Apush Dbq Analysis

Great Essays
Newly attained independence upon the denouement of the Revolution, provoked fierce debate concerning the proper governmental path. America was divided into two factions: Federalists and Republicans. James Madison in unison with his fellow federalists pursued a centralized government and ratification of the Constitution. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 assembled to address the increasingly overt weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation. Inclusion of a Bill of Rights evoked dissention among the delegates, as Federalists feared new governing body would become “a government of delegated powers” . Discussion pertaining to slavery also took precedence at the talks in Philadelphia Conversely, Patrick Henry and the Republicans supported the …show more content…
Federalist prevailed because they identified the proper path to American prosperity. Centralization is an imperative facet of a successful national government, thus eliminating governmental dissention between states. A sectionalist government was not adequate for the United Sates, a newborn nation requiring unity. The Federalists and Republican debate can be justifiably attributed as the fountainhead of the political party system. The ratification of the Constitution outlines the powers and rights of the government, ensuring the citizens free from oppression and tyranny. Americans’ rights and liberties are overtly expressed through the Bill of Rights. Federalists and Republicans possessed contradicting views of the same document, fueling debate. Key Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton intelligently reformed the American economy, eliminating the national debt. The Federalist Papers strategically expressed the movement’s motivations and ideals, thus bolstering support. More than 200 years later, the Federalist-Antifederalist debate comprised of the same key issues that face our nation

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The task of our ADI was to find out what strategies, battles, and people affected the outcome of the Civil War. Our guiding question was, “How does time, place, strategie, political, economic and geographic leadership affect the outcome of the Civil war?” Our group used a pie chart and a map of the Civil war that shows the battles. With the map we marked the important battles, minor battles and the Gettysburg Address. In the pie chart we marked the advantage and who had it.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Government that was created after the Revolutionary war was too weak to mend the conflicts that were arising from the States; the Government was operating under the Articles of Confederation. The Philadelphia Convention agreed to help correct some of the holes in the Articles that had long since been determined even before the war. The Philadelphia Convention was held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from May 14th to September 17th in the year of 1787. Even though the Convention was actually proposed to revise the articles, James Madison, residing from Virginia, and Alexander Hamilton, from New York, had something entirely different in mind. Madison and Hamilton did not intend on revising the Articles but rather creating a new Government rather than fixing the one that was already agreed upon.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Constitutional Convention, one of the major issues facing the Framers involved the sharing of power between the state and national government. Even after having succeeded in becoming independent from Britain the colonists still viewed themselves as members of separate states. The Nation needed a strong centralized government that also protected the power of the states. Thus the Federalist American form of government was created.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    During the summer of 1787, representatives from each of the thirteen colonial states, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, two starkly contrasting groups of state delegates, had gathered to discuss a new Constitution to replace the failed Articles of Confederation. Namely, the delegates had debated as to whether or not the new ruleset should have taken effect, as they possessed highly dissimilar viewpoints regarding the Constitution. There were several Anti-Federalist arguments against the Constitution’s ratification, alongside numerous counterarguments by the Federalists in its support. Specifically, the Anti-Federalists had been primarily concerned with the federal and state governments of the United States, fearing tyranny and excessive…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush 2000 Dbq Analysis

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Elana Shpunt APUSH DBQ 2000 March 13, 2017 To what extent was organized labor in improving the position of workers in the 19th century successful? After several years of Reconstruction and proceedings of the Civil War; the Gilded Age commenced as the American economy and population emerged in premodern civilization. In the Nineteenth century, the Second Industrial Revolution altered the factory system and how jobs were operated.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These sources help us understand the post-Revolutionary era and the debate over the Constitution of 1787, because at the time that the American nation was still in its infancy, there was great debate over what would become the framework of the United States government that we know today, the Constitution. The nation was split between two groups, the Federalists, or the supporters of the Constitution, and the Anti-Federalists, who opposed it. There were three significant disagreements between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, the first of which was the amount of power that the central government should have, as the two groups were torn between how to balance powers between the states and central government. The second was decision of whether…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The emotional and dramatic debates of 1787 initiated an event turning change in the structure of the United States government. The passion of James Madison’s ambition to create an equally powered federal government through the division of government branches have set foot to what the modernized American system is seen today. Rakove elaborates in great detail of the trials and errors which the delegates of the 1787 Convention had to endure. However, without the strenuous debates, contemplating opinions, and theoretical views of the Virginia Plan delegates against the New Jersey Plan delegates, the American nation would fail to stand on the strong values of equal government power. From the various attempts to create an organized federal government power and Constitution, the intentions of the delegates of the 1787 Convention were centered upon the values of theory and philosophy rather than…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Debate

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When considered within the context of the weak Articles of Confederation, the political divide between those who wanted a strong central government and those who wanted a weak central government played a key role in the 1780s in the United States. However, this disunity was not a crisis, but a catalyst for a debate and conversation that would center around the political ethos of the country. Many philosophies came out of this new conversation, with the most polarizing one being Federalism. Many of these new ideas would take center stage in Philadelphia at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which was necessitated by this ideological split. Compromise between both sides of the debate allowed the Constitution to be completed and later ratified by all of the states in 1789, as there were aspects of the new American government that satisfied both the framers and the states.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the Revolution came near the end, Americans decided there needed to be a set of laws in place, for the independence that will be gained if they win the war. The first set of rules to be drafted is known as the Articles of Confederation. Seeing that it was America’s first attempt at a government, it is quite obvious that there were many issues with the rules and provisions created, which caused problems in the new nation and stress among political leaders. The Articles of Confederation caused economic, legislative and leadership problems, along with unrest in the Anti-Federalist Party as shown in Documents A, spoken by Melancton Smith and Document B written by Brutus 1.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalist Papers are one of the most important pieces of American Government and history. These eighty-five letters were very significant because they were compelling in inducing states to ratify the new Constitution instead of sticking to the weak Articles of Confederation. The authors of the Federalist Paper’s utilized sensible arguments to clarify the importance of such a change. These authors confronted the arguments colonists were making against the ratification of the new Constitution. After the letters were published in the newspapers, colonists against the change, sent letters back commending the new ideas in the constitution the United States has today.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Fear of America’s Future The start of the American nation began with a decision that needed to be made, to continue with a federalist government or a new era of democratic-republican party. Federalist and republicans had two distinct ways they wanted the US government to function. To me the right choice would be republican, because this type of government gave power to the people. Republican party wanted a more limited national government.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am persuaded that the Federalist [Hamiltonian] political approach toward governing the young United States had stronger ideas versus the Republican [Jeffersonian] position, which lacked in forward thinking, suppressed free marketing and trade, sought to reduce the national army, and yet supported virtue of the common people. The American Revolution caused high war-debt issues, requiring immediate and effective attention, which in my opinion demanded a strong centralized government. Hamilton’s group, the Federalists, were made up of mostly educated bankers, merchants, and manufactures with some wealthy plantation owners interested in securing the future of the Union by force of “big government”. They believed that government control should be in the hands of the elite and wealthy, that there should be a National Bank, and the establishment of public credit, saying it was authorized by the constitution as “necessary and proper”. Hamilton wrote, “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men the great difficulty lies in this:…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to realize that the foundation of the United States federal government didn’t form into what it is today overnight, it took time. The government faced some major challenges during the 1790s-1800, including the split of the United States government. The split of the United States government formed two political parties, the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans. The Federalist Party was formed in 1791 by Alexander Hamilton and other supporters of a strong government who also favored the Constitution. On the other hand, the Democratic - Republican Party was formed by Thomas Jefferson and others who believed in a democratic government and opposed of the ratification of the Constitution.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fifty Federalists, with the same general idea of creating a stronger central government, all got together to draw up an entirely new charter, the modern day Constitution. Many debates occurred within the forming of this document, mainly revolving around slaves and specifications regarding the executive powers. The two main opposing members regarding the executive powers was Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton wanted a single man to be elected for life for executive power. The main argument against this was if one man was in charge, the government would be far too similar to a monarchy.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays