Police Body Cameras Research Paper

Improved Essays
already view them as criminals and cannot feel sympathy for what happened to them. Instead, they use their preconceptions about the victim based on their skin color rather than looking at the situation as a bigger picture.
Historically, the justice system is biased towards people of color. With cases that date back to fifty years such as Emmett Till and more recent cases such as Trayvon Martin. These are cases when there is more than enough evidence to convict the defendants, but the verdict is “not guilty”. In The Coming of John, John kills a white man for raping his sister. He was immediately lynched by the community (Dubois). John received no proper trial for killing the white man. Although he committed a murder, it was more like a crime
…show more content…
in “Considering Police Body Cameras” 1795). There is a lot of controversy about the use of body cameras and police officers. Body cameras are intended to make the public feel safer around police officers. They are supposed to capture every interaction that a police officer has with a citizen. There are mixed feelings from citizens about the use of police body cameras. Some people feel that it will improve the relationship of police officers and citizens, while others feel as though it will not change the way bad police officers act towards people of color. There are definitely pros and cons of the usage of body cameras. In “Considering Police Body Cameras”, the author writes that body cameras can be used by training camps to show new officers what a day on the job is like (1802). This can be very beneficial to training camps because it gives new officers a real life view of what they will be encountering working as a police officer. The new officers will have a better understanding of what to do when arresting a citizen, instead of resorting to excessive force. This will mean less excessive force complaints, which ultimately will save police departments’ time and …show more content…
Although there is footage a bad incident of a police officer and a citizen, the officer can still not be indicted or convicted of their actions because of the biased criminal justice system. The officers of the Rodney King and the Eric Gardner incidents did not have body cameras, but there was still clear footage of what happened. The officers of both victims were not held accountable for their actions. The footage on a body camera is no different than the footage from a camcorder or a cell phone camera. This proves that body cameras are useless to spend money on because bystanders can record a bad altercation of a police officer and a citizen. In this day and age of social media and technology, a cell phone video recording can spread like wild fire on a social media platform and can end up appearing on news stations across the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, he is an expert in this field and has much experience dealing with cases regarding the consequences of police brutality due to the government not implementing body cameras. In addition, the author provides a reason to believe by uniquely expressing his viewpoint and boldly stating his opinion on the effect of body cameras on police officers and citizens. O’Mara states, “People act better when they know they're being watched -- or recorded. Cops act better, and the people they encounter on the street are more cooperative.” O’Mara references a studied commissioned by the Police Foundation in 2012 that displays statistical evidence proving few force incidents with body cameras.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being able to answer the questions would make it easier to write a police body camera policy because it would identify and answer who, what, how and why for the policy. Once the legislature has the answers, it may be able to adopt a policy that is agreeable to all parties involved. In conclusion, adopting a body camera policy may help deter police violence and misconduct allegations that may occur while interacting with the public. The officers being recorded by the cameras should help with the performance their duties in a professional…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This however could be contradictory if the officer does not tell or report the whole story. Without clear limits, body worn cameras may become just another tool for law enforcement rather than a mechanism for police accountability. Several studies on police body cameras have encouraging…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Body Cameras Pros And Cons

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some people might say that the police officers use of body cameras violates their right of privacy. Often it is questioned about the people that get caught on camera as bystanders and the effect of them being shown in the courtrooms even if it’s not them they are focusing on. In particular, the most troubling aspect of recording will occur when camera-equipped officers are inside people 's homes, whenever police enter — including in instances of consensual entry in example, responding to a burglary call, voluntarily participating in an investigation, and such things as domestic violence calls. Some people might feel it is an abuse of privacy while others just see it as a security measure. The people have said that if the police officers wear body cameras anytime a police officer gets near them they know what to expect, and therefore it’s not an abuse of…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Body Cameras If only we had evidence of what truly went down between that teenage boy and that police officer. If only we could see the truth unfold through a television screen. A camera’s purpose is to capture a live moment, preserve it, and share it with others. Body cameras on police officers should be mandatory because they will help monitor police behavior, provide evidence, and instill trust.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The article Police Body Cameras analyzes the possible outcomes of this idea. The article states that using body cameras could offer protection to both parties, equating to a win-win scenario. Not only would the footage “protect the public against police misconduct”, but it would also “protect the police against false accusations of abuse” (p. 8). The footage collected from the cameras would offer accurate account of incidents which have in the past been blurred with bias against police as well as the blue shield of trust which protects fellow officers from their wrongdoing with cover up stories. The same article further explains that body cameras could be the bridge of trust needed between the public and law enforcement through the feeling of security they provide.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Body cameras serve a critical role in preventing violence. Both subjects are less likely to use physical aggression while the camera is active. Einvestigator tries to have body-cameras passed as a law in hopes that both subjects will act on a better manner. In regards to both the Ferguson and Baltimore cases, there is a good chance neither Wilson nor the six cops found guilty would…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ever been falsely of accused of any type of crime or been taking to jail because you supposedly was disrespecting an police officer ? its your word against there's most time there's not enough evidence to back you up so you might end up paying for crime you didn't do . Since the the shooting death of an unarmed black teenage in August 2014 police officers are equipped to be with body cameras . Personally I think wearing body cameras should be a requirement because too many illegal use of force has been shrouded from public view by the means of dishonest reporting done by police officers and it can also help reduce the numbers of complaints by the citizens that are against the police.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the past 10 years there has been many talks on whether the police should be required to wear body cameras. Throughout all the research and studies regarding these cameras, these have been many pros to body cams but there have also been cons and many challenges to implementing this system in police forces throughout the country. Many different police stations have done experiments with these cameras and have all shown very positive feedback. Regardless of the amount of work necessary to implement these cameras, it should be necessary for officers to wear these body cameras because they have the potential to save lives. To go along with that, police should be forced to wear these body cameras because they have the potential to save lives, give better representation than hearing a testimony, and make suspects less likely to run or attack an officer because everything they do is caught on camera.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cameras have many positive features to them a few of them would be that the videos give solid evidence to hold people accountable for their actions, people are more aware of their actions when the cameras are present so there have been fewer complaints made, also, the use of force has also decreased since police have started using the cameras. One of the biggest things that body cameras offer is the video evidence that they give. With this evidence the officers and the civilians can be held accountable for their own actions. Before the body cameras, there were dash cams.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the cameras offer footage to defend the victim (or police officer) in a brutality case, when are the cameras unnecessary and an invasion of privacy? If public access is permitted, what are the boundaries to protect the personal information of ones being recorded? “Without the right safeguards, there is a real risk that these new devices could become instruments of injustice” (Mendoza). According to the article “Police Body Cameras,” if anyone can access the footage, and the footage contains addresses, family life, or other sorts of private information of ones recorded, it could potentially put them in danger; this could cause victims to avoid police officer interaction, which leads to less crimes stopped. If public access is not permitted to the body camera footage, the footage is untrustworthy; “limiting public and media access to these videos undermines the very purpose of body cameras” (“Police Body Cameras”).…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Body Cameras

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The numbers recorded from this had a great turn out. This experiment showed that when police officers wear body cameras while on duty, the amount of crime as well as complaints on officers is significantly lower than with cops who do not wearing body cameras. To be exact, the use of force by officers wearing cameras dropped 59 percent while complaints on cops dropped a staggering 87 percent from the previous year.(P Foundation) This stuck out to the public so much that even the President began to encourage police to wear body cameras. President Obama then went to Congress to ask for funding for fifty thousand body worn cameras nationwide.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Police Body Cameras

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Who Should Have Access to Police Body Camera Footage? Technology is on the rise and so is police brutality, but with one we may be able to remedy the other. Police body cameras have been in use in certain police departments across America since 2012. Ever since the controversial death of Mr. Michael Brown the idea of body cameras has exploded into a legal race for control over videos that don 't yet exist. There are a spectrum of views regarding the public’s access to these videos which the LA Times eloquently sums up in their article “When it comes to police body cameras, the public can 't be kept in the dark.”…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, when police officers wear body cameras it is beneficial to the suspect, as well as the officer, because they provide an unbiased account of what truly happened. The American people have been pushing the issue of body cameras because there have been multiple instances where unarmed African-American men and others have been shot and killed as a result of police brutality. The media has played a significant role in the introduction of body cameras. Civilians have used their cell phones…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Importance Of Body Cameras

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages

    With the right regulations body cameras will be very beneficial. Body cameras are necessary because they provide justice for victims of police misconduct, help police officers, and reduce misconduct. Body cameras help provide justice for the victims of police misconduct. Multiple police officers have taken advantage of their power and abused citizens. The Wall Street Journal reports that, “ Police commissioner William Bratton placed a detective on desk duty and stripped him of his badge, gun, and assignment after he was caught on cellphone video berating a taxi driver in expletive -filled, xenophobic tirade.”…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics