However, where there is an obvious compelling state interest to protect, state regulations are constitutional. Commerce Clause deals with issues beyond conflicts within federal power. The explanation given for the clause exhibits the amount of commerce the state can manage without interrupting in the congressional domain of interstate commerce. Jennings (2018) proposed, “In answering this this question, the courts are concerned with two factor: (1) whether federal regulation supersedes state involvement and (2) whether the benefits achieved by the regulation outweigh the burden on interstate commerce” (p. 147). These two factors are put in place to help prevent states from passing laws that would cause local organizations unfair advantages over interstate businesses. States are able to regulate interstate commerce under some circumstances. Properly exercising police power is when these circumstances occur. Police power is a states’ power to pass laws that assist to protect health and safety and public
However, where there is an obvious compelling state interest to protect, state regulations are constitutional. Commerce Clause deals with issues beyond conflicts within federal power. The explanation given for the clause exhibits the amount of commerce the state can manage without interrupting in the congressional domain of interstate commerce. Jennings (2018) proposed, “In answering this this question, the courts are concerned with two factor: (1) whether federal regulation supersedes state involvement and (2) whether the benefits achieved by the regulation outweigh the burden on interstate commerce” (p. 147). These two factors are put in place to help prevent states from passing laws that would cause local organizations unfair advantages over interstate businesses. States are able to regulate interstate commerce under some circumstances. Properly exercising police power is when these circumstances occur. Police power is a states’ power to pass laws that assist to protect health and safety and public