Benefits Of The Commerce Clause

Improved Essays
According to Jennings (2018), “The Commerce Clause is found in Article I, Section 8, Part 3, of the U.S. Constitution and provides Congress with the power “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among several States” (p.143). The constitution itemizes certain powers within the federal government. Powers that is not authorized to Congress by the Constitution is remoted for the state due to the establishment of the Tenth Amendment. Congress has been observed using the Commerce Clause to explain exercising legislative authority over the activities of states and their citizens. This exercise has resulted to significant increase and rising controversy pertaining to the balance of power amongst the federal government and the states. The Commerce Clause permits Congress to regulate …show more content…
However, where there is an obvious compelling state interest to protect, state regulations are constitutional. Commerce Clause deals with issues beyond conflicts within federal power. The explanation given for the clause exhibits the amount of commerce the state can manage without interrupting in the congressional domain of interstate commerce. Jennings (2018) proposed, “In answering this this question, the courts are concerned with two factor: (1) whether federal regulation supersedes state involvement and (2) whether the benefits achieved by the regulation outweigh the burden on interstate commerce” (p. 147). These two factors are put in place to help prevent states from passing laws that would cause local organizations unfair advantages over interstate businesses. States are able to regulate interstate commerce under some circumstances. Properly exercising police power is when these circumstances occur. Police power is a states’ power to pass laws that assist to protect health and safety and public

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It states that Congress can not only have a say in interstate markets but in personal local markets and commerce as well, or any action that intercedes or obstructs interstate…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Essay

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Once the court arrived to the supreme court, Gibbons’s attorney claimed that federal laws suppress the state laws with congress being allowed to control interstate trade. Although Gibbons had won the case, Ogden created the argument that Congress could only regulate trade at the borders where two states meet not within the whole state. Ogden lost the case because John Marshall had said that the commerce clause applied not only to interstate trade at borders, but within in all conflicts within the…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should powers like these rest in the hands of the federal government or does it belong to the states? According to Larson, “fearing consolidation at the hands of distant elites, or jealous of local advantages, most congressmen refused to vest that authority [for a national system of internal improvements] in the president or any other agents who might injure their interests at home.” (384) Adam only feeds into this fear of a strong federal…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At a time when the nation was struggling to repay itʻs war debts as well as re-establishing itʻs trade market, the restrictions the Articles placed on itʻs governing body, impacted 3 vital areas of the economy: trade, currency, and taxes. Under the Articles of Confederation, the Continental Congress had no ability to regulate trade, except with Native Americans, as long as they did not impinge upon a stateʻs interests. Although Congress could negotiate treaties with foreign countries, which the states could not do, they could in no way influence trade deals, foreign or domestic. This led to each state having their own system of trade policies. (Brackemyre, n.d.)…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dating back to the 1770s, there has been a significant amount of support for strong national powers by our nation’s government in regards to interstate commerce. The scope of the Commerce Clause outlines that, “Congress shall have power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes” (Art. I, S. 8, Cl. 3). Interstate commerce encompasses any work involving or related to the movement of persons or materials across state lines or from foreign countries. The parameters of the policy were tested in the Supreme Court case of Gibbons v. Ogden, decided by John Marshall in 1824.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The court can declare state regulations unconstitutional if deem to be unreasonable on interstate commerce. Federal preemption gives congress the power to regulate an entire field even if no conflict exists between state and federal…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was considered weak because it has no authority over interstate and foreign trade matter. States are free to conduct their own respective business and the federal government has no say to whatever states do. So, with states acting like its own sovereign nation rather than a type of government under the federal government, the relationship between the two government is chaotic. In this paper, I am going to discuss further details about why federal government was considered weak under the Articles of Confederation and the changes that were written into the Constitution of the United States that solves the interrelationship problem between the federal and states under the Articles of…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If Congress had control over the trade regulations of the nation, they may have been able to create policies that ushered in a more positive trading relationship between it and the United Kingdom. Instead, each of the thirteen states had thirteen different trade policies with each other and with foreign countries like the UK, which created fragmentation within the Union on trade policy. When Congress tried to create a nationwide impost (tax) on imported goods, some states rejected it, like Rhode Island in their letter to Congress claimed that the “proposed impost is repugnant to the liberty of the United States” and rejected…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “...there are implied as well as express powers... there is another class of powers... resulting powers...” (Doc C) expressed powers are known, implied powers are up to interpretations of the Constitution and finally, resulting powers, which would simply be the government acquiring land in treaties or conquering and in turn setting up a government. This all matters because of the economic and trade. During this time, as stated in class lectures, there was a separate tax for each state goods would travel through, which was one of the problems the Articles of Confederation could never get rid of.…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One provision in the Constitution is the "Commerce Clause which refers to Article1, Section 8, Clause 3 it gives Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes. The commerce clause was viewed as a grant of congressional authority and as a restriction on the regulatory authority of the States" (law.cornell, n.d). The commerce clause is not clear because the Congress is the one that controls the trading and buying of foreign nation, the phrase was meant to let Americians know that the federal government and not the states are the ones that regulates who we trade with. The phrase "among the state" is a commonly used phrase that is used between the federal and state…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The only power that the states were not allowed concerned the ability to compose foreign treaties. If the central government was only allowed a specific amount of trade power, then there was little to no economic collocation amongst the states and its people. Each policy differed greatly from each…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Luke Stafford PS 110 7/21/15 States and Federal Government Rights Does the Federal government have too much control? Is the Federal Government oppressive to the people and States of America? Or are states’ rights well protected in the constitution and political practice? To answers any of these questions, we need to look back and see what the Constitution is and the path that was taken by the founders to where we ended up with the Constitution.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress’ ability to regulate trade has been proved to be a very important way in how the congress regulates the states. Committee of the Whole: A committee made from the house that takes a closer look at laws…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The State government runs the state that it is in and they are a higher level of government than the local level, which controls whatever city of county that they are in. One of the State government’s roles is to promote the state’s economy and take control over a lot of the government programs, such as risk and social management programs (Norman, 2008). Also just like how the Federal government controls the State government, the State government controls and watches over the the Local government’s of the State’s counties and cities. Another added power that the states have is that the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution states that any and all powers that aren’t under the Federal government’s control is then reserved to later be put under the states and it’s people. All state governments are complex and exact duplicates of the federal government and are made up of three different branches of government; executive, legislative, and judicial.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Commerce Clause originated in the U.S. Constitution in Article 1, Section 8, of Part 3. This clause limits congress to the regulation of interstate commerce. Which means that the congress has the power to delegate what goes on between commerce and foreign nations (Jennings, 2014). The Commerce Clause has verifiable been seen as both a gift of congressional power and as a limitation on states' forces to control. The Commerce Clause alludes to the forbiddance against states passing representation that victimizes or astronomically troubles interstate trade.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays