The passage regarding the Walking Woman’s beginnings is far from certain: “By her own account she had begun by walking off an illness. There had been an invalid to be taken care of for years, leaving her at last broken in body, and with no recourse but her own feet to carry her out of that predicament” (217). The reader is left to not only decide what sort of “illness” the Walking Woman suffered from, but also the relation between herself and her “invalid.” Both terms can be read literally and figuratively. The illness she suffers could be born of an adherence to duties of matrimony, motherhood, filial devotion, or something completely removed from any of these proposed readings. The particulars of the passage are purposefully vague. Austin’s reluctance to present the character in straightforward terms makes the experiences of the Walking Woman applicable to a variety of suppositions, all with equal connection to “feminine” gender roles, yet open enough not to be confined to any one
The passage regarding the Walking Woman’s beginnings is far from certain: “By her own account she had begun by walking off an illness. There had been an invalid to be taken care of for years, leaving her at last broken in body, and with no recourse but her own feet to carry her out of that predicament” (217). The reader is left to not only decide what sort of “illness” the Walking Woman suffered from, but also the relation between herself and her “invalid.” Both terms can be read literally and figuratively. The illness she suffers could be born of an adherence to duties of matrimony, motherhood, filial devotion, or something completely removed from any of these proposed readings. The particulars of the passage are purposefully vague. Austin’s reluctance to present the character in straightforward terms makes the experiences of the Walking Woman applicable to a variety of suppositions, all with equal connection to “feminine” gender roles, yet open enough not to be confined to any one