Broward County: Case Study

Decent Essays
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION
CASE NO. COWE-14-010356 (83)

Hunter Run Homeowners Association
Of Broward county Plaintiff,
Vs.

Clement Watkins, (Pro Se) Defendant. ________________________________________/

Motion: OBJECTION TO FORECLOSURE SALE
COMES NOW Pro Se Defendant Clement Watkins, and objects to foreclosure sale.
• Pro Se Defendant argues that a foreclosure sale was conducted at the Broward County Court House in the above style case on Friday November 3, 2017.

• Pro Se Defendant argues that such a sale should not have been conducted. Based on multiple objections; no proper notification of the sale of the property was given, Service Members Civil Relief Act (SCRA) prevents the sale of the home and that the property is currently on the market for sale and a current offer has been accepted.

…show more content…
Military.

• On July 20, 2017, Stevens & Goldwyn the firm representing Hunter Run Association was noticed of the approved short sale by CitiMortgage.

• On Oct 24, 2017, two motions were submitted to stop the sale of the property at 714 Holly St. North Lauderdale on November 3, 2017.

• Motion to stop the sale on the grounds that the sale of the home is prohibited under the Service Members Civil Relief Act (SCRA).

• Second motion requesting stopping the sale to allow the completion of the short sale, which was granted by

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Joe Houston Case Summary

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The district court granted Marod’s motion to dismiss Houston’s claims based on a lack of standing to bring the Title III claim. The…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stevan Jakovljevic Professor Avdeev Law 2010-05 Fall 2016 Case Brief Term Researched: Duty of Care Case Name: Howard D. Brunson (Plaintiff-Respondent) v. Affinity Federal Credit Union Legal Citation: 954 A.2d 550 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 2008) Date Decided:…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Grande vs. Jennings/McCallum 1 CA-CV 11-0148 The Court of Appeals, State of Arizona 2012 FACTS: The petitioners before the State of Court are Karen Spann Grande (daughter of Robert Spann and the representative of the Spann estate) and Kim Spann (another daughter of Robert Spann). The Respondents before the court are Sarina Jennings and Clinton McCallum, the newest owners of Robert Spann’s estate. Jennings and McCallum hired Trinidad Builders Inc. to do work on the estate. The head of this contracting company is Randy Bueghly and one of the key employees in this case is Rafael Cuen who found the money left behind by Mr. Spann.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Appellant V Luis Ortiz

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    requirements of Miranda or whether the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his rights”. (wicourts.gov) STATE of Iowa, Appellant, v. Luis Fernando ORTIZ, Appellee, This case was filed in the Supreme Court of Iowa and was decided in 2009. On July 15, 2006, a woman called the Sioux City Police Department to report that Luis Ortiz, who she hired to do remodeling work in her house, “had forced her seven-year-old daughter to touch his penis”. After a brief meeting with Ortiz Detective Bertrand asked ortiz is he was willing to go to the police station with him for an interview. Once both arrived to the police station Detective Bertrand and Salvador Sanchez, a Sioux City officer, acting as translator, handed Ortiz a Voluntary Waiver of Rights…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plaintiff at trial was Cellco Partnership, now Appellant. Defendant at trial, Shelby County, now Appellee. Facts: Cellco Partnership, Appellant, originally entered a lease agreement in 1995 with Cellco Partnership (Verizon) allowing an easement to Stonebridge Water Tower. In 2000, Highway 64 learned that Verizon had installed cellular equipment on Stonebridge Water Tower and accused them of trespassing and threatened to file a suit against them. In 2001, Verizon (Cellco Partnership) filed a complaint against Shelby County and Highway 64 seeking a declaratory judgement stating the Verizon has the right to use the gravel access road or a declaratory judgement stating that Shelby County must provide Verizon with access to Stonebridge Water Tower, security from Shelby County to cover liability Verizon incurred from third parties as a result of a breach of the Verizon Lease, and an injunction…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Supreme Court Case Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council many of the questions proposed above can be answered. David Lucas purchased two vacant ocean front lots on a barrier island near Charleston,…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case: Katzenbach v. Grant 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46756 *; 2005 WL 1378976 Facts: The Plaintiffs, Katzenbach and Osuna filed a lawsuit against Defendant Grant over a film and book rights. Grant owns a website called “thenightexposed” (www.thenightexposed.net). The Plaintiffs claim that Grant caused problems with negotiations with Sony Pictures and the USA Network. Plaintiff further claims that Grant sent a letter calling Osuna book a fake and made other defamatory articulations about the Plaintiffs on his website.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Study Vaso Case

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comments: Vaso continues to carry one of the largest caseloads in this Unit. She has resolved more case than any other prosecutor in the office. Vaso has established and built upon her excellent relationships with nearly every Commonwealth’s Attorney Offices in the Roanoke MFCU region. During this reporting period, she has presented cases in the Cities of Martinsville, Lynchburg, and Radford. In addition, she has presented cases in the Counties of Nelson, Franklin, Rockingham, Henry, and Montgomery.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kelo Case

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Legal Brief Assignment Sociology 2309 Law and Society, Spring 2016 Cody Paterson Kelo et al. v. CITY OF NEW LONDON et al. Certiorari to the supreme court of Connecticut Procedural History: The Kelo case was appealed by petitioners to the New London Superior Court where the court granted a restraining order prohibiting the taking of some of the properties, but denying relief as to others, and was affirmed in part and reversed in part by the Connecticut Supreme Court.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    ) ) The Plaintiff, Carl Ameche (hereinafter “Ameche”), complaining of the Defendants, Margie Congdon (hereinafter “Congden”) and Maple Meadows Campground (hereinafter “Maple”) would show unto this Honorable Court as follows: JURISDICTION ALLEGATIONS 1. Ameche is a citizen and…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If the landowner does not want to sell, the government can file a court action to exercise eminent domain, and serves or publishes notice of the hearing as required by law. The use, and at times abuse, of this law contributes to ethical dilemmas arising, as with the legal case of The Cottonwood…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 28 and Dkt. 28 Exhibit A”) should be denied. Defendants’ aver that the Motion to Amend the First Complaint is futile, intended to delay the adjudication of the Defendants’ Motion on the Pleadings and for Summary Judgment (Dkt.26) (“Motion”), and that same is being made in bath faith. Providing no legal basis for her position, Plaintiff simply proposes the same flawed legal theories that she asserted in her original Complaint, but now provides further allegations in her Proposed First Amended Complaint (Dkt 28-2 Exhibit “B”) as same allegedly pertains to both “enterprise and “individual” coverage theories. The Defendants’ contend that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sam Clover Case Study

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I. Introduction Our client, Sam Clover (“Clover”), is a battalion chief for the Los Angeles County Fire Department (“LAPD”) and a thirty-four-year employee of the LAFD. On March 4th, 2016 Clover arrived home from work and found his home on fire. After alerting the LAFD, Clover entered his home and rescued his wife from the fire. Unfortunately, a part of the roof collapsed on Clover and injured him.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. Goods versus Services. A. ISSUE: Discuss fully whether the contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of goods or the sale of serv¬ices. The contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of services because the Palermos orally agreed to the purchase and installation of the carpet.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    THIRD ISSUE: RESPONDENT has valid grounds for avoidance of the Sales Contract on 7 July 2014 and 9 July 2014 B.CLAIMANT did breach the Sales Contract on 4 July 2014 and 8 July 2014 I. CLAIMANT breached the Sales Contract for the inconsistency between the Sales Contract and the letter of Credit opened on 4 July 2014 1. The CISG applies to the merits of the case at issue Pursuant to Article 20 of the Sales Contract [Cl. Exh.1, p. 7], “The contract, including this clause, shall be governed by the law of Danubia”. As Danubia is a Contracting State to the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (hereinafter CISG) [R.A., p. 5, para.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays