He speaks of old friendships being distasteful like that of cold meats. This pulls emotional ideas of disgust and repulsive thoughts rather than that of warm-fuzzy feelings that everyone wants. Hazlitt also refers to the long-term relationships that can grow from fun and warm and fuzzy to that of weariness and contempt at any moment. Also, the reference of “if we meet again after an interval of absence, we appear no longer the same. One is too wise, another too foolish, for us; and we wonder we did not find this out before” also us to connect as most people have had a similar effect as some have gone on to do wonderful things and others fail, but when you reunite you realize the flaws in the other person and move on with your life. Just because you have a great friendship does not mean it will last forever. If we were going to give his idea a modern take on the world, we could express it as two people who are dating. One person moves away, but they continue to date. While they have this separation, they begin to realize flaws within the other person and when they meet back up they realize that everything was a mistake. When two people are close together a lot then you begin to tire of each other, but if you separate for too long then you can begin to realize serious flaws in each other. His reasoning is extremely effective as it connects with a large part of the population. His …show more content…
He goes on to prove this throughout his essay as he establishes credibility for himself, a logical standpoint and an emotionally ground crucial point of the essay. He does so effectively as his entire essay is able to connect to the audience rather early in the essay and is able to drive home his point as it continues. His use of ethos, pathos and logos allowed for him to draw the reader in and quickly control the pace of the argument to convince everyone that he was