Illustrating the effects of body cameras on police officers, a study conducted by Barak Ariel, a professor at Cambridge University, William Farrar, another professor at Cambridge University, and Alex Sutherland, the Rialto police chief analyzed the implementation of body cameras in the first year that it was in use in Rialto, California. It concluded, “[the] use of force by officers fell 60 percent, while citizen complaints against police plunged 88 percent” (Volz). With time, it is clear that there is a relationship between body cameras and the reduction of incidents of unnecessary force because there was a decrease in the usage of force by sixty percent in the first year of the implementation of body cameras. Furthermore, the correlation between the number of complaints and the number of police officers using unnecessary force is present in the study when the study concluded with a reduction in the number of complaints after the use of force dropped. Similarly, San Jose, a bigger city compared to Rialto, experienced the same effects. San Jose’s Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee reported, “Complaints have fallen 40.5% and use of ‘personal body’ force by officers has been reduced by 46.5%...” (Perry). Like the Rialto study, it is clear that body cameras will set a chain of events that will lead to the reduction in the usage of force by police officers. Furthermore, as the number of complaints drop, it clearly establishes how the public is reducing their accusations about police officers using unnecessary force, which enables police officers to do their duty without being falsely accused of a crime. By establishing a relationship between body cameras and the reduction of police officers using unnecessary force in two different cities, it provides evidence that body
Illustrating the effects of body cameras on police officers, a study conducted by Barak Ariel, a professor at Cambridge University, William Farrar, another professor at Cambridge University, and Alex Sutherland, the Rialto police chief analyzed the implementation of body cameras in the first year that it was in use in Rialto, California. It concluded, “[the] use of force by officers fell 60 percent, while citizen complaints against police plunged 88 percent” (Volz). With time, it is clear that there is a relationship between body cameras and the reduction of incidents of unnecessary force because there was a decrease in the usage of force by sixty percent in the first year of the implementation of body cameras. Furthermore, the correlation between the number of complaints and the number of police officers using unnecessary force is present in the study when the study concluded with a reduction in the number of complaints after the use of force dropped. Similarly, San Jose, a bigger city compared to Rialto, experienced the same effects. San Jose’s Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee reported, “Complaints have fallen 40.5% and use of ‘personal body’ force by officers has been reduced by 46.5%...” (Perry). Like the Rialto study, it is clear that body cameras will set a chain of events that will lead to the reduction in the usage of force by police officers. Furthermore, as the number of complaints drop, it clearly establishes how the public is reducing their accusations about police officers using unnecessary force, which enables police officers to do their duty without being falsely accused of a crime. By establishing a relationship between body cameras and the reduction of police officers using unnecessary force in two different cities, it provides evidence that body