Argumentative Essay: The Advantages Of Animal Experimentation

Superior Essays
Animal Experimentation Animal experimentation has been around for many centuries. Humans perform these experiments on all species of animals to find different effect of a product it could have on a human. Three advantages in particular advantages are, it helps scientists gain a better understanding for cures of different diseases, this practice makes a vital advance in medicine, and for the expense of treatments and cures animals should not have rights when it comes to research. Although there are many advantages to animal experimentation, there are also disadvantages which include, there is no benefit for the humans, it is cruel, and is dangerous for humans to be treated only after a trial on animals. The first advantage to animal experimentation is using animals like rats can help the scientist gain better knowledge for different …show more content…
In his essay, “Animals Should Not Be Given Rights at the Expense of Human Needs” (2009), Edwin Locke states, “Rights are ethical principles applicable only to beings capable of reason and choice” (Locke par. 5). He is stating that unlike animals, people are taught reasoning and to think through situations, but animal’s instincts are to kill for food and protect themselves. He then goes on to illustrate, “Animals do not survive by rational thought (nor by sign languages allegedly taught to them by psychologists). They survive through sensory-perceptual association and the pleasure-pain mechanism. They cannot reason.” (Locke par. 4) and “Man must use his rational faculty—which is exercised by choice” (Locke par. 2). Here he wants the reader to understand animals and people are in different categories. When it comes to research, scientists do not want to practice on a human that is mindful and is living for a purpose but rather practice on an animal that has only a survival tactic to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Tom Regan argues for the treatment of animals to be the same as that of humans. Rather than arguing a utilitarian perspective, Regan posits that an inherent value exists within entities that are what he calls “the subject of a life,” or rather have the ability to perceive and to possess desires and to deprive these entities of their life without sufficient moral reasoning is unconscionable. While humans may be privy to a larger range of cognitive abilities, Regan argues that these talents are superfluous and that mutual respect must be equally enjoyed amongst all subjects of life. This implies that consumption of meat must cease and that subjection to research cannot unilaterally be applied to animals. Opponents to Regan’s stance argue that…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author’s main purpose about defending the rights of the animals is that they are living creatures. His strong claim determines that researchers are finding animals are more like humans than we ever realized. However, defying by Rifkin’s statement’s and the reason he points out the connection is because us people have not really payed attention to be able to realize the similarity. Animals pass on learning or skills to their young ones which goes the same exact way with humans, most likely why many children look up to or choose to follow their parents footsteps.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Proctor argues that since humans and animals both have the ability to feel positive and negative emotions, they both deserve the respect and the right to not be treated cruelly. Marian Stamp Dawkins expands on the idea that animals deserve to be treated without cruelty in “The Science of Animal Suffering.” Dawkins addresses humanity’s moral obligation to treat animals with dignity and explains how humans can accomplish this different relationship with animals. Robert Garner’s article, “In Defence of Animal Sentience: A Critique of Cochrane’s Liberty Thesis,” furthers the debate on animal rights to include not only the right to not suffer, but also include the right to not be used in any circumstance. Animal rights may only be fully achieved once humans recognize animals’ dignity as living beings.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, it can be conferred from Korsgaard’s arguments and claims that no reason is strong enough to justify the killing of animals. Both humans and non-human animals are similar in many ways, and the only difference between them is that humans have rationality, which animals do not. It is ironical how this difference in rationality is used as an excuse by many to justify the killing of animals, when this intelligence in humans should make them more responsible towards animals, saving their lives rather than killing them. As educated and intelligent humans, killing animals is never morally permissible, since they have intrinsic value and deserve to live their lives to the…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the article “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkin argues that animals should be treated humanely because, according to science, the differences between animals and humans are less than what we think. He believes that animals should be given the rights that protect them from inhumane treatment and human consumption. He is telling us that we have to give them the same rights that a human possesses. In affirmation to Jeremy Rifkin, we should treat animals humanely because they also have a heart that can feel pain and a brain that can think.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is to say that animals are only used at our disposal because they do not think in the same ways humans do. The founder of modern utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham, thought differently than Aquinas and Kant and believed in the direct rights of animals. He rebutted those who thought like Kant by stating “The question is not, Can they reason? nor Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?”…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the applications of animal research to human medicine are limited and often useless. Dr. Aysha Akhtar identifies “three major conditions [that] …. explain why animal experimentation, regardless of the disease category studied, [fail] to reliably inform human health: (1) the effects of the laboratory environment and other variables on study outcomes, (2) disparities between animal models of disease and human diseases, and (3) species differences in physiology and genetics” (“The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation”). These conditions are irresolvable hindrances to the advancement of human medicine; it would be more efficient and beneficial to humans to explore innovative technological alternatives that resemble human physiology more closely. In addition, the idea of sacrificing the welfare of animals to advance the welfare of humans is flawed in that it necessarily places more weight on the rights of humans, which violates the deontological view on the rights of sentient beings.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the major topics animal activist argue about is Animal Experimentation. “Throughout history, most humans have considered themselves superior to all other species. This thinking led and still leads some people to allow the use of animals in research”(perdew)p.g11. At the moment millions of animals are locked inside barren cages in laboratories across the country.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal experimentation should be used to advance our medical research and medicine. In our society today we cannot stop the use of animal experimentation; our technology isn’t that advanced. In this paper you will see for example, how nonhuman primates is vital to science, experiments on dogs have led to medical breakthroughs, and that it is not possible to replace animals in Medical research. Nonhuman Primates is essential in the advance of science. In the article “Experimenting on Nonhuman Primates Is Vital to Science” states, “The National Institutes of Health (NIH)…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although animal experimentation has provided many benefits, there are alternatives to test toxic substances that may eliminate the cruel use of animals in research. The United States, along with many other countries, have turned to the use of animals in research labs to test human products for hazardous substances. According to the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, the United States uses about 12 million animals every year making it the biggest conductor of animal experimentation in the world. Scientists and many companies believe that testing their products on animals save humans from being harmed if the product is toxic. However, no matter what the benefits of animal experimentation are, the tests conducted on the animals are cruel.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Few examples exist that truly show how cruel people can be, and animal testing is high on the list. Imagine a beloved animal, caged in stainless steel, shaking, being analyzed for the effects of a new ingredient in a beauty product. Millions are drawn to protest the tests conducted for vanity, and some countries have already placed laws in action to ban the practice. The fight continues in the U.S. for the welfare of animals that are still undergoing vile tests so that people can have cosmetic products. The cry for justice grows louder as new technology allows far more accurate testing to be conducted, without ever involving innocent animals that will live out their lives and likely die in the laboratories, often as a result of the tests.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    Now days, society can volunteer themselves in clinical drug research for a monetary exchange. With modern science “we can see inside peoples’ brains using imaging machines or test microscopic amounts of new drugs harmlessly on volunteers.” (BUAV.org the campaign to end animal experiments, pg 7) Humans are more willing to volunteer themselves for the money, but also because strict health and safety precautions are put in place for their well-being at all times during the study. Humans can also communicate their side effects and pain occurrence which provides sound and optimal results for future modifications and or dosages. Unfortunately, animals cannot communicate these important factors, which in turn is useless.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animals that are experimented on are mostly mammals as well. This means that animals such as dogs, cats, and other mammals are also infected everyday with the same diseases that affect us humans. What I mean is that since our anatomy is very similar to that of other animals, the medicine we create from animal testing can also benefit the animals themselves. So in reality, the benefits of animal experimentation actually far outweigh the consequences because it helps us, and it also helps the animals in the long run because we can treat them as well. It is proven that many veterinary medicines are the same as the medicine we receive from our doctors.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal Testing Nowadays scientist create many new things that make our life easier or even better than before . This can include creations of: hair gain shampoo, delicious chocolate or impactful medicine, and this has to be tested for perfection. The people of this country want perfection and this includes people and animals as well. This includes testing their products on animals who are perfect for experimental study such as monkeys or rats. In reality, experimenting on animals will make our world a better place.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today we have made many advances in the world. A scientific evolution has firmly been set, yet in doing so we have failed to set moral and ethical boundaries along the journey. The knowledge we have acquired is remarkable, but with it comes responsibility to use it wisely and ethically. Every day we torture and kill thousands of animals for our own heartless wants. Animal Testing has been a highly debated and ongoing topic for many years.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays