Causes Of The Black Hawk War

Superior Essays
In 1832, ongoing tension in Illinois between American settlers and Native American tribes ignited into a summer of conflict where the participants failed to recognize opportunities to deescalate hostilities. This paper will begin by providing historical information relevant to understanding the conflict’s root causes. The paper will further explain that misunderstandings among both combatants regarding the root causes created an atmosphere that fostered an environment conducive for conflict. Additionally, the paper will reveal that determined American and Native American leadership misjudged situations and opportunities that potentially could have led to the conflict’s avoidance. More specifically, Native American leadership failed to …show more content…
Terms within the treaty stated that the Sauk and Fox tribes would cede their lands east of the Mississippi River to the United States (Lewis, 2014). In return for their land, the Sauk and Fox tribes would immediately receive over $2,000 in goods and a combined annual payment of $1,000 (Trask, 2006). Article II of the treaty outlines the territory the Sauk and Fox tribes ceded to the United States, which covered large areas in present-day northwestern Illinois and southern Wisconsin (Kappler, 1904, p. 74). In all, the total area of land the tribes ceded to the United States was 50 million acres (King, …show more content…
Fighting between the United States and Native Americans in the Old Northwest Territory predated the war by six months (Lewis, n.d.). Black Hawk, who would later lead Sauk and Fox warriors during the war bearing his name, led Sauk warriors during several attacks against the United States during the War of 1812 (Lewis, n.d.). Despite some Native Americans taking up arms against the United States, American officials were able to convince many neutral Sauk and Fox to separate from their tribes (Lewis, n.d.). According to Lewis (n.d.), this would divide many tribal councils and tribes. Keokuk, an important Sauk chief, was one such individual that maintained close and constant relations with the United States (Stevens, 2013). Tribal divisions created during the War of 1812 would surface again. In 1832, Black Hawk would disobey Keokuk and cross the Mississippi River into Illinois, which was the catalyst for the Black Hawk War (Stevens, 2013). Many Native Americans continued to fight even after the War of 1812 ended in 1815 (Lewis, n.d.). Lewis (n.d.) says they kept fighting because they “hoped to recover the lands that they had lost in the previous two decades”. By 1816, the tribes involved in the war had signed treaties with the United States to end hostilities (Lewis, n.d.). The Sauk was the last tribe to sign a treaty with the United States in May

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson made a policy in the 1780s to assimilate American Indians into white society. Andrew Jackson, however, passed a policy of removing Cherokees from their lands to the west of the Mississippi in the 1830s. The common goal of the two policies was to acquire Indian lands because the white colonists wanted to expand westward. Battles went on between the Americans and the American Indians, as one tried to take as the other tried to protect the lands. The policies the presidents passed was to take the lands of the Indians, but they had different ways of doing so.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ever since descendants of Americans came to America we have always had conflicts with the Native Americans also known as the indians. Either it be a war between the two different races or just fighting over irrelevant things. One of the unforgettable events with Americans and the Native Americans was the Trail of Tears which involves the Cherokee nation. When the Americans moved the indians off of the eastern lands and moved them west, it killed off of thousands of Native Americans making it a very memorable and important impact on American history. Strictly defined, the Trail of Tears is the main route or routes that the Cherokees took from the Southeast to the land the U.S. government identified as their new home in Indian Territory (Bjornlund…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The trial of Chief Oshkosh for the murder of Pawnee tribe member Okeguay due to a Menominee tradition of retaliation executions served less as an execution of justice and more as a drawn-out legal proceeding with no direct consequences and massive legal ramifications. This actual intention behind the trial becomes clear through the actions and statements of Judge James D. Doty. Baird records that upon his motion for final judgment in light of the conviction, “the Judge gave, at length, an opinion upon which facts states in the special verdict”. The Judge Doty proclaimed that “as the individual who had been killed by the accused was himself a Indian, and the accused was one of the nation amongst whom a custom existed, allowing the relation of…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pyramid Lake War Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One event is described by Hopkins in book tells of a Washoe chief giving three of his men after the settlers believe that the tribe is responsible for killing two white men, “… because he is afraid that all of us will be killed by you.” The war could not have been prevented. The settlers had chosen not to peacefully live with the Paiute tribes, as well as the other Great Basin tribes. The Indian tribes were actively trying to avoid conflicts with the white settlers, and even help them survive the new lands they had taken.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson was a very controversial President. There are multiple positives and negatives to Andrew Jackson. Andrew is America’s great worst President. I am going to discuss and tell you if you he was a good or bad President is his term from March 4, 1829- March 4, 1837. Before Andrew Jackson was President, he had nine slaves.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The major conflict was that the Cherokee Chief, John Ross, didn’t approve the treaty; that had been negotiated by, one of the Cherokee leaders, Major Ridge who claimed to represent the Cherokee Nation but he spoke only for a small faction . As an illustration “ And whereas a delegation of the Cherokee nation composed of Messrs. John Ross Richard Taylor Danl. McCoy Samuel Gunter and William Rogers with full power and authority to conclude a treaty with the United States did on the 28th day of February 1835 stipulate and agree with the Government of the United States to submit to the Senate to fix the amount which should be allowed the Cherokees for their claims and for a cession of their lands east of the Mississippi river, and did agree to abide by the award of the Senate of the United States themselves and to recommend the same to their people for their final determination,” reveals the falsehood of this statement . Approximately 16,000 Cherokees signed the petition, but regardless Congress approved the treaty. By 1838, only about 1/8 of the Cherokees had left their Georgia homeland for their new territory which led to forced removal by General Winfield Scott and his soldiers to take over the removal process of the ones remaining.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Cherokee Removal

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Perdue and Green’s “The Cherokee Removal, A Brief History with Documents” is an introduction to the social and political period surrounding the removal of Cherokee Indians. The authors’ inclusion of many documents, shares with readers, the Indian voices as well as key political figures’ position on sovereign governance. This complex period is successfully outlined by Perdue and Green, with a chronological account of the Indians’ first encounter with Europeans through the inevitable journey, “Trail of Tears”.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears During the spring semester of 2016, I was given the opportunity to read a very insightful book called, The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears, by Theda Purdue and Micheal D. Green. The book covers the events leading up to, during, and directly after the Trail of Tears. The Trail of Tears was the mass migration of Native Americans from their motherland in the eastern shores of the United States, to the territories of the southwestern United States. Throughout the early 19th Century, there were many conflicts between the government and Native Americans; although none were more racially and economically motivated than that of the state of Georgia and it’s citizens. “We believe the present plan…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Being thus arrived in a good harbor, and brought safe to land, they fell upon their knees and blessed the God of Heaven who had brought them over the vast furious ocean, and delivered them from all the perils and miseries thereof, again to set their feet on the firm and stable earth, their proper element” (Bradford lines 74-79). The heavenly God did not just bring the people of England over to America. Along with the Puritans were countless changes for the Native Americans that were already there. William Bradford’s book “ Of Plymouth Plantation” and “Coming of Age in the Dawnland” written by Charles C. Mann were both about the Puritans and Native Americans. When the settlers came to America, the Native Americans’ lifestyles became different, as they were introduced to a new and different group of people, where they were introduced to another enemy and learned to settle instead of roaming.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Territorial Expansion DBQ

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the greatest developments of the 19th century was the Industrial Revolution, as it paved the way for a new way of living in America. New forms of technology and transportation contributed to the increased expansion from the established eastern cities to the western frontier. Although this expansion created many new possibilities, there was still people who felt expansion was detrimental to the nation. Between 1800 and 1855, supporters and opponents of territorial expansion influenced federal government policy by urging the government to act, or not to, on expansion debate that would affect the future of the nation. During the 1800’s, America was ready to expand but the French held control of New Orleans and the Louisiana territory,…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On May 28th of the year 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed off on a law named the Indian Removal Policy. This granted the United States Government the right to negotiate with the Native American tribes about relocating the Natives from their current home to land west of the Mississippi River. This law was beneficial to the Native Americans on several accounts. The law ended immediate conflict between the Native Americans and the European American Settlers harassing them, it gave them new land to settle instead of just leaving them with no place to go, and even though some relocations were forced instead of voluntary, the law stated that the Native Americans would be provided with protection and aid during and after their relocation.  The…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After reading the text provided I came to the conclusion that the relationship between the Native Americans and the United States was in constant turmoil. The text is littered with many treaties made with the Natives and the effect these had on all parties involved. The westward expansion caused numerous battles and debates among the politicians and tribes. A quote from the article A Shawnee Argues for an Untied Indian Resistance, 1810 states “After mistreatment of the Native Americans by Presidents Jefferson and Madison, Tecumseh, a Shawnee, tried to organize the Midwestern Indian tribes into a united political alliance to thwart the steady advance of the white settlers.” This quote shows the strained relationship between the Natives and the…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The natives had accepted war and conflict as part of their lives. The natives had grown used to disagreements between other tribes, but these were often resolved without much bloodshed. “War was commonplace; indeed, it might be described as normal.” (Carson…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To understand what exactly led to the eventual fighting between the Native Americans and European settlers, one must first learn the cultural differences between them. While, some Native American’s learned to “coexist” with new foreign settlers trading and interacting with them, other natives did not like these invaders and were eventually destroyed, usually by force. These new Europeans tried to bring their new way of life to the natives while these people just wanted to maintain their traditional and natural way of life. Native Americans wanted to live for their family, religion and becoming one with nature. They believed that all things were connected spiritually and that their actions could directly influence nature around them.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As Europeans expanded across the nation the status of Native Americans “changed from a majority culture of peoples living in sovereign nations to a disadvantaged minority living apart from mainstream U.S culture and subordinate to U.S law” (Shaw et.al.2015:31). The model of economic/political disempowerment applies to the Native Americans as seen through the Indian nations loss of land, power, and independence, all of which has had lasting consequences. An example of such model is the decline of sovereignty, in the beginning period of Sovereignty (1700s-1830s) native nations and the British/U. S government entered treaties as co-equals when exchanging demands, doing such over 400 treaties were signed between the groups which suggest that there was a respect for the native communities as being independent nations (Wk:3, Lecture 2). The period of sovereignty declined steadily as Europeans expanded westward which put white settlers into frequent contact with the native population. The white settlers greedily craved the natives land and resources which created conflict that they thought they could resolve with treaties but the growing U.S population proved to be too much to peacefully resolve with treaties.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays