the liberation movements were Simon Bolivar and Jose de San Martin. After the creation of Republics Latin American politicians looked to the United States for support and guidance. Two such influential men were Domingo Sarmiento, President of Argentina, and Matias Romero, Mexican Ambassador to the United States.…
Have you ever wondered how a human being has it in him to kill another of his type? Believe it or not there are cruel people out there just like that. People that don’t care who they hurt or what the consequence is, but the benefit they get from it. The great author Truman Capote wrote a non-fictional novel about a great mass murder of his time. The novel that was later made into a movie was called “In Cold Blood”.…
On January 25, 1971, Charles Manson and his followers were brought into court to hear the jury’s verdict. Charles Manson, Patricia Krenwinkel, and Susan Atkins had each been found guilty of one count of conspiracy to commit murder and seven counts of murder in the first degree while Leslie Van Houten had been found guilty of one count of conspiracy to commit murder and two counts of murder in the first degree. The penalty for all four defendants was death on all counts. Bugliosi had stated to the jury, with agreement from the judge, that “If this case were not a proper case for the imposition of the death penalty, no case ever would be. In view of what they did, life imprisonment would be the greatest gift, the greatest charity, the greatest…
The movie A Few Good Men provides a perspective with which to view the issues of the defense of obedience to authority when following instructions from superiors. Stanley Milgram, author of “The Perils of Obedience,” and Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton, authors of “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience,” would likely argue that numerous factors other than intentional sadistic urges could cause a person to unnecessarily inflict violence on another human being. Both articles use psychological methods to examine the reasons a person would knowingly inflict pain on another human. Milgram’s article begins by explaining the dilemma of submission to authority and continues to describe his well-known experiment in its entirety (78-79).…
Conspiracy Introduction The 18 U.S.C § 371, insists that the charge of criminal conspiracy holds if an individual agrees or plots with another to commit an act that if achieved, will be an offense to the law and of itself, It is difficult to determine the crime of conspiracy as it usually entails a verbal agreement between or among persons boiling down to the “he said”, “she said” argument which all depends on the credibility of involved persons (Mustain 1). However, it is assumed that two people conspired to commit a crime if the two are involved in the criminal act. The following paper will argue that John Gotti should be charged for conspiracy to commit murder of three victims in relation to the law on conspiracy. Argument John Gotti is…
The prosecutor purposely bases the majority of Meursault’s trial on his mother’s death, which infuriates Meursault’s lawyer so he addresses the court by saying “Come now, is my client being on trial for burying his mother or for killing a man” (Camus, 96). Although Meursault’s lawyer had a point the prosecution on the other hand eruditely persuaded the jury to view Meursault as a cold-hearted…
When studying areas of conflict, other deviant acts often coincide such as corruption, lack of law, violence, etc . Corruption can be seen as a part of the long equation which equals conflict throughout Mexico. The corruption that occurs in Mexico is related to massive kidnappings and killings, drug violence, and its treacherous government. The Merriam Webster defines corruption as a dishonest or illegal behavior especially by powerful people (such as government officials or police officers); the act of corrupting someone or something; something that has been changed from its original form. All three of these definitions describe the Mexican government 's involvement with the tragic killing of forty-three Ayotzinapa college students.…
Crime Control Name: Institution Affiliation: Date: Crime Control How Emotivism Can Be Used To Understand the Perspective of All Parties except the Student If the practice is approved, emotivism can be used to understand the point of view of all the parties that include the police and the prostitutes. Emotivism notes that moral utterances lack the truth value and only expresses the feelings and emotional worth of the person talking. It, thus, can be used to understand the perspective of the police because they disregard moral in reaching the decisions they react at. For example, they failed to stop and question the women prostitutes.…
Powell, Emilia Justyna. 2006. “Conflict, Cooperation, and the Legal Systems of the World. ”Doctoral Dissertation, Florida State…
pp. 50-52 United States. Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on the Judiciary.…