Animals squeal with their hearts beating fast. They’re held down by strong arms as a needle is injected into them. The next breath they take might be their last. The injection messes with their brain. Their body becomes mutated. The poor innocent creatures have become test subjects. The only way they can keep living is if the scientist creates some serum to save it. But it doesn’t matter, the animal has already changed, it will never be itself again. Isn’t obvious? Animal testing is inappropriate because it isn’t always reliable, animals are held in captivity even when they aren’t needed for animal testing, and it kills and hurts the animals.
An example of why animal testing is unreasonable, is because it is an unreliable resource for …show more content…
In "What Happens to Animals After Testing?" it explains, “As expected, what will happen to an animal after testing depends on its health and viability after testing” (“What”). Putting diseases into animals and then giving them different medications is torturing the animals."Animal Testing 101" states: “Mice and rats are forced to inhale toxic fumes, dogs are force-fed pesticides, and rabbits have corrosive chemicals rubbed onto their skin and eyes”(“Testing”). They are also forced to to take different medicines to see how they react to the different diseases that have been injected to them. If the animals somehow survive during the tests, in the end they have been mutated. The animals have been mutated and can no longer live with other animals and humans as they state in "What Happens to Animals After Testing?", “this would be far less humane than killing the animals”(“What”), because of their injuries are so bad. One of the only options is for them to be killed by fumes or by having their spine split in half. Though they are usually killed there is a ranch that offers to take in the mutated sheep, pigs, dogs and cats. Even though it has been said that people who test on animals love animals, but there is no way that they would ever be able hurt an animal, then kill the animal after it had fulfilled its so called
An example of why animal testing is unreasonable, is because it is an unreliable resource for …show more content…
In "What Happens to Animals After Testing?" it explains, “As expected, what will happen to an animal after testing depends on its health and viability after testing” (“What”). Putting diseases into animals and then giving them different medications is torturing the animals."Animal Testing 101" states: “Mice and rats are forced to inhale toxic fumes, dogs are force-fed pesticides, and rabbits have corrosive chemicals rubbed onto their skin and eyes”(“Testing”). They are also forced to to take different medicines to see how they react to the different diseases that have been injected to them. If the animals somehow survive during the tests, in the end they have been mutated. The animals have been mutated and can no longer live with other animals and humans as they state in "What Happens to Animals After Testing?", “this would be far less humane than killing the animals”(“What”), because of their injuries are so bad. One of the only options is for them to be killed by fumes or by having their spine split in half. Though they are usually killed there is a ranch that offers to take in the mutated sheep, pigs, dogs and cats. Even though it has been said that people who test on animals love animals, but there is no way that they would ever be able hurt an animal, then kill the animal after it had fulfilled its so called