Some of America’s finest minds got together for the Philadelphia convention to figure out which form of government would be best. The Federalists were formed by Alexander Hamilton and its other well-known members were Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, George Washington, and James Madison. Federalists desired a secure central government and feeble state governments, preferred the Constitution to aid the amount owed and stress of the American Revolution, were against the Bill of Rights, and were supported in large urban areas. Meanwhile, the Anti-federalists were composed by Patrick Henry, John Hancock, Richard Lee, George Mason, and Mercy Warren. Anti-federalists insisted that power in the states not in the central government, picked the Articles
…show more content…
Federalism has a history of preserving segregation and slavery, powers are shared amongst national, provincial and state governments so gave the southern states power to form their own laws obtaining slaves. As well as, states urge to compete with each other in a hostile way. By the time, compressing the quantity of benefits they permit to people who receive welfare related to a bordering state, gripping the unnecessary mob to go to the neighboring state, so that they can decrease their welfare dues even more. This reduction of state benefits to the penniless has been called the ‘race to the bottom.’ In addition, federalism allows the inequality of the states. With this in mind, instead of funding education equally throughout the country some states will spend more on education than other states, since it is a state issue. Thus, causing what could be considered inequality. The same goes for other things as well, such as taxes, health care programs, and welfare programs. As can be seen, the disadvantages are many, including rigid essentials in the written constitution, reproduction of offices and functions, and conflicts of authority may arise. The Anti-Federalists believed average citizens should be able to be functioning members of their
Federalism has a history of preserving segregation and slavery, powers are shared amongst national, provincial and state governments so gave the southern states power to form their own laws obtaining slaves. As well as, states urge to compete with each other in a hostile way. By the time, compressing the quantity of benefits they permit to people who receive welfare related to a bordering state, gripping the unnecessary mob to go to the neighboring state, so that they can decrease their welfare dues even more. This reduction of state benefits to the penniless has been called the ‘race to the bottom.’ In addition, federalism allows the inequality of the states. With this in mind, instead of funding education equally throughout the country some states will spend more on education than other states, since it is a state issue. Thus, causing what could be considered inequality. The same goes for other things as well, such as taxes, health care programs, and welfare programs. As can be seen, the disadvantages are many, including rigid essentials in the written constitution, reproduction of offices and functions, and conflicts of authority may arise. The Anti-Federalists believed average citizens should be able to be functioning members of their