Dustin Hoffman v. Los Angeles Magazine An article entitled "Grand Illusions" in the "Fabulous Hollywood Issue!" of Los Angeles Magazine in March 1997 featured several famous film stills altered such that the movie stars appeared to be wearing spring fashions. The scenes included Cary Grant in “North by Northwest,” John Travolta in “Saturday Night Fever,” Elvis Presley in “Jailhouse Rock,” ), and Marilyn Monroe in "The Seven Year Itch.” The final image was a play on the legendary image of Dustin Hoffman posing in front of an American flag from the 1982 film “Tootsie,” but Hoffman was depicted in a Richard Tyler butter-colored silk gown and Ralph Lauren heels instead of the original red long-sleeved sequined evening dress and high heels. One month later, Hoffman filed a $5 million lawsuit against Los Angeles Magazine's owner and publisher, Fairchild Publications (which is owned by Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.), alleging that the photograph misappropriated Hoffman's name and likeness in violation of the California common law right of publicity, the California statutory right of publicity, the California unfair competition statute, and the federal Lanham Act.…
The Elbridge’s divorced in 2010 and Mrs. Gwen Eldridge was awarded custody of their two minor children. Mr. Eldridge was ordered to make child support payments of $700 per month. He lost his job as an electrician in January of 2011 and was unemployed from that date through October of 2011. Upon which Mr. Eldridge received a job in his field as an electrician. Unfortunately, Mr. Eldridge did not make child support payments for the 10 months that he was unemployed.…
Supreme Court of the United States School Dist. of Abington Tp. v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963) School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. Schempp No. 142 Argued February 27-28, 1963 Decided June 17, 1963* 374 U.S. 203. Facts: The Supreme Court of the United States heard the School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. Schempp case on February 27-28, 1963, and reached a verdict on June 17, 1963.…
Student protestors of Gallaudet University presented the Gallaudet University Board of Trustees with four demands: 1. The resignation of the newly appointed university president Elizabeth Zinser, a hearing person, and the selection of a Deaf person as the universities president. 2. The immediate resignation of Jane Basset Spilman, who was chair of the Board of Trustees. 3.…
In the Supreme Court Case of Reed v. Reed, 1971, The Extent of Equal Rights, two parents sought the ownership of their deceased sons estate. Richard Lynn Reed was still a minot when he passed without a will addressing which of his possessions would go to whom, both of his parents, Cecil and Sally Reed, made advances to claim their adoptive sons land. Both Cecil and Sally filed applications to become the administrator of the estate to the Idaho court, who then held a joint hearing for them. The court came to the conclusion that the Richards father, Cecil, would be granted administrator because the Idaho law dictated that “if several persons who are equally entitled to administer an estate file a petition, ‘males must be preferred to females. ’”(Supreme…
Cases Bhasin v Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 1 Macera v Abcon Media Canada Inc., [2017] OJ No 3740 1 Duty of Good Faith Acting in good faith in Canadian contract law means to act honestly without malice, however at times, it can come off as unclear in defined terms. In contract law, it refers to each party in the contract who will perform their end of the deal reasonably, with integrity and not unpredictably or randomly. There are two important steps in good faith performances.…
The sub-heading of the article “where is it appropriate to broadcast to the world?” is a direct use of the rhetorical question, which catches reader’s attention at the first place. Not only that, the question has been debated through different perspectives as the author continues providing several evidence. Consequently, readers would have picked either side after considering all those aspects. The use of the rhetorical question in this case greatly points out the issue that author raises, meanwhile the author does not favour either way. Hayden Watters uses data “more than 200,000 people” to illustrate the impact that this live stream video has on the internet.…
The supreme court of the United States handled the case of King vs Burwell which was argued on March 25,2015 this decision was made by the Supreme Court, when the decision was made it was made as a statue of which the courts outlaid the premium tax credits to any of the qualifying persons or people in all states of the United States . When the petitioners did argue that the language of the statues who provided eligibility for the tax credits meant that it was for those who live in the United states only. Of course the courts did reject the interpretation because the way that Supreme Courts sees things they found that this dispute clause to be ambiguous to the majority. congress did make the guaranteed that this issue and community ratings and…
The central point that chapter four is asking is whether or not morality depends on religion. The chapter begins with a story about Judge Moore of Alabama and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The ACLU sued Judge Moore "...for displaying the Ten Commandments in his courtroom. " This was a problem according to the ACLU because, it violates the separation of church and state. Judge Moore however, used this incident to become chief justice.…
Court Case Review Throughout the years the United States government has been faced with several discussions. Some of these have become very important throughout history and have left a significate impact on society. These cases range from birth control privacy rights to equality. Among these cases are Griswold V. Connecticut, Baze V. Rees, and Brown V. Board of Education.…
When the privacy of students comes into question there are mixed responses, especially when it comes to the contents of a student’s bag. From the landmark supreme court case TLO v. New Jersey, the privacy students have in school has inevitably come into question. Whether TLO or New Jersey was right, this court case changed the way we look at students and their privacy. Some may argue that students have no privacy in school while others may think they have too much. Has the Supreme Court already decided where they stand on this hot button topic?…
The exclusionary rule became very specific as to what was excluded and what wasn’t overtime due to certain cases. In Katz v. United States, 1967 abstract items were protected from unreasonable searches and seizures and found objects like waste and garbage are not applied in the fourth amendment (California v. Greenwood, 1988) The biggest concern after this was whether or not this clause also apply to students. Two students in Middlesex County,New Jersey were at their high school and were caught smoking in the restroom by a teacher. T.L.O. (Tracy Lois Odem) and the other student were taken to the principal’s office.…
The Katz vs. United States case was a very controversial case due to the vagueness the fourth amendment applied to this particular case. Basically, Katz was convicted of transmitting wagering information over telephone lines in violation of federal law. After reviewing the case brief it is understood that Katz was unaware of the tactics of the government, placing a listening device on top of the phone booth Katz was occupying. The argument for the case was whether or not Katz’s fourth amendment rights were violated in the process of obtaining evidence. The protection of the fourth amendment of the United States Constitution, against unreasonable searches and seizures, follows the person and not the place.…
“Plainly a whole community cannot be restrained from discussing a subject intimately affecting life within it,” Chief Justice Warren Burger states. Burger wrote the opinion on the Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart that came to the conclusion of there was not enough evidence to make the trial a closed trial. At the beginning of the trial, the judge considered the hearing for having a closed trial, but it took him to long to come to a decision. By the time the Supreme Court received the trial, Erwin Charles Simants’ murder case was already done and over with. Since it was done, the Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart case became moot and pushed to the side.…
Aereo was a technology company in New York City that allowed subscribers to view live and time shifted streams over-the-air television on Internet connected devices. Aereo was released back in 2012 by Chaitanya Kanojia. Aereo could also be used on Windows and Linux computers. It could also be used on handheld devices. Aereo offered 28 channels, especially all of the major broadcast channels and it was offered in many cities across America.…