Brutus Opposition To The Constitution Summary

Improved Essays
Part One
In 1776, Americans were primarily focused on creating an independent nation with a government that differed greatly from the King of Britain's. The Declaration of Independence placed a large focus on what the king did wrong, and the founding fathers’ desire to be separated from Britain. As stated in the Declaration, Americans possessed a strong desire to be “absolved from all allegiance to the British crown, and [to have] all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain… totally dissolved.” Moreover, there were several things that the founders disliked about the king, which they included in the Declaration. The king “refused to assent laws, [forbade] his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance,
…show more content…
It argues that the Constitution will turn the states into “one consolidated government”, and that if this happens, people will not have the same opportunities (Federal Farmer). Additionally, it fears that if the Constitution fails, or proves to be unattainable, it will be a detrimental error in trying to create an admirable government. The Farmer also argues that “a free elective government cannot be extended over large territories, [and] one government and general legislature alone never can extend equal benefits to all parts of the United …show more content…
It fears that the Constitution will give officials “the authority to make laws which will affect the lives, the liberty, and property of every man in the United States” (Brutus). Moreover, it argues that the Constitution gives the government unlimited power, and that they can now “collect taxes, imposts, and excises, at their pleasure” (Brutus). Brutus also is opposed to the lack of power it gives states, as “no state can emit paper money—lay any duties, or imposts, or imports, or exports, but by consent of the Congress” (Brutus). Also, as Brutus saw the United States as a large territory, he argued that the Constitution was impractical for a country so large and diverse. Primarily, though, Brutus’ opposes the power, and the opportunity to abuse that power, that the Constitution

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As for Brutus’s concern that the federal court would make state governments unnecessary, this hasn't happened. Of course Brutus had no way of knowing the future, but now we see that even under a large and powerful federal government, state and local governments are still needed to maintain order. They aren't as strong as they were in the early years of the United States, but the Supreme Court has not eradicated them completely. Brutus had very little historical or Constitutional foundation to his fears, which is why I disagree with him on the matter of the Supreme…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the plot revolves around the protagonist, Marcus Brutus, and his actions. Brutus was not only a protagonist; he was also a tragic hero. A tragic hero is a literary character who makes a judgment error that inevitably leads to his/her own destruction. Brutus was characterized as a noble, honorable Roman throughout the entire play. But what did it really mean when his friends, allies, and even enemies described him as this virtuous character when an error in judgment would ultimately lead to his death?…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus, a pseudonym for Robert Gates, was an Anti-Federalist who was against the signing of the Constitution. He wrote to the citizens of New York many documents on his views and why the United States should not be under this new government. In his first paper, he talked about how Congress, the new body of government, could undermine the States under certain circumstances. Also he proposed reasons why this new way of ruling could not rule over such a vast territory that this brand new country came upon on. Many of Brutus’ examples and reasoning still exists in today’s modern era in which these contemporary political circumstances still impact us daily.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Apart from the states ratifying conventions, the debates also took the form of a public discussion, mainly through newspaper editorials, with federalists on one side supporting the constitution, and anti- Federalists objecting to the Constitution. Writers from both sides tried to convince the public that precious liberty and self-government, hard-earned during the late Revolution, were at stake in the question. Anti-federalists such as Centinel, the Federal Farmer, and Brutus argued that the new Constitution will ultimately lead to the dissolution of the state governments, the consolidation of the Union into “one great republic” under an unchecked national government, and as a result the loss of a free, self-government. Brutus particularly alleged that in such an extensive and diverse nation, nothing short of despotism “could bind so great a country under one…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Publius: Case Study

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Publius provides a convincing case for ratification by thoroughly addressing the Antifederalists’ two primary concerns including a potential consolidation of government, and the dangers of hastily ratifying the Constitution. The Federal Farmer summarizes his concerns here: “The plan proposed appears to be partly federal, but principally however, calculated ultimately to make the states one consolidated government. The first interesting question, … is, how far the states can be consolidated into one entire government on free principles.” Governmental consolidation threatens the people’s liberty and this could manifest in a blurred line between branches of government. Furthermore, the Federal Farmer believes, “Aristocrats support and hasten…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He states that due to the written constitution that has been proposed, the state governments are seemingly obsolete due to the specified authority of the United States government. (Brutus, 1787) Without the state governments actively involved in the lawmaking that affects their citizens, the federal government is given the opportunity to make laws that can damage certain groups of people. This includes the powers of the state court system, due to the Supreme Court’s independence from state jurisdiction. If human actions replicate those of the Grecian and Roman republics, a Brutus suggests they will, the judicial powers will be able to obtain the powers that had previously been held by state courts due to the lack of restraints placed upon the federal courts.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The New Constitution The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists had a strictly opposing views about how the people should play in the government. Most of the time, it is the Anti-Federalists are the ones that keeps finding the flaws within the new government, they believed that liberty cannot be attained when people are being ruled by wealthy class men. On the other side, Federalists do not want the ordinary people to become “too” involved in the government, they believe that the people should embrace how the system is going to work which they should “surrender” their power to the republic government. There are also similarities present between the two, both do not promise equal powers, but instead, they wanted the trust of the public.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Issues

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Robert Yates (Brutus I) was a politician and a judge for Anti-Federalist stances. Brutus emphasized on many things such as opposing to the expansion of a national government, worked against the adoption of the Constitution, and was one of the most vocal delegates in support of the protection of individual liberties. Brutus found many issues regarding the legislation granting the government too much power, power given to the judiciary, the preamble setting ends of a clause, and congress granting power over multiple things. These issues became important when they began to affect the liberties of many citizens. Two of Brutus’s main issues/concerns (in which I found interesting) is that the legislation gave the government too much power, and power…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On a wet spring day in 1787, a group of powerful men gathered together to revise the articles of confederation. Instead however, they covertly framed an entirely different form of government, a republic made up of three different branches, judicial, executive, and legislative. Once released to the public, many citizens had extreme doubts about this new government. They feared that because of the government’s size and lack of diverse representation, that it would fail to represent the concerns and interests of the public. They feared that human nature combined with excess of power given to a smaller amount of representatives would result in corruption.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus is portrayed as an extremely noble and patriotic citizen of Rome. His absolute love for Rome causes him to commit to actions that would improve the state of Rome without regarding the morality factor. He is shown to be in turmoil with himself; however, this assertiveness he holds for Rome outweighs far greater than the life of this one man, Caesar. Cassius, knowing fully of this, uses his love for Rome as leverage against Brutus to…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They wanted the king to give them freedom and independence. The Declaration of Independence had four parts; the preamble or the introduction, the second part is the statement that states the rights of all people, a list of the colonists complaints about King George III and the Parliament, and the last part was granting independence for the colonies. The idea to form the Declaration of Independence came through the philosophers John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau. Although the Parliament passed the laws, the colonists wanted the king to take their grievances into action, but he didn't so in April 1775, the colonists fought for freedom. This war is known as the American Revolutionary War.…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Now that Caesar is dead, Brutus automatically takes on his position and wants the people to respect and regard him as the new leader of Rome. Thus, making him able to organize and control the funeral service. However, he chose to go first in giving his speech. Thinking that he would say enough and no one would care about what Antony had to say, this a major flaw with this order because the crowd will most likely remember the speech that was given last not first. His speech is not as heartfelt and emotional as Antony’s, making it less persuasive.…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Is A Patriot Essay

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus was a patriot and a savior for the people of Rome because he sacrificed his good friend to ensure that Romans would not be enslaved. His actions showed that the people of Rome and their safety come first; him maintaining a relationship with Julius Caesar was a priority for Brutus. Brutus knew that if he did not follow through with his plan, he would regret it for the rest of his life and Romans would die as slaves. Although some would say that Brutus was untrustworthy, by carrying out this attack, he showed how passionate he was about the citizens of Rome. While killing his best friend seemed like an awful thing to many people, Brutus’ decision was indeed correct.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Caesar is becoming the king of Rome soon, but Cassius, Casca, Cinna, Trebonius, Metellus Cimber, and Caius Ligarius all don’t think of him as their ideal king and they go to extreme measures to prevent him from wearing the crown, but he does have friends willing to help like Antony who would seem to be his only friend. But where does Brutus stand in all this, is he friend or foe, and to who or whom. It will be determined how Brutus’ choses made him a patriot and not a traitor. Brutus is a good person, though people would probably say that he is a traitor because in the first act, second scene He says “I do fear, the people Choose Caesar for their king.”…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Appeal Analysis

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    INTRODUCTION Background of the Study History is full of kings, queens, their ambitions, their vulgar aggrandizements and their cruelties combined with a sybaritic life and eroticism, having no concern for common man who is quashed in every circumstance. The common man has been suffering in every sphere of life by one way or another. The 16th was the first century when people could rise in society through talent and merit. In previous centuries it was rare for a person to rise above the social station in which he was born.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays