This is not to gloss over many important details and nuances, such as the Rurik Dynasty, which would be claimed until the 1500s, being of Varangian origin. There is no doubt that the Varangians have had a great impact on the shaping of Rus’. However, the Levin piece, as well as class lectures and the Primary Chronicle, have provided evidence there was not only a Slavic identity prior to the Varangians, but a social and economic order which the Slavic tribes of the Rus’ lands adhered to. These social and economic realities on the ground prior to the arrival of the Varangians serve as the foundations on what would become the Rus’ state, and therefore the Varangians had come to rule over a sociopolitical order that was already in existence. Due to this, the answer to the Normanist debate seems to be anti-Normanist in
This is not to gloss over many important details and nuances, such as the Rurik Dynasty, which would be claimed until the 1500s, being of Varangian origin. There is no doubt that the Varangians have had a great impact on the shaping of Rus’. However, the Levin piece, as well as class lectures and the Primary Chronicle, have provided evidence there was not only a Slavic identity prior to the Varangians, but a social and economic order which the Slavic tribes of the Rus’ lands adhered to. These social and economic realities on the ground prior to the arrival of the Varangians serve as the foundations on what would become the Rus’ state, and therefore the Varangians had come to rule over a sociopolitical order that was already in existence. Due to this, the answer to the Normanist debate seems to be anti-Normanist in